SOUNDS TO ESTABLISH A CORPS: THE ORIGINS OF THE UNITED STATES MARINE BAND, 1798–1804

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-132
Author(s):  
PATRICK R. WARFIELD

AbstractThe Jeffersonian rise to power in 1801 ushered in sweeping political changes for the United States of America. It also focused attention on the newly established United States Marine Corps, as a group of hostile Congressmen sought to audit the service, dismiss many of its officers and do away with the executive function of its commandant. But Thomas Jefferson (1743–1826) was also a supporter of the new capital's growing cultural life, and no organization better defined the connection between music and the federal government than the United States Marine Band. While this ensemble was not officially authorized by Congress until 1861, Commandant William Ward Burrows had already transformed his small group of sanctioned field musicians into an ensemble that could provide ceremonial and entertainment music for Washington, DC. This article traces the earliest history of the Marine Band, documents its development from eighteenth-century signalling traditions and suggests the ways in which its presence in the capital helped to stem the growing Republican tide against the Marine Corps itself.

1940 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 411
Author(s):  
Robert W. Neeser ◽  
Clyde H. Metcalf

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-162
Author(s):  
Mie Augier ◽  
Sean F X Barrett

Abstract This article describes a key period in the institutional and organizational history of the United States Marine Corps. Using historical, archival, and interview material, we apply some of the ideas and perspectives of James G. March to understand the organizational dynamics and mechanisms that enabled the maneuver warfare movement and made the modern Marine Corps a more innovative and adaptive organization. We build on and integrate several streams of March’s research, legacies, and interests, including understanding the organizational conditions that help novelty and outlier-ness flourish, finding interest and value in apparent contradictions, and deriving implications for organizational scholarship and for the organization under study.


1998 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth K. Holmes ◽  
Rakesh Lall ◽  
John M. Mateczun ◽  
Gerry L. Wilcove

Risk factors for suicide among active-duty members of the United States Marine Corps were investigated. Three groups were suicide attempters ( n = 172), completers ( n = 22), and a nonpsychiatric comparison group ( n = 384). A series of multiple regression and discriminant analyses were conducted to assess whether any of 137 selected risk-factors differentiated the suicidal group from the comparison group. The following factors differentiated suicide attempters and completers from the comparison group and were associated with increased suicide risk: History of Abuse, Neglect, or Rejection, Lower Performance Evaluation, Symptoms of Depression, No History of Gambling Behavior, Younger Age, History of Alcohol Abuse, and Hopelessness. A discriminant analysis using these seven variables resulted in a 77% accuracy rate. When evaluating variables that could be obtained by a review of military records alone, three variables differentiated the attempters and completers from the comparison group, Lower Performance Evaluation, Younger Age, and a History of Military or Legal Problems. These variables correctly classified 73% of the sample. Implications for suicide-risk assessment for individuals in the Marine Corps are provided.


1981 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 356
Author(s):  
Robert Seager II ◽  
Allan R. Millett

1981 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
William M. Belote ◽  
Allan R. Millett

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document