Porosity and Fracture Changes of Coal under Uniaxial Strain Conditions Based on the X-ray Microscopic Imaging Technology

Author(s):  
Qi Yang ◽  
Yanbin Yu ◽  
Weimin Cheng ◽  
Wenting Cui ◽  
Qilin Xin ◽  
...  
MRS Bulletin ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.H. Kinney ◽  
Q.C. Johnson ◽  
U. Bonse ◽  
M.C. Nichols ◽  
R.A. Saroyan ◽  
...  

Imaging is the cornerstone of materials characterization. Until the middle of the present century, visible light imaging provided much of the information about materials. Though visible light imaging still plays an extremely important role in characterization, relatively low spatial resolution and lack of chemical sensitivity and specificity limit its usefulness.The discovery of x-rays and electrons led to a major advance in imaging technology. X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy allowed us to characterize the atomic structure of materials. Many materials vital to our high technology economy and defense owe their existence to the understanding of materials structure brought about with these high-resolution methods.Electron microscopy is an essential tool for materials characterization. Unfortunately, electron imaging is always destructive due to the sample preparation that must be done prior to imaging. Furthermore, electron microscopy only provides information about the surface of a sample. Three dimensional information, of great interest in characterizing many new materials, can be obtained only by time consuming sectioning of an object.The development of intense synchrotron light sources in addition to the improvements in solid state imaging technology is revolutionizing materials characterization. High resolution x-ray imaging is a potentially valuable tool for materials characterization. The large depth of x-ray penetration, as well as the sensitivity of absorption crosssections to atomic chemistry, allows x-ray imaging to characterize the chemistry of internal structures in macroscopic objects with little sample preparation. X-ray imaging complements other imaging modalities, such as electron microscopy, in that it can be performed nondestructively on metals and insulators alike.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (S2) ◽  
pp. 542-543
Author(s):  
Kai zhang ◽  
Fang Ren ◽  
Xuelong Wang ◽  
Enyuan Hu ◽  
Xiao-Qing Yang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (S1) ◽  
pp. 89-89
Author(s):  
Jamie Erskine ◽  
Anastasia Chalkidou

IntroductionThe Evelina London Children's Hospital (ELCH) is undergoing a period of growth, including a new building planned to be completed within the next five years. Due to limited space and ambitions to be a state-of-the-art hospital, Horizon Scanning (HS) was considered important to ‘future-proof’ new facilities. As the aim of HS is to identify signals of coming change, ‘scanning’ the previous five years’ trends may be beneficial to an iterative HS methodology. Thus, it was thought that capital bids could provide a range of useful information required to make procurement decisions.MethodsKing's Technology Evaluation Centre (KiTEC) provided hospital-based HTA and HS support for the expansion of a London-based paediatric hospital. KiTEC focused on imaging technology due to its large spatial requirements and high-costs and assessed all capital bids made over the previous five years. A capital bidding system is used within GSTT to allocate funding for medical equipment that costs more than GBP5000 (USD 6540.70). Information was collated for all imaging equipment bid for over the previous five years and assessed for trends in imaging modalities and purchase costs.ResultsA total of 135 bids were made in the period 2013-2018, eight of which were by ECLH. Bids for ultrasound equipment were most common and rose over the period. Bids for CT scanners also rose, while bids for MRI scanners and x-ray technology were consistent and bids for fluoroscopy fell. The total cost of imaging bids over the interval rose steadily from GBP5.4 million to GBP6.9 million.ConclusionsDue to the lifespan of imaging technology, some trends may not emerge within a five year window. While some interesting findings were made, a ten to fifteen year period may require to be scanned for a robust analysis. This methodology is best applied in an iterative fashion along with standard HS techniques.


2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (10) ◽  
pp. 3128-3134 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.W. Huang ◽  
D. Liu ◽  
J.M. Hu ◽  
S.Y. Xu ◽  
S.M. Zhuo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-119
Author(s):  
Ying Wu ◽  
Guohua Huang ◽  
Qiufeng Li ◽  
Jinai He

Objective: The objective is to explore the application of computed X-ray tomography (CT) imaging technology in peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), and to propose a more effective method for PICC catheterization. Method: In this study, 69 subjects are divided into the observation group (X-ray and CT) and the control group (X-ray). The guiding effect of CT images on PICC tube placement in complex cases is compared. In this study, CT localization of the superior vena cava–caval-atrial junction (CAJ) is used as the gold standard. The position relationship of carina-CAJ and carina-PICC catheter tip is measured and analyzed by CT image and chest radiography (CXR) image, providing scientific basis for PICC tip imaging. Results: After this study, the tip of the catheter should be 1/3 of the middle and lower part of the superior vena cava, about 3 cm above the junction of the right atrium and the superior vena cava, and in the upper part of the diaphragm of the inferior vena cava, so that it cannot enter the right ventricle or the right atrium. The best position of the tip of the catheter is near the junction of the superior vena cava and the right atrium. The average vertical distance between the tracheal carina and CAJ is 4.79 cm. Conclusion: CT and X-ray examination can effectively determine the location of the tip of PICC catheter in cancer chemotherapy patients, but the clarity of X-ray examination is missing. It is suggested to adopt CT examination, and further adopt and promote it.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document