scholarly journals Changes in Physical Properties of Everglades Peat Soils Induced by Increased Salinity at the Laboratory Scale: Implications for Changes in Biogenic Gas Dynamics

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Sirianni ◽  
Xavier Comas
2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 400-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Mustamo ◽  
M. Hyvärinen ◽  
A.-K. Ronkanen ◽  
B. Kløve

Tropics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad KURNAIN ◽  
Tejoyuwono NOTOHADIKUSUMO ◽  
Bostaug RADJAGUKGUK

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Sirianni ◽  
Xavier Comas ◽  
Carlos Coronado-Molina ◽  
David Rudnick ◽  
Gregory J. Mount

The preparation of the undisturbed peat sample at the site must be conducted to understand its characteristics. However, the sampling process becoming difficult due to the condition of peat soils itself. Due to the limitation in gaining undisturbed sample, a study on reconstitution sample becoming more popular in term of investigating the properties of soil that represent the real site condition. The main purpose of this paper was to investigate the physical properties of undisturbed and reconstituted peat RS3.350, RS2.360, RS1.000 and RS0.425. In this study, the segregation of peat and expulsion water with the aids pre-consolidation pressure was applied to the reconstituted sample. The range value of the physical properties of reconstituted peat was varied from each type of peat classification which affected by the segregation fiber and pre-consolidation pressure effect method. The entire reconstituted peat samples were recons passing the opening sieve size 3.350mm, 2.360mm, 1.000mm and 0.425 mm and were subjected with the 50 kPa, 80 kPa and 100 kPa pre-consolidation pressures. As a result, the natural Parit Nipah peat soil was classified as hemic peat (H5). The percentage of water content, liquid limit, organic content and fiber content for the reconstituted sample is lower compared to the undisturbed peat sample; but differed from specific gravity where the percentage for the reconstituted sample was higher than the undisturbed sample. Conclusively, the segregation of peat fiber and pre-consolidation pressure methods greatly affect and change the physical properties of peat samples.


2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-166
Author(s):  
Sri Nuryani Hidayah Utami ◽  
Azwar Maas ◽  
Bostang Radjagukguk ◽  
Benito Heru Purwanto

Peat soils naturally have hydrophilic or waterloving character with highly capable of exchanging the cations and cycling the nutrients from the vegetations. This water-loving character is altered to water-repellent character in hydrophobic peat soils. This research was aimed toobserve deeply the functional bunch carrier of hydrophobic and hydrophilic peat soils as shown by FTIR spectra in relation with inherent chemical and physical properties of the soils. Five peat soils consisted of two native andartificial hydrophobic peat soils and one sample of hydrophilic peat soils were studied. Artificial hydrophobic peat soils were yielded by oven-drying the native hydrophobic peat soils at 50 oC for 10 hours. FTIR spectra can distinguish the functional bunch carrier of hydrophobic and hydrophilic peat soils. FTIR spectra of hydrophobic peat soils showed degradation of hydrophilic bunch carrier (OH and COOH) and increase of the hydrophobic bunch carrier (tying aromatic from esther and ether). Chemical analysis of the hydrophobic peat soils also indicated the decrease of OH and COOH content, decrease of CEC , soil total acidity and soil moisture content.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document