The Early Stages of the Phase Separation Dynamics in Polydisperse Polymer Blends

1994 ◽  
Vol 27 (15) ◽  
pp. 4231-4241 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Huang ◽  
M. Olvera de la Cruz

1997 ◽  
Vol 30 (15) ◽  
pp. 4459-4463 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Clarke ◽  
T. C. B. McLeish ◽  
S. Pavawongsak ◽  
J. S. Higgins




Kobunshi ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 790-793
Author(s):  
Hajime Tanaka


Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 715
Author(s):  
Miodrag J. Lukić ◽  
Felix Lücke ◽  
Teodora Ilić ◽  
Katharina Petrović ◽  
Denis Gebauer

Nucleation of minerals in the presence of additives is critical for achieving control over the formation of solids in biomineralization processes or during syntheses of advanced hybrid materials. Herein, we investigated the early stages of Fe(III) (oxy)(hydr)oxide formation with/without polyglutamic acid (pGlu) at low driving force for phase separation (pH 2.0 to 3.0). We employed an advanced pH-constant titration assay, X-ray diffraction, thermal analysis with mass spectrometry, Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. Three stages were observed: initial binding, stabilization of Fe(III) pre-nucleation clusters (PNCs), and phase separation, yielding Fe(III) (oxy)(hydr)oxide. The data suggest that organic–inorganic interactions occurred via binding of olation Fe(III) PNC species. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) analyses revealed a plausible interaction motif and a conformational adaptation of the polypeptide. The stabilization of the aqueous Fe(III) system against nucleation by pGlu contrasts with the previously reported influence of poly-aspartic acid (pAsp). While this is difficult to explain based on classical nucleation theory, alternative notions such as the so-called PNC pathway provide a possible rationale. Developing a nucleation theory that successfully explains and predicts distinct influences for chemically similar additives like pAsp and pGlu is the Holy Grail toward advancing the knowledge of nucleation, early growth, and structure formation.



Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 773
Author(s):  
Ahmad Safwan Ismail ◽  
Mohammad Jawaid ◽  
Norul Hisham Hamid ◽  
Ridwan Yahaya ◽  
Azman Hassan

Polymer blends is a well-established and suitable method to produced new polymeric materials as compared to synthesis of a new polymer. The combination of two different types of polymers will produce a new and unique material, which has the attribute of both polymers. The aim of this work is to analyze mechanical and morphological properties of bio-phenolic/epoxy polymer blends to find the best formulation for future study. Bio-phenolic/epoxy polymer blends were fabricated using the hand lay-up method at different loading of bio-phenolic (5 wt%, 10 wt%, 15 wt%, 20 wt%, and 25 wt%) in the epoxy matrix whereas neat bio-phenolic and epoxy samples were also fabricated for comparison. Results indicated that mechanical properties were improved for bio-phenolic/epoxy polymer blends compared to neat epoxy and phenolic. In addition, there is no sign of phase separation in polymer blends. The highest tensile, flexural, and impact strength was shown by P-20(biophenolic-20 wt% and Epoxy-80 wt%) whereas P-25 (biophenolic-25 wt% and Epoxy-75 wt%) has the highest tensile and flexural modulus. Based on the finding, it is concluded that P-20 shows better overall mechanical properties among the polymer blends. Based on this finding, the bio-phenolic/epoxy blend with 20 wt% will be used for further study on flax-reinforced bio-phenolic/epoxy polymer blends.



1996 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles C. Han


2010 ◽  
Vol 81 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cornish ◽  
T. Eralp ◽  
A. Shavorskiy ◽  
R. A. Bennett ◽  
G. Held ◽  
...  


2006 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 328-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuyet L. Tran ◽  
Philip K. Chan ◽  
Derick Rousseau


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document