Space and Motion Stimulus-Response Correspondence (SRC) Effects in a Single Task

2016 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 297-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Styrkowiec
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Times ◽  
Distribution Analysis ◽  
Response Position ◽  
Stimulus Motion ◽  
Single Task ◽  
Stimulus Response ◽  
Spatial Stimulus ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Delta Plots ◽  
The Right

Abstract. Previous research indicated that congruency between stimulus location and response position (spatial stimulus-response correspondence [SRC]) and stimulus motion and response movement congruency (motion SRC) are distinct SRC phenomena. This study further explored this issue and tested whether these two SRC effects are independent. This was conducted by investigating these two SRC effects in a single task. A stimulus with leftward or rightward motion was presented on the left or the right side of the screen and the participant had to move the joysticks held with the left and right hands leftward or rightward in response to the stimulus color. In this setting, the stimulus and response shared two types of correspondence: spatial and motion. The results demonstrated that two SRC effects occurred and interacted (interaction evident only in reaction times [RTs]). RT distribution analysis and accuracy delta plots for each SRC effect indicated that spatial and motion SRC are distinct phenomena based on different processes.

Brain-behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 321-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Iacoboni ◽  
R. P. Woods ◽  
J. C. Mazziotta
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Left Hemisphere ◽  
Light Stimulus ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Response Compatibility ◽  
Stimulus Response ◽  
Spatial Stimulus ◽  
Right Hand ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Stimulus Response Compatibility

1. We measured relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) changes with positron emission tomography and H(2) 15O in six normal subjects repeatedly performing a spatial stimulus-response compatibility task. Subjects had two motor response conditions. They were instructed to respond with the left hand to a left visual field light stimulus and with the right hand to a right visual field light stimulus (compatible condition), and with the right hand to a left visual field light stimulus and with the left hand to a right visual field light stimulus (incompatible condition). Six rCBF measurements per condition were performed in each subject. 2. Reaction times were faster (P < 0.0005) in the compatible (287 ms) than the incompatible (339 ms) condition (spatial stimulus-response compatibility effect). A bilateral increase (P < 0.05) in rCBF in the superior parietal lobule of the two hemispheres was observed during the incompatible condition when compared with the compatible one. No rCBF decreases were observed. Reaction times correlated (P < 0.0001) with the rCBF in the two activated superior parietal lobule areas. 3. Reaction times decreased with practice according to a linear trend (P < 0.05). Practice-related linear rCBF increases (P < 0.05) were observed in the dorsolateral prefrontal, premotor, and primary motor cortex of the left hemisphere. No significant rCBF decreases were observed. 4. Practice did not affect the spatial stimulus-response compatibility effect. A parallel shortening of reaction times was observed in both compatible and incompatible conditions, in both left and right hand responses, and in both left and right visual fields. Accordingly, when rCBF was analyzed, the spatial stimulus-response compatibility by practice interaction did not show any significant activated area. 5. These findings suggest that the two activated areas in the left and right superior parietal lobules subserve the mapping of the visual stimulus spatial attributes onto the motor response spatial attributes and that the rCBF increases in the incompatible response condition represent the more complex computational remapping required when stimuli and response do not match spatially. 6. The dorsolateral prefrontal, premotor, and motor rCBF linear increases in the left hemisphere seem to reflect the effect of practice on cortical processes common to both compatible and incompatible response conditions. These cortical processes presumably strengthen the links between stimuli and responses under different stimulus-response compatibility conditions. The lateralization of the rCBF increases suggests a left hemisphere superiority in these processes.

Hemispheric Asymmetries in a Signal Detection Task

1983 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 923-929 ◽  
Author(s):  
John L. Andreassi ◽  
Charles S. Rebert ◽  
Ferol F. Larsen
Keyword(s):  
Signal Detection ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Vigilance Task ◽  
Verbal Stimulus ◽  
Right Visual Field ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
The Right ◽  
Male Subjects ◽  
Central Fixation

Reaction time and signal detection performance were measured during a 78-min. vigilance task. 12 right-handed male subjects served in two experimental sessions. Subjects focused on a central fixation point and responded to signals presented at unpredictable times in one of three locations: 2.5° to right of central fixation, central, and 2.5° to the left of center. Subjects decided whether to press a response key with either the left or right hand with each presentation. Over-all vigilance performance (signal detections and response time) was similar for left and right visual-field presentations. Evidence from reaction times indicated that responses controlled by the left hemisphere were faster to a verbal stimulus (T) while reactions controlled by the right hemisphere were faster to an apparent non-verbal stimulus, an inverted T.

Stimulus–Response Compatibility for Vertically Oriented Stimuli and Horizontally Oriented Responses: Evidence for Spatial Coding

1995 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 367-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Weeks ◽  
Robert W. Proctor ◽  
Brad Beyak
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Coding ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Response Location ◽  
Stimulus Response ◽  
Response Sets ◽  
Response Switch ◽  
Oriented Stimulus ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Active Switch ◽  
The Right

It has previously been shown that, when stimuli positioned above or below a central fixation point (“up” and “down” stimuli) are assigned to left and right responses, the stimulus–response mapping up-left/down-right is more compatible than the mapping up-right/down-left for responses executed by the left hand in the left hemispace, but this relation is reversed for responses executed by the right hand in the right hemispace. In Experiment 1, each hand responded at locations in both hemispaces to dissociate the influence of hand identity from response location, and response location was found to be the determinant of relative compatibility. In Experiment 2 responses were made at the sagittal midline, and an inactive response switch was placed to the left or right to induce coding of the active switch as right or left, respectively. This manipulation of relative location had an effect similar to, although of lesser magnitude than, that produced by physically changing location of the response switch in Experiment 1. It is argued that these results are counter to predictions of a movement-preference account and consistent with the view that spatial coding underlies compatibility effects for orthogonally oriented stimulus and response sets.

Auditory Warning Signals Affect Mechanisms of Response Selection

2010 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rico Fischer ◽  
Franziska Plessow ◽  
Andrea Kiesel
Keyword(s):  
Selective Attention ◽  
Response Selection ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Relevant Stimulus ◽  
Attention Task ◽  
Stimulus Response ◽  
Spatial Stimulus ◽  
Direct Route ◽  
Stimulus Features ◽  
Indirect Route

Irrelevant tone (accessory) stimuli facilitate performance in simple and choice reaction time tasks. In the present study, we combined accessory stimulation with a selective attention paradigm in order to investigate its influence on mechanisms of response selection. In the framework of a spatial stimulus-response compatibility task (Simon task), we tested whether accessory stimuli selectively affect bottom up triggered response activation processes (e.g., direct route processing), processing of task-relevant stimulus features (indirect route processing), or both/none. Results suggest a two-component effect of accessory stimuli within this selective attention task. First, accessory stimuli increased the Simon effect due to beneficial direct route processing. Second, accessory stimuli generally decreased reaction times indicating facilitation of indirect route processing.

Linguistic Processing and Reaction Time Differences in Stutterers and Nonstutterers

1983 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Rebekah Hand ◽  
William O. Haynes
Keyword(s):  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Decision Task ◽  
Linguistic Processing ◽  
Hemispheric Processing ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Response Modes ◽  
Field Efficiency ◽  
The Right ◽  
Visual Hemifields

Linguistic processing by the left and right cerebral hemispheres was investigated in 10 adult male stutterers and l0 matched nonstutterers. Subjects performed a lexical decision task in which nonword and real-word stimuli were presented tachistoscopically to the right and left visual hemifields. Vocal and manual reaction times to real words were measured to assess hemispheric participation in processing linguistic information and to determine differences between response modes. The stuttering group exhibited a left visual field efficiency or right hemisphere preference for this task and were slower in both vocal and manual reaction times. Ramifications for hemispheric processing theories and laryngeal dysfunction hypothesis are discussed.

Effects of Certainty and Uncertainty of Stimulus-Response Correspondence on Auditory Reaction Times

1977 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 311-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Puleo ◽  
Paul E. Sheldon
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Reaction Time ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Complex Reaction ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Stimulus Response ◽  
Auditory Cue ◽  
Male College ◽  
Initial Tendency ◽  
The Right

Complex reaction time (RT) was measured for a task in which a discriminative auditory cue designated whether the right or left hand was to be used in responding. Facilitation of monaural RT compared to binaural RT occurred on trials in which both (1) the ear stimulated corresponded to the hand specified for response and (2) each of 20 male college students had received a prior signal signifying that stimulus-response correspondence would occur on the trial. RT was slower for monaural than binaural input when the monaural stimulus was applied to the ear contralateral to the hand designated by the tonal cue regardless of a prior signal signifying that stimulus-response noncorrespondence would occur on the trial. These slower RTs were attributed to an inability of subjects to inhibit their initial tendency to react toward the source of stimulation.

Training With Direct Versus Indirect Spatial Stimulus–Response Compatibility in Combat Sports

2020 ◽  
Vol 127 (4) ◽  
pp. 722-741
Author(s):  
Vicente Luis del Campo ◽  
Jose Manuel Pajuelo Miranda ◽  
Jesús Morenas Martín
Keyword(s):  
Compatibility Condition ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Initial Reaction ◽  
Response Compatibility ◽  
Combat Sport ◽  
Perceptual Training ◽  
Stimulus Response ◽  
Spatial Stimulus ◽  
Compatibility Group ◽  
Stimulus Response Compatibility

The study examined effects of spatial stimulus–response compatibility on response time and response accuracy in 20 novice combat sport athletes. Two equivalent groups, based on initial reaction time measures, were required to perceive and move quickly and accurately in response to an unspecific visual stimulus presented on a large screen during the two types of perceptual training in eight laboratory sessions. One group reacted by moving the fist toward the stimulus location on the target (direct compatibility condition). Another group was required to move the fist away from target in the opposite direction (indirect compatibility condition). Specifically, the indirect compatibility group achieved faster reaction times than the direct compatibility group during the two posttests containing video-projected attacks of the opponents, and in one of the two posttests containing real opponents’ attacks. Results seem to reveal higher combat performance against real opponents when athletes trained with an indirect stimulus–response compatibility condition.

Role of Anterior and Posterior Attention Networks in Hemispheric Asymmetries during Lexical Decisions

1991 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 313-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsuko Nakagawa
Keyword(s):  
Left Hemisphere ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Visual Fields ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Attention Networks ◽  
Priming Task ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
The Right ◽  
Prime Target

The role of the left and right hemisphere was examined during semantic priming by antonyms, remote associates, and unrelated words. Targets presented directly to the left hemisphere showed an early facilitation and a late developing inhibition, while targets presented directly to the right hemisphere showed a late developing facilitation of strong and weak associations and little evidence of inhibition. When a visual cue was given prior to each target word, reaction times were facilitated equally in both visual fields and for all prime target relationships. When the priming task was combined with shadowing, reaction times generally increased and all evidence of inhibition in left hemisphere processing disappeared. This supported the idea that the inhibition found in the left hemisphere was due to its interaction with the anterior attention network.

Cerebral Asymmetry in Facial Affect Perception by Women: Neuropsychological Effects of Depressed Mood

1994 ◽  
Vol 79 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1667-1679 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. David Crews ◽  
David W. Harrison
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Depressed Mood ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Right Visual Field ◽  
Hemispheric Processing ◽  
Neuropsychological Effects ◽  
Arousal Theory ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
State And Trait Anxiety ◽  
The Right

40 right-handed women, half of whom had been classified with depressed mood and the other half as nondepressed, participated in a tachistoscopic study of the influence of depressed mood on the cerebral hemispheric processing of Ekman and Friesen's 1976 happy, sad, and neutral emotional faces using a forced-choice reaction-time paradigm with only happy and sad alternatives as response manipulanda. The women with depressed mood were also characterized by elevated scores on both state and trait anxiety, suggestive of an anxious-depressive state with heightened arousal. Primary findings for the tachistoscopic data indicated that women with depressed mood as compared to nondepressed women displayed significantly faster reaction times to sad faces presented in the right visual field and happy faces presented in the left visual field. These results are suggestive of differential arousal of both the left and right cerebral hemispheres in this sample of anxious-depressed women and are discussed in light of arousal theory.

scholarly journals Can Tactile Neglect Occur at an Intra-Limb Level? Vibrotactile Reaction Times in Patients with Right Hemisphere Damage

1994 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Mattingley ◽  
J. L. Bradshaw
Keyword(s):  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
The Body ◽  
Right Hemisphere Damage ◽  
Tactile Stimuli ◽  
Supine Posture ◽  
Visual Reaction ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Tactile Modality ◽  
The Right

Visual reaction time (RT) studies on patients with right hemisphere (RH) damage have demonstrated that the attentional imbalance to stimuli occupying left and right positions exists even within the “intact” ipsilesional hemifield. The purpose of the present study was to test whether such patients might also exhibit relative left-sided impairments in the tactile modality, where stimuli and responses involve the index and middle fingers of the non-hemiplegic ipsilesional hand. Eight patients with RH damage, and eight matched normal controls, were tested using a vibrotactile choice RT paradigm, with the responding hand held in prone or supine posture, and located either at the body midline, or in left or right hemispace. Patients showed significantly slower RTs with the left than the right finger in both hand postures, a difference which remained constant as a function of the hemispatial location of the responding hand. In the prone posture, patients' left finger RTs were slower than those of controls, who showed no difference between left and right finger RTs, while their right finger RTs were faster than those of controls. In the supine posture, both patients and controls exhibited slower left than right finger RTs, though in controls the left finger disadvantage was attributed to biomechanical rather than attentional factors. Patients also made more errors with left than right finger stimuli, both as failures of detection and as incorrect responses, while controls made fewer errors overall and showed no differences between fingers. These data demonstrate a bias in the distribution of attention to tactile stimuli at an intra-limb level, and suggest that the attentional imbalance created by RH damage may be supramodal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document