Synthesis, magnetism, electron paramagnetic resonance studies, x-ray molecular structure, and spectral properties of .mu.4-oxo-hexa-.mu.-chloro-tetrakis[(3-quinuclidinone)copper(II)]

1977 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 1530-1537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Dickinson ◽  
Fred T. Helm ◽  
W. A. Baker ◽  
T. D. Black ◽  
W. H. Watson
2006 ◽  
Vol 295 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kátia Cylene Lombardi ◽  
Antonio Salvio Mangrich ◽  
Fernando Wypych ◽  
Ubirajara Pereira Rodrigues-Filho ◽  
José L. Guimarães ◽  
...  

Crystals ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 637
Author(s):  
Natalia Tereba ◽  
Tadeusz M. Muzioł ◽  
Robert Podgajny ◽  
Grzegorz Wrzeszcz

In this paper, three new heterometallic compounds were described and compared with the molecular formula [Cu(pn)2Zn(NCS)4] (1), [Cu(N,N-Me2-en)2Zn(NCS)4] (2), [Cu(N-Me-en)2Zn(NCS)4]∙½H2O (3) where pn = 1,2−diaminopropane, N,N-Me2-en = N,N‒dimethylethylenediamine and N-Me-en = N-methylethylenediamine, respectively. The compounds mentioned above were characterized by elemental analysis, infrared (IR), electronic, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra, and magnetic studies. Crystal structures for 1 and 2 were determined by X-ray analysis. Copper(II) in these complexes adopts 4 + 2 coordination with two elongated (in 2 very long and considered as semi-coordination) Cu-S bonds. The Cu-N and Cu-S bond lengths depend on substituent position affecting steric hindrance and hence a topology of the chain. Both chains form different zigzag patterns characterized by one or two Cu-Zn distance values. Weak magnetic interaction is observed, ferromagnetic in the case of 1 and antiferromagnetic in the case of 2, due to diversity of the above structural features.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document