ENTROPY BASED RIVER DISCHARGE ESTIMATION USING ONE‐POINT VELOCITY MEASUREMENT AT 0.6D;

Author(s):  
Jitendra K. vyas ◽  
Muthiah Perumal ◽  
Tommaso Moramarco
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1851-1866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinh Thi Lan Anh ◽  
Filipe Aires

Abstract River discharge (RD) estimates are necessary for many applications, including water management, flood risk, and water cycle studies. Satellite-derived long-term GIEMS-D3 surface water extent (SWE) maps and HydroSHEDS data, at 90-m resolution, are here used to estimate several hydrological quantities at a monthly time scale over a few selected locations within the Amazon basin. Two methods are first presented to derive the water level (WL): the “hypsometric curve” and the “histogram cutoff” approaches at an 18 km × 18 km resolution. The obtained WL values are interpolated over the whole water mask using a bilinear interpolation. The two methods give similar results and validation with altimetry is satisfactory, with a correlation ranging from 0.72 to 0.89 in the seven considered stations over three rivers (i.e., Wingu, Negro, and Solimoes Rivers). River width (RW) and water volume change (WVC) are also estimated. WVC is evaluated with GRACE total water storage change, and correlations range from 0.77 to 0.88. A neural network (NN) statistical model is then used to estimate the RD based on four predictors (SWE, WL, WVC, and RW) and on in situ RD measurements. Results compare well to in situ measurements with a correlation of about 0.97 for the raw data (and 0.84 for the anomalies). The presented methodologies show the potential of historical satellite data (the combination of SWE with topography) to help estimate RD. Our study focuses here on a large river in the Amazon basin at a monthly scale; additional analyses would be required for other rivers, including smaller ones, in different environments, and at higher temporal scale.


Water ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1010
Author(s):  
Robert Clasing ◽  
Enrique Muñoz

The gauging process can be very extensive and time-consuming due to the procedures involved. Since velocity measurement time (VMT) is one of the main variables that would allow gauging times to be reduced, this study seeks to determine the optimal point VMT and, thereby, reduce the overall gauging time. An uncertainty approach based on the USGS area-velocity method and the GLUE methodology applied to eight gauging samples taken in shallow rivers located in South-central Chile was used. The average point velocity was calculated as the average of 1 to 70 randomly selected instant velocity samples (taken every one second). The time at which the uncertainty bands reached a stability criterion (according to both width and slope stability) was considered to be the optimum VMT since the variations were negligible and it does not further contribute to a less uncertain solution. Based on the results, it is concluded that the optimum point VMT is 17 s. Therefore, a point velocity measurement of 20 s is recommended as the optimal time for gauging in shallow rivers.


Author(s):  
A. Tarpanelli ◽  
L. Brocca ◽  
S. Barbetta ◽  
T. Lacava ◽  
M. Faruolo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mulugeta Genanu Kebede ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Kun Yang ◽  
Deliang Chen ◽  
Xiuping Li ◽  
...  

Reliable information about river discharge plays a key role in sustainably managing water resources and better understanding of hydrological systems. Therefore, river discharge estimation using remote sensing techniques is an ongoing research goal, especially in small, headwater catchments which are mostly ungauged due to environmental or financial limitations. Here, a novel method for river discharge estimation based entirely on remote sensing-derived parameters is presented. The model inputs include average river width, estimated from Landsat imagery by using the modified normalized difference water index (MNDWI) approach; average depth and velocity, based on empirical equations with inputs from remote sensing; channel slope from a high resolution shuttle radar topography mission digital elevation model (SRTM DEM); and channel roughness coefficient via further analysis and classification of Landsat images with support of previously published values. The discharge of the Lhasa River was then estimated based on these derived parameters and by using either the Manning equation (Model 1) or Bjerklie equation (Model 2). In general, both of the two models tend to overestimate discharge at moderate and high flows, and underestimate discharge at low flows. The overall performances of both models at the Lhasa gauge were satisfactory: comparisons with the observations yielded Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) and R2 values ≥ 0.886. Both models also performed well at the upper gauge (Tanggya) of the Lhasa River (NSE ≥ 0.950) indicating the transferability of the methodology to river cross-sections with different morphologies, thus demonstrating the potential to quantify streamflow entirely from remote sensing data in poorly-gauged or ungauged rivers on the Tibetan Plateau.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document