Novel Application of X-ray Computed Tomography:  Determination of Gas/Liquid Contact Area and Liquid Holdup in Structured Packing

2007 ◽  
Vol 46 (17) ◽  
pp. 5734-5753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian W. Green ◽  
John Farone ◽  
Julie K. Briley ◽  
R. Bruce Eldridge ◽  
Richard A. Ketcham ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Omar M. Basha ◽  
Rui Wang ◽  
Isaac K. Gamwo ◽  
Nicholas S. Siefert ◽  
Badie I. Morsi

AbstractA full-scale multi-environment Eulerian CFD model for a countercurrent packed-bed absorber with structured packing Mellapak 250Y was built in ANSYS Fluent 2019 R1 in order to model CO2 capture using physical solvents. The objective of the model is to predict the overall absorber gas-liquid internal flow profiles within the complex packing geometry, while accurately predicting the hydrodynamic parameters, such as liquid holdup and pressure drop. The gas-solid and gas-liquid drag coefficients were fitted and validated using the following experimental data by Green et al. (2006. “Hydraulic Characterization of Structured Packing via X-ray Computed Tomography”; 2007. “Novel Application of X-ray Computed Tomography: Determination of Gas/liquid Contact Area and Liquid Holdup in Structured Packing.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 46: 5734–53.): dry pressure drop, irrigated pressure drop, and liquid holdup. The validated CFD model was used to study the effect of liquid distributor design on the liquid distribution in the absorber using three distributors provided with seven, thirteen, and twenty orifices of 0.2 mm diameter. The CFD model predictions revealed that the distributor with the largest number of orifices resulted in the least liquid maldistribution in the absorber, which led to increasing the overall CO2 absorption efficiency in Selexol as a physical solvent. Also, the overall CO2 absorption efficiency decreased with increasing the superficial liquid velocity due to the shorter contact times between CO2 and Selexol in the absorber at higher superficial liquid velocities.


2014 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 333-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Ponikiewski ◽  
Jacek Katzer ◽  
Monika Bugdol ◽  
Marcin Rudzki

2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 7094-7100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harris E. Mason ◽  
Stuart D. C. Walsh ◽  
Wyatt L. DuFrane ◽  
Susan A. Carroll

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quoc P. Nguyen ◽  
Peter K. Currie ◽  
Pacelli L.J. Zitha

2021 ◽  
Vol 883 ◽  
pp. 41-48
Author(s):  
Matthias Busch ◽  
Tino Hausotte

Industrial X-ray computed tomography (XCT) is a tool for non-destructive testing and a volumetric analysis method with the ability to measure dimensions and geometry inside a component without destroying it. However, XCT is a relatively young technology in the field of dimensional metrology and thus faces several challenges. The achievement of a high measurement resolution, which is re-quired to detect small geometrical features, depends on a variety of influencing factors. In this arti-cle, the interface structural resolution (ISR) as one of the key challenges will be investigated. The two-sphere standard called the hourglass standard allows the determination of the structural resolu-tion by evaluation of the surrounding area of an ideal point contact of two spheres after the CT re-construction in form of a neck-shaped transition. Close to the contact point of the two spheres two opposing surfaces exist. Their distances from each other increase as the distance from the contact point of the two spheres increase. The determination of the distances between the spheres’ surface allows a statement about the ISR. A new developed specimen or standard with a variable gap size consisting of calibrated parallel gauge blocks allows statements about the ISR, too. Because of the higher number of probing points of the gauge block standard the results of the determined ISR are more stable compared to the hourglass standard. This paper compares the results of the computed tomography measurements for the designed interface structural resolution standard with those of the hourglass standard.


2012 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 93-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwang Yeom Kim ◽  
Tae Sup Yun ◽  
Jinhyun Choo ◽  
Dong Hun Kang ◽  
Hyu Soung Shin

AIChE Journal ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 1471-1476 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Marchot ◽  
D. Toye ◽  
A-M. Pelsser ◽  
M. Crine ◽  
G. L'Homme ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document