Correction - "Soiling and Soil Retention in Textile Fibers - Cotton Fiber-Grease-Free Carbon Block Systems"

1952 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 1401-1401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Compton ◽  
W. Hart
1953 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 418-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.J. Hart ◽  
Jack Compton

1930 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 531-543
Author(s):  
T. M. Knowland

Abstract RUBBER articles may be divided roughly into three classes: (1) pure gum, (2) hard rubber, and (3) various combinations of rubber and textile fibers. This latter class is the largest and possibly the most important of the group, and includes besides tires the bulk of mechanical goods, such as hose, belting and sheet goods of various kinds. Probably no combination of useful materials affords a wider range of possibilities than the various combinations of rubber and textile fibers. In rubber-textile combinations the cotton fiber is ordinarily used to impart tensile strength and to decrease the stretchiness of the product, while the attempt is made to retain at the same time as much resiliency as possible. Most of these combinations are of laminated construction, consisting of alternate layers of rubber compound and woven fabric, the physical properties being controlled by the construction of the fabric and the composition and cure of the rubber compound. Since cotton is usually more expensive on a volume basis than rubber, it is desirable to obtain the maximum tensile properties of the cotton fiber and to restrict its use as much as possible. That this is a difficult matter may be recalled when we compare the actual bursting strength of various mechanical goods with the so-called theoretical or calculated strength based on the additive strengths of the plied up fabrics in the fabricated article; it is at once apparent that only a small proportion of the fiber strength is effectively employed.


1953 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 158-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Compton ◽  
W.J. Hart

Author(s):  
S.A. Wight

Measurements of electrons striking the sample in the Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope (ESEM) are needed to begin to understand the effect of the presence of the gas on analytical measurements. Accurate beam current is important to x-ray microanalysis and it is typically measured with a faraday cup. A faraday cup (Figure 1) was constructed from a carbon block embedded in non-conductive epoxy with a 45 micrometer bore platinum aperture over the hole. Currents were measured with an electrometer and recorded as instrument parameters were varied.Instrument parameters investigated included working distance, chamber pressure, condenser percentage, and accelerating voltage. The conditions studied were low vacuum with gaseous secondary electron detector (GSED) voltage on; low vacuum with GSED voltage off; and high vacuum (GSED off). The base conditions were 30 kV, 667 Pa (5 Torr) water vapor, 100,000x magnification with the beam centered inside aperture, GSED voltage at 370 VDC, condenser at 50%, and working distance at 19.5 mm. All modifications of instrument parameters were made from these conditions.


Genomics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 356-365
Author(s):  
HARON Salih ◽  
Xiao Wang ◽  
Baojun Chen ◽  
Yinhua Jia ◽  
Wenfang Gong ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document