Unexpected features of the ion precipitation in the so-called cleft/low-latitude boundary layer region: Association with sunward convection and occurrence on open field lines

1993 ◽  
Vol 98 (A7) ◽  
pp. 11161 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Nishida ◽  
T. Mukai ◽  
H. Hayakawa ◽  
A. Matsuoka ◽  
K. Tsuruda ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 2169-2178 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Pryse ◽  
R. W. Sims ◽  
J. Moen ◽  
K. Oksavik

Abstract. A case study is presented that concerns the footprints of the low-latitude boundary layer in the high-latitude ionosphere. The measurements were made near local magnetic noon in summertime under conditions of Bz>0 and small clock angle. Of particular interest are particle fluxes measured in the region by the NOAA-12 satellite that revealed energetic (>30 keV) electrons, characteristic of trapped particles, together with a population of softer precipitating magnetosheath particles. The particle energy-distribution was distinct from those identifying the central plasma sheet at lower latitudes. On its poleward side the layer extended to at least the latitude of the polar cap boundary as identified in ion flows and electron densities measured by the EISCAT Svalbard radar. It is proposed that the particles of the low-latitude boundary layer occurred on newly-closed magnetic field lines, which were formed by the closure of open polar cap field by lobe reconnection in both Northern and Southern Hemispheres.


1994 ◽  
Vol 99 (A9) ◽  
pp. 17367 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. R. Lyons ◽  
M. Schulz ◽  
D. C. Pridmore-Brown ◽  
J. L. Roeder

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 1501-1514 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lockwood

Abstract. Numerical simulations are presented of the ion distribution functions seen by middle-altitude spacecraft in the low-latitude boundary layer (LLBL) and cusp regions when reconnection is, or has recently been, taking place at the equatorial magnetopause. From the evolution of the distribution function with time elapsed since the field line was opened, both the observed energy/observation-time and pitch-angle/energy dispersions are well reproduced. Distribution functions showing a mixture of magnetosheath and magnetospheric ions, often thought to be a signature of the LLBL, are found on newly opened field lines as a natural consequence of the magnetopause effects on the ions and their flight times. In addition, it is shown that the extent of the source region of the magnetosheath ions that are detected by a satellite is a function of the sensitivity of the ion instrument . If the instrument one-count level is high (and/or solar-wind densities are low), the cusp ion precipitation detected comes from a localised region of the mid-latitude magnetopause (around the magnetic cusp), even though the reconnection takes place at the equatorial magnetopause. However, if the instrument sensitivity is high enough, then ions injected from a large segment of the dayside magnetosphere (in the relevant hemisphere) will be detected in the cusp. Ion precipitation classed as LLBL is shown to arise from the low-latitude magnetopause, irrespective of the instrument sensitivity. Adoption of threshold flux definitions has the same effect as instrument sensitivity in artificially restricting the apparent source regionKey words. Low-latitude boundary layer · Cusp regions · Open magnetosphere model · Mid-altitudes


2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 1065-1088 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. M. Bauer ◽  
R. A. Treumann ◽  
W. Baumjohann

Abstract. We analyze 22 AMPTE/IRM crossings of the day-side low-latitude boundary layer for which a dense outer part can be distinguished from a dilute inner part. Whereas the plasma in the outer boundary layer (OBL) is dominated by solar wind particles, the partial densities of solar wind and magnetospheric particles are comparable in the inner boundary layer (IBL). For 11 events we find a reasonable agreement between observed plasma flows and those predicted by the tangential stress balance of an open magnetopause. Thus, we conclude that, at least in these cases, the OBL is formed by a local magnetic reconnection. The disagreement with the tangential stress balance in the other 11 cases might be due to reconnection being time-dependent and patchy. The north-south component of the proton bulk velocity in the boundary layer is, on average, directed toward high latitudes for both low and high magnetic shear across the magnetopause. This argues clearly against the possibility that the dayside low-latitude boundary layer is populated with solar wind plasma primarily from the cusps. "Warm", counterstreaming electrons that originate primarily from the magnetosheath and have a field-aligned temperature that is higher than the electron temperature in the magnetosheath by a factor of 1–5, are a characteristic feature of the IBL. Profiles of the proton bulk velocity and the density of hot ring current electrons provide evidence that the IBL is on closed field lines. Part of the IBL may be on newly opened field lines. Using the average spectra of electric and magnetic fluctuations in the boundary layer, we estimate the diffusion caused by lower hybrid drift instability, gyroresonant pitch angle scattering, or kinetic Alfvén wave turbulence. We find that cross-field diffusion cannot transport solar wind plasma into the OBL or IBL at a rate that would account for the thickness ( ~ 1000 km) of these sublayers. On the duskside, the dawn-dusk component of the proton bulk velocity in the IBL and magnetosphere is, on average, directed from the nightside toward local noon. Formation of the IBL may also be due to mechanisms operating in the magnetotail.Key words. Magnetospheric physics (magnetopause, cusp and boundary layer; magnetospheath)


Author(s):  
Charles F. Kennel

This chapter describes how the magnetosphere is shaped by the tangential shear stress exerted at the magnetopause by collisionless viscosity. In Section 4.2, we discuss the low-latitude boundary layer (LLBL), which contains plasma of solar wind origin that has been transported across the magnetopause current layer. The velocity shear in the LLBL drives field-aligned currents into the ionosphere on the morning side and out of the ionosphere on the evening side (Section 4.3). These currents are of the appropriate sense to drive two-cell convection in the highlatitude ionosphere. The footprint of the LLBL in the ionosphere to which the field aligned currents connect is clearly identifiable by its characteristic particle precipitation (Section 4.4). The shear in the LLBL also generates 1-20 mHz PC 4- 5 micropulsations whose polarizations, tailward propagation, and phase speeds are consistent with the Kelvin-Helmholtz (K-H) instability (Section 4.5). The K-H vortices may couple to “vortex auroras” in the local afternoon sector of the auroral oval (Section 4.6). Vortex auroral dissipation may be responsible for a morningevening asymmetry in the viscous interaction and its manifestations. Organized vortical flows have been observed not only next to the magnetopause, but also near the center of the plasma sheet, accompanied by local quasiperiodic magnetic field oscillations and PC 5 micropulsations on the ground (Section 4.7). In Section 4.8, we discuss observations of a thick boundary layer flow on closed field lines next to the magnetopause 220 RE downstream. This puts us in a position to estimate the rates of particle and energy injection into the magnetosphere due to the viscous interaction (Section 4.9). Spacecraft crossings of the magnetopause last from a few seconds to a few minutes and are characterized by a rapid, distinct rotation of the magnetic field and striking changes in plasma density, pressure, flow velocity, composition, and energetic particle distribution (Williams, 1979a; 1980; Williams et al., 1979). A broader boundary layer lies just inside the magnetopause. The so-called low-latitude boundary layer was first identified at 18 RE radial distance in the magnetotail using Vela 4B (Hones et al., 1972) and Vela 5 and 6 (Akasofu et al., 1973b) low-energy plasma measurements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document