Suicidality in Borderline Personality Disorder

Crisis ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carole Kjellander ◽  
Bruce Bongar ◽  
Ashley King

Recent research on the relationship between borderline personality disorder (BPD) and suicidal behavior is reviewed. Risk factors for attempted and completed suicide as well as the effect of the comorbidity of BPD with other Axis I and II disorders are considered. Explanations for suicidality in BPD are discussed. General assessment strategies are offered, along with treatment recommendations. Specifically, research has shown that borderline patients improve in the long-term, decreasing in suicidality, self-destructiveness, and interpersonal maladjustment, if survival is effectively managed during the turbulent years of youth. Clinical lore at times can lead clinicians to disregard the danger of suicide completion among chronically parasuicidal patients, which can prevent effective intervention during suicidal crises and result in unfortunate outcomes.

1989 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Paris ◽  
David Nowlis ◽  
Ronald Brown

One hundred patients with borderline personality disorder who were followed for a mean of 15 years were compared with 14 borderline patients who committed suicide. The most significant predictors of completed suicide were previous attempts and higher education.


2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-169 ◽  

It is clinically important to recognize both bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder (BPD) in patients seeking treatment for depression, and it is important to distinguish between the two. Research considering whether BPD should be considered part of a bipolar spectrum reaches differing conclusions. We reviewed the most studied question on the relationship between BPD and bipolar disorder: their diagnostic concordance. Across studies, approximately 10% of patients with BPD had bipolar I disorder and another 10% had bipolar II disorder. Likewise, approximately 20% of bipolar II patients were diagnosed with BPD, though only 10% of bipolar I patients were diagnosed with BPD. While the comorbidity rates are substantial, each disorder is nontheless diagnosed in the absence of the other in the vast majority of cases (80% to 90%). In studies examining personality disorders broadly, other personality disorders were more commonly diagnosed in bipolar patients than was BPD. Likewise, the converse is also true: other axis I disorders such as major depression, substance abuse, and post-traumatic stress disorder are also more commonly diagnosed in patients with BPD than is bipolar disorder. These findings challenge the notion that BPD is part of the bipolar spectrum.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S505-S505
Author(s):  
E. Gimeno ◽  
C. Chiclana

IntroductionBorderline personality disorder begins in adolescence, however, its diagnosis is subject to some controversy and tends to be underdiagnosed. Stigma associated with its diagnosis, comorbidity with other axis I disorders or the changeable sense of identity during adolescence are some of the elements that obscure the diagnosis. Increasingly, recent studies have shown the utility of prevention programs as well as instituting early intervention in adolescents, with very hopeful outcomes.ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to review the benefits derived from early prevention and intervention programs in adolescents with borderline symptoms from a cognitive analytic approach.MethodsA systematic review for scientific articles extracted from research databases including Dialnet, EBSCO, Pubmed, Unika and Scholar Google was conducted. Other high-impact studies in the field were also included.ResultsEvidence reported by reviewed articles supports Cognitive analytical therapy as one of the most successful approaches, the same as Mentalization based therapy, in the treatment of Borderline personality disorder. From this approach, prevention and early intervention have shown their effectiveness in reducing borderline symptoms and risk factors besides they contribute to interpersonal functioning improvement.ConclusionsPrevention and early intervention constitute the main pillars to prevent the potential development of Borderline personality disorder or its evolution in more complex and irreversible forms. But this intervention must be carried not only in young already diagnosed, but also in those who are on the diagnostic threshold, presenting risk factors for further development.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 699-707
Author(s):  
Maria E. Ridolfi ◽  
Christina M. Temes ◽  
Emily K. Fraser ◽  
Frances R. Frankenburg ◽  
Mary C. Zanarini

This study has two purposes. The first is to assess the rates of childhood malevolence by caretakers reported by a well-defined sample of inpatients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and comparison subjects with other personality disorders. The second purpose is to determine the relationship between reported malevolence of caretakers and possible risk factors for this experience. Two reliable interviews were administered to 290 borderline inpatients and 72 personality-disordered comparison subjects to address these aims. Malevolence was reported by a significantly higher percentage of borderline patients than comparison subjects (58% vs. 33%). In multivariate analyses, severity of other forms of abuse, severity of neglect, and a family history of a dramatic cluster personality disorder were found to significantly predict perceived malevolence. Taken together, the results of this study suggest that experiencing malevolence is common and distinguishing for BPD, and that the risk factors for reported childhood malevolence are multifactorial in nature.


1986 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 708-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Snyder ◽  
Wesley M. Pitts

The relationship of self-rated to observer-rated scales has been infrequently studied in patients with DSM-III defined borderline personality disorder. This study was designed to derminine a) the amount of correlation between these two types of rating scales in borderline patients and b) whether borderline patients scored significantly higher than dysthymic controls on self or observer-rated scales. Results indicated that self-rated scale scores were higher within the borderline group. Self and observer-rated scales were highly correlated within the borderline group. Borderline patients did not differ from controls when scores of self and observer-rated scales were compared between groups. The relationship of these results to previous findings was equivocal.


Author(s):  
Gabriele Skabeikyte ◽  
Rasa Barkauskiene

Abstract Background Research on personality pathology in adolescence has accelerated during the last decade. Among all of the personality disorders, there is strong support for the validity of borderline personality disorder (BPD) diagnosis in adolescence with comparable stability as seen in adulthood. Researchers have put much effort in the analysis of the developmental pathways and etiology of the disorder and currently are relocating their attention to the identification of the possible risk factors associated with the course of BPD symptoms during adolescence. The risk profile provided in previous systematic reviews did not address the possible development and course of BPD features across time. Having this in mind, the purpose of this systematic review is to identify the factors that are associated with the course of BPD symptoms during adolescence. Methods Electronic databases were systematically searched for prospective longitudinal studies with at least two assessments of BPD as an outcome of the examined risk factors. A total number of 14 articles from the period of almost 40 years were identified as fitting the eligibility criteria. Conclusions Factors associated with the course of BPD symptoms include childhood temperament, comorbid psychopathology, and current interpersonal experiences. The current review adds up to the knowledge base about factors that are associated with the persistence or worsening of BPD symptoms in adolescence, describing the factors congruent to different developmental periods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document