scholarly journals Measured weight in early pregnancy is a valid method for estimating pre-pregnancy weight

Author(s):  
Hazel Inskip ◽  
Sarah Crozier ◽  
Janis Baird ◽  
Julia Hammond ◽  
Sian Robinson ◽  
...  

Abstract Estimation of pre-pregnancy weight is difficult because measurements taken before pregnancy are rarely available. No studies have compared various ‘proxy’ measures using recalled weight or based on early pregnancy weight with actual measurements of pre-pregnancy weight. The Southampton Women’s Survey recruited women during 1998–2002 who were not pregnant. Data on 198 women with an estimated date of conception within 3 months of recruitment were analysed. Three proxy measures were considered: (1) recalled pre-pregnancy weight obtained during early pregnancy, (2) measured weight in early pregnancy and (3) estimated pre-pregnancy weight using a published model. Mean (standard deviation) recalled weight was 1.65 (3.03) kg lighter than measured pre-pregnancy weight, while early pregnancy weight and weights from the published model were 0.88 (2.34) and 0.88 (2.33) kg heavier, respectively. The Bland–Altman limits of agreement for recalled weight were −7.59 to 4.29 kg, wider than those for the early pregnancy weight: −3.71 to 5.47 kg and the published model: −3.68 to 5.45 kg. For estimating pre-pregnancy weight, we recommend subtraction of 0.88 kg from early pregnancy weight or the published model, or addition of 1.65 kg to recalled weight. Estimates of pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain categories were very similar when using early pregnancy and published model weights, but they differed from those using recalled weight. Our findings indicate that calculations of first trimester weight gain using recalled weight must be treated cautiously, and a measured weight in early pregnancy provides a more precise assessment of pre-pregnancy weight than recalled weight.

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (207) ◽  
pp. 309-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meena Thapa ◽  
Rupa Paneru

Introduction: Gestational weight gain is an important predictor of the health of the newborn. It is affected by body mass index of the women. This study was conducted to find out gestational weight gain according to Institute of Medicine 2009 recommendation and relationship of newborn birth weight to body mass index and gestational weight gain of the women. Methods: It was cross sectional, hospital based study. The women, who attended at term pregnancy for delivery and having recorded first trimester body weight, were included in the study. Their body mass index was calculated and they were stratified into 4 groups according to body mass index. The gestational weight gain was calculated by subtracting first trimester body weight from body weight at the time of admission for delivery. All the women were followed till delivery. The newborn birth weight was taken immediately after delivery. Results: A total of 227 women were enrolled in the study. More than half of the women had normal body mass index. There were 36% overweight and obese women. Mean gestational weight gain was 10.21 kg, and mean weight of the newborn was 3.05 kg.  There were equal number of women who had adequate weight gain and less weight gain according to the recommendation. Excess weight gain was seen in 15% of women. Women of higher body mass index and women who had gain more weight during pregnancy had larger newborns. Conclusions: Body mass index and gestational weight gain of the women were important predictors of birth weight of the newborn.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 938-938
Author(s):  
Jinan Banna ◽  
Yan Yan Wu ◽  
Cristina Palacios

Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to identify the socio-demographic correlates of pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) among low-income women in the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program in Hawai‘i. Methods Participants were low-income pregnant women (n = 83) in Hawaii enrolled in a four-month text message-based nutrition intervention program. Participants reported pre-pregnancy weight and height and completed a demographics questionnaire. GWG was calculated by subtracting the last weight taken before delivery from pre-pregnancy weight. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between demographic variables and pre-pregnancy BMI and GWG. Results BMI before pregnancy, age and number of children were associated with GWG. Women who were obese before pregnancy gained 33 pounds less compared to those who had normal BMI (95% CI: 17 to 50, P < 0.0001). Women in the age group 30–35 gained 25 pounds (95% CI: 4 to 45, P = 0.012) and 27 pounds (95% CI: 9 to 45, P = 0.004) more compared to age groups 18–24 and 24–34, respectively. Those with three to five children gained 13.6 pounds less weight (95% CI: 0 to 28, P = 0.05): than those with fewer children. Additionally, age and race/ethnicity were marginally associated with BMI before pregnancy. The age group 30–35 had the highest BMI before pregnancy (P = 0.08) and Asian had lower BMI before pregnancy than the other races/ethnicities (P = 0.04). Conclusions Being 30–35 years old and having 3–5 children were associated with gaining more weight during pregnancy. These socio-demographic factors should be taken into account when designing interventions for promoting an adequate GWG. Funding Sources Mountain West Clinical Translational Research Infrastructure Network under a grant from National Institute of General Medicine Sciences of the National Institute of Health.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Tingzhao Wang ◽  
Lichun Li ◽  
Chunchun Wu ◽  
Rong Cao ◽  
Qingli Li ◽  
...  

The objective of the study is to analyze the association between early pregnancy body mass index (BMI), gestational weight gain (GWG), and maternal and neonatal outcomes. The retrospective cohort study was conducted at Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University from January 2018 to May 2021, with 552 women enrolled. Women were divided into the underweight group, normal weight group, overweight group, and obese group according to early pregnancy BMI. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. The absolute risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in the early pregnancy BMI group was calculated to further analyze the association between GWG and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Of the 552 women, 390 (70.65%) women had adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. The result revealed that overweight was associated with increased risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes (odds ratio (OR): 1.643, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.006-2.684), maternal complications (OR: 1.937, 95% CI: 1.188-3.159), and large for gestational age (LGA) (OR: 1.905, 95% CI: 1.061-3.422). In the obese group, the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes (OR: 5.760, 95% CI: 1.997-16.786), maternal complications (OR: 3.112, 95% CI: 1.645-5.887), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (OR: 2.943, 95% CI: 1.509-5.741), cesarean section (OR: 1.899, 95% CI: 1.002-3.599), and preterm delivery (OR: 4.752, 95% CI: 1.395-16.185) increased. Besides, there was an association between insufficient GWG and decreased risk of LGA (OR: 0.392, 95% CI: 0.187-0.826) and higher risk of preterm delivery (OR: 2.818, 95% CI: 1.171-6.784). This study demonstrates that BMI and GWG are related to maternal and neonatal outcomes. It is necessary to regularly monitor the weight of pregnant women during pregnancy. And regional guidelines for GWG also need to be explored.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 268-269
Author(s):  
Bolanle Okunowo ◽  
Ifedayo Odeniyi ◽  
Oluwarotimi Olopade ◽  
Olufemi Fasanmade ◽  
Omololu Adegbola ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 1288-1294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen A Nohr ◽  
Michael Vaeth ◽  
Jennifer L Baker ◽  
Thorkild IA Sørensen ◽  
Jorn Olsen ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 92 (7) ◽  
pp. 809-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nils-Halvdan Morken ◽  
Kari Klungsøyr ◽  
Per Magnus ◽  
Rolv Skjaerven

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document