scholarly journals If We Build It, Only Some Will Come: An Experimental Study of Mobilization for Seattle’s Democracy Voucher Program

Author(s):  
Geoffrey Henderson ◽  
Hahrie Han

Abstract Seattle, Washington instituted a new “democracy voucher” program in 2017 providing each registered voter with four $25 campaign finance vouchers to contribute to municipal candidates. Prior research shows that without efforts to mobilize voters, electoral reforms like the voucher program are often insufficient to increase participation among underrepresented groups. We examine how mobilization affects the voucher program’s redistributive goals – does it increase participation among infrequent voters, or does it engage regular participants in politics? In the 2017 election cycle, we partnered with a coalition of advocacy organizations on a field experiment to estimate the effects of providing voters with information about democracy vouchers through door-to-door canvassing, texting, digital advertisements, and e-mails. While mobilization increased voucher use and voter turnout, responsiveness was greatest among frequent voters. As our findings suggest that transactional mobilizing is insufficient to engage infrequent participants, we posit that deeper organizing is necessary to fulfill the program’s redistributive goals.

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 1089-1103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cameron D. Anderson ◽  
Peter J. Loewen ◽  
R. Michael McGregor

Author(s):  
Jan E. Leighley ◽  
Jonathan Nagler

This book compares the demographic characteristics and political views of voters and non-voters in U.S. presidential elections since 1972 and examines how electoral reforms and the choices offered by candidates influence voter turnout. Drawing on a wealth of data from the U.S. Census Bureau's Current Population Survey and the American National Election Studies, the book demonstrates that the rich have consistently voted more than the poor for the past four decades, and that voters are substantially more conservative in their economic views than non-voters. The book finds that women are now more likely to vote than men, that the gap in voting rates between blacks and whites has largely disappeared, and that older Americans continue to vote more than younger Americans. The book also shows how electoral reforms such as Election Day voter registration and absentee voting have boosted voter turnout, and how turnout would also rise if parties offered more distinct choices. Providing the most systematic analysis available of modern voter turnout, this book reveals that persistent class bias in turnout has enduring political consequences, and that it really does matter who votes and who doesn't.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Schein ◽  
Keyon Vafa ◽  
Dhanya Sridhar ◽  
Victor Veitch ◽  
Jeffrey Quinn ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 96 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 569-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Schwerdt ◽  
Dolores Messer ◽  
Ludger Woessmann ◽  
Stefan C. Wolter

2006 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
JENS GROßER ◽  
ARTHUR SCHRAM

We study the effect of social embeddedness on voter turnout by investigating the role of information about other voters' decisions. We do so in a participation game, in which we distinguish between early and late voters. Each late voter is told about one early voter's turnout decision. Cases are distinguished where the voters are allies (support the same group) or adversaries (with opposing preferences) and where they are uncertain about each other's preferences. Our experimental results show that the social embeddedness matters: this information increases aggregate turnout by approximately 50%. The largest effect is observed for allies. Early voters strategically try to use their first mover position and late voters respond to this.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document