scholarly journals New Application of Old Material: Chinese Traditional Ink for Photothermal Therapy of Metastatic Lymph Nodes

ACS Omega ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. 5170-5178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng Wang ◽  
Yongbin Cao ◽  
Qin Zhang ◽  
Haibao Peng ◽  
Lei Liang ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adewale O. Oladipo ◽  
Oluwatobi S. Oluwafemi ◽  
Sandile P. Songca ◽  
Ariunbuyan Sukhbaatar ◽  
Shiro Mori ◽  
...  

ACS Omega ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. 3194-3206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Cheng ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
Lingyun He ◽  
Weiwei Liu ◽  
Yuli Chen ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joo Hee Cha ◽  
Woo Kyung Moon ◽  
Jung Eun Cheon ◽  
Young Hwan Koh ◽  
Eun Hye Lee ◽  
...  

ORL ro ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (42) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
Daniela Vrînceanu ◽  
Mihai Dumitru ◽  
Adriana Nica

Author(s):  
Alexey Surov ◽  
Hans-Jonas Meyer ◽  
Maciej Pech ◽  
Maciej Powerski ◽  
Jasan Omari ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Our aim was to provide data regarding use of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for distinguishing metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes (LN) in rectal cancer. Methods MEDLINE library, EMBASE, and SCOPUS database were screened for associations between DWI and metastatic and non-metastatic LN in rectal cancer up to February 2021. Overall, 9 studies were included into the analysis. Number, mean value, and standard deviation of DWI parameters including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of metastatic and non-metastatic LN were extracted from the literature. The methodological quality of the studies was investigated according to the QUADAS-2 assessment. The meta-analysis was undertaken by using RevMan 5.3 software. DerSimonian, and Laird random-effects models with inverse-variance weights were used to account the heterogeneity between the studies. Mean DWI values including 95% confidence intervals were calculated for metastatic and non-metastatic LN. Results ADC values were reported for 1376 LN, 623 (45.3%) metastatic LN, and 754 (54.7%) non-metastatic LN. The calculated mean ADC value (× 10−3 mm2/s) of metastatic LN was 1.05, 95%CI (0.94, 1.15). The calculated mean ADC value of the non-metastatic LN was 1.17, 95%CI (1.01, 1.33). The calculated sensitivity and specificity were 0.81, 95%CI (0.74, 0.89) and 0.67, 95%CI (0.54, 0.79). Conclusion No reliable ADC threshold can be recommended for distinguishing of metastatic and non-metastatic LN in rectal cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document