Characteristics, origins, and biosignature preservation potential of carbonate‐bearing rocks within and outside of Jezero crater

<p>Ongoing monitoring of the Gepatsch Glacier, Tirol (Austria) consists of a multifaceted, interdisciplinary project which aims to characterise short term (diurnal in the summer melt season) and longer term (annual to decadal) changes to the glacier snout and forefield in the context of a rapid retreating valley glacier. The glacial valley and forefield comprises amphibolites, para- and orthogneisses that have been smoothed and striated into whalebacks, compound bedrock-sediment bedforms (crag and tail structures), flutes, and annual moraines. The glacial sediments and landforms are undergoing incision and terrace development by meltwater streams. As part of a long term goal to characterise the rates of erosion, sedimentation, and re-deposition, we return to the same site each year in mid-July to collect airborne data with an UAV (Mavic Pro drone) that allows us to produce orthophotos and digital elevation models. We compute the daily and annual elevation changes, allowing us determine zones of erosion and deposition. Measureable evidence for erosion of flutes in the immediate glacial forefield has occurred over a 12-month time period. Till deposited within the last 20 years has undergone substantial mass wasting and re-deposition as subaerial mass flows, or reworked into stream deposits. The lee side of many whaleback structures completely lacks subglacial sediment, and contains instead a sand and gravel deposit interpreted to result from waterlain deposition. Thus, this case study area offers insight into the rates of erosion and deposition in a complex, proglacial setting, allowing some of these processes to be quantified for the first time. This approach is expected to yield a better understanding of the preservation potential of proglacial sedimentary facies, and hence their preservation potential in Earth&#8217;s sedimentary record.</p>

Download Full-text

Extreme-flood-related peat blocks: An Anthropocene analogue to ancient coal-forming environments

Journal of Sedimentary Research ◽

10.2110/jsr.2020.113 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 91 (3) ◽

pp. 243-261

Author(s):

JUAN PEDRO RODRÍGUEZ-LÓPEZ ◽

ANA R. SORIA ◽

CARLOS L. LIESA

Keyword(s):

Urban Park ◽

Peat Layer ◽

General Belief ◽

Widespread Occurrence ◽

Ebro River ◽

Large Size ◽

Extreme Flood ◽

Preservation Potential ◽

River City ◽

Artificial Channel

Abstract Coal clasts associated with extreme floods are prone to survive and maintain their large size, contrary to the general belief that distance from the parent peat layer reduces the size of transported clasts. Contrary to apparent logic, moreover, a second flood event favors the preservation potential of such soft organic clasts, this being the minimal fragmentation. An Anthropocene example from an urban park in Spain demonstrates that peat clasts up to 1 m long can survive due to flotation for a distance of almost a hundred meters and are well preserved and stabilized thanks to a second flood. These peat blocks were generated by catastrophic flooding of urban peatlands along the Ebro River (city of Zaragoza) during exceptional rainfalls in Iberia. The water flow from the Ebro River flooded the peatland at the surface of the meander, ripping up peat clasts from a shear or detachment level formed by an indurated level characterized by rounded quartzite pebbles, which acted as a hydrological discontinuity surface. Extensive evidence of the paleoflow direction is provided by oriented crushed reeds and the widespread occurrence of imbricated and thrusted peat blocks on the eroded and exposed peatland and in the main urban accumulation areas. To be specific, peat blocks and minor clasts accumulated in four areas associated with different modes of transport and topographic steps. From proximal to distal these are as follows: i) a proximal rim including thrusted peat blocks on the eroded peatland, ii) two intermediate accumulation zones associated with topographic steps in the park, characterized by peat-clast imbrication, iii) gravity-fall peat clasts deposited in an artificial channel in the park, and iv) peat rafts of more than 1 m in diameter scattered over the surface of the park (at a distance of 90 m from the eroded peatland).

Download Full-text