A voice for future EM physicians

On June 10 to 11 this year, the Residents’ Section of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP-RS) held its first official national forum for future emergency physicians — the First Canadian EM Residents Workshop, in conjunction with CAEP 2000. To celebrate the event, the RS decided to invite a nationally recognized emergency medicine leader, advocate, and teacher to be the first to address the Annual Residents’ Dinner. We were grateful for the privilege of having Dr. Isser Dubinsky be that person. Dr. Dubinsky, currently Chief of Emergency Services at the University Health Network in Toronto, was asked to speak about “The Future of Emergency Medicine.” Dr. Dubinsky's speech, filled with warmth, wisdom, and humanity, is transcribed below. — Jason Frank, MD, Chair CAEP-RS

Download Full-text

Health human resources for emergency medicine: a framework for the future

CJEM ◽

10.1017/cem.2019.446 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

pp. 40-44

Author(s):

Douglas Sinclair ◽

Peter Toth ◽

Alecs Chochinov ◽

John Foote ◽

Kirsten Johnson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Emergency Medicine ◽

Annual Meeting ◽

Royal College ◽

Training Programs ◽

Family Physicians ◽

Quebec City ◽

Final Report ◽

Full Time ◽

Emergency Physicians ◽

The Future

ABSTRACTIn June of 2016, the Collaborative Working Group (CWG) on the Future of Emergency Medicine presented its final report at the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) annual meeting in Quebec City. The CWG report made a number of recommendations concerning physician Human Health Resource (HHR) shortfalls in emergency medicine, specific changes for both the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (FRCPC) and the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CCFP-EM) training programs, HHR needs in rural and remote hospitals, future collaboration of the CCFP-EM and FRCPC programs, and directions for future research. All recommendations were endorsed by CAEP, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC), and the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC). The CWG report was published in CJEM and has served as a basis for ongoing discussion in the emergency medicine community in Canada. The CWG identified an estimated shortfall of 478 emergency physicians in Canada in 2016, rising to 1071 by 2020 and 1518 by 2025 assuming no expansion of EM residency training capacity. In 2017, the CAEP board struck a new committee, The Future of Emergency Medicine in Canada (FEMC), to advocate with appropriate stakeholders to implement the CWG recommendations and to continue with this important work. FEMC led a workshop at CAEP 2018 in Calgary to develop a regional approach to HHR advocacy, recognizing different realities in each province and region. There was wide representation at this workshop and a rich and passionate discussion among those present. This paper represents the output of the workshop and will guide subsequent deliberations by FEMC. FEMC has set the following three goals as we work toward the overarching purpose to improve timely access to high quality emergency care: (1) to define and describe categories of emergency departments (EDs) in Canada, (2) define the full time equivalents required by category of ED in Canada, and (3) recommend the ideal combination of training and certification for emergency physicians in Canada. A fourth goal supports the other three goals: (4) urge further consideration and implementation of the CWG-EM recommendations related to coordination and optimization of the current two training programs. We believe that goals 1 and 2 can largely be accomplished by the CAEP annual meeting in 2020, and goal 3 by the CAEP annual meeting in 2021. Goal 4 is ongoing with both the RCPSC and the CFPC. We urge the EM community across Canada to engage with our committee to support improved access and EM care for all Canadians.

Download Full-text

The projected oversupply in the emergency medicine physician workforce: Time for solutions to save the future generations of emergency physicians

The American Journal of Emergency Medicine ◽

10.1016/j.ajem.2021.03.076 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Mitchell Bourne ◽

Mark McKenney ◽

Adel Elkbuli

Keyword(s):

Emergency Medicine ◽

Future Generations ◽

Physician Workforce ◽

Emergency Physicians ◽

Emergency Medicine Physician ◽

Medicine Physician ◽

The Future

Download Full-text

The International Federation for Emergency Medicine report on emergency department crowding and access block: a brief summary

International Journal of Emergency Medicine ◽

10.1186/s12245-020-00312-x ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

Author(s):

A. P. Javidan ◽

◽

K. Hansen ◽

I. Higginson ◽

P. Jones ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Emergency Medicine ◽

Task Force ◽

Video Conferencing ◽

International Federation ◽

Emergency Physicians ◽

Emergency Department Crowding ◽

Comprehensive Guidance ◽

The World ◽

Ed Crowding

Abstract Objective To develop comprehensive guidance that captures international impacts, causes, and solutions related to emergency department crowding and access block Methods Emergency physicians representing 15 countries from all IFEM regions composed the Task Force. Monthly meetings were held via video-conferencing software to achieve consensus for report content. The report was submitted and approved by the IFEM Board on June 1, 2020. Results A total of 14 topic dossiers, each relating to an aspect of ED crowding, were researched and completed collaboratively by members of the Task Force. Conclusions The IFEM report is a comprehensive document intended to be used in whole or by section to inform and address aspects of ED crowding and access block. Overall, ED crowding is a multifactorial issue requiring systems-wide solutions applied at local, regional, and national levels. Access block is the predominant contributor of ED crowding in most parts of the world.

Download Full-text

P026: Need for training in medical education: staff emergency physician perspectives

CJEM ◽

10.1017/cem.2017.228 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 19 (S1) ◽

pp. S86

Author(s):

J. Bryan ◽

F. Al Rawi ◽

T. Bhandari ◽

J. Chu ◽

S. Hansen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Emergency Medicine ◽

Medical Education ◽

Adult Education ◽

Family Medicine ◽

Graduate Training ◽

Formal Training ◽

Emergency Physicians ◽

Allied Health Professionals ◽

Evaluation Time ◽

Post Graduate Training

Introduction: Emergency medicine physicians in our urban/suburban area have a range of training in medical education; some have no formal training in medical education, whereas others have completed Master’s level training in adult education. Not all staff have a university appointment; of those who are affiliated with our university, 87 have appointments through the Department of Medicine, 21 through the Department of Pediatrics, and 117 through the Department of Family Medicine. Emergency physicians in our area are a diverse group of physicians in terms of both formal training in adult education and in the variety of settings in which we work. The purpose of this study was to gauge interest in formal training in adult education among emergency medicine physicians. Methods: With research ethics board approval, we created and sent a 10-item electronic questionnaire to emergency medicine staff in our area. The questionnaire included items on demographics, experience in emergency medicine, additional post-graduate training, current teaching activities and interest in short (30-60 minute) adult education sessions. Results: Of a potential 360 active emergency physicians in our area, 120 responded to the questionnaire (33.3%), representing 12 area hospitals. Nearly half of respondents had been in practice over 10 years (48.44%). Respondents were mainly FRCP (50%) or CCFP-EM (47.50%) trained. 33.3% of respondents had masters degrees, of which 15% were MEd. Most physicians were involved in teaching medical students (98.33%), FRCP residents (80%) and family medicine residents (88.3%), though many were also teaching off-service residents, and allied health professionals. More than half of respondents (60%) were interested in attending short sessions to improve their skills as adult educators. The topics of most interest were feedback and evaluation, time-efficient teaching, the learner in difficulty, case-based teaching and bedside teaching. Conclusion: Emergency physicians in our area have a wide variety of experience and training in medical education. They are involved in teaching learners from a range of training levels and backgrounds. Physicians who responded to our survey expressed an interest in additional formal teaching on adult education topics geared toward emergency medicine.

Download Full-text