Formation of cluster roots and mycorrhizal status of Comptonia peregrina and Myrica pensylvanica in Maine, USA*

1997 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 680-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd M. Hurd ◽  
Christa R. Schwintzer
Bothalia ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Allsopp ◽  
W. D. Stock

A survey of the mycorrhizal status of plants growing in the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa was undertaken to assess the range of mycorrhizal types and their dominance in species characteristic of this region. Records were obtained by ex­amining the root systems of plants growing in three Cape lowland vegetation types, viz. West Coast Strandveld, West Coast Renosterveld and Sand Plain Lowland Fynbos for mycorrhizas, as well as by collating literature records of mycorrhizas on plants growing in the region. The mycorrhizal status of 332 species is listed, of which 251 species are new records. Members of all the important families in this region have been examined. Mycorrhizal status appears to be associated mainly with taxonomic position of the species. Extrapolating from these results, we conclude that 62% of the flora of the Cape Floristic Region form vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas, 23% have no mycorrhizas, 8% are ericoid mycorrhizal, 2% form orchid mycorrhizas, whereas the mycorrhizal status of 4% of the flora is unknown. There were no indigenous ectomycor- rhizal species. The proportion of non-mycorrhizal species is high compared to other ecosystems. In particular, the lack of mycorrhizas in several important perennial families in the Cape Floristic Region is unusual. The diversity of nutrient acquir­ing adaptations, including the range of mycorrhizas and cluster roots in some non-mycorrhizal families, may promote co­existence of plants in this species-rich region.


2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 191-199
Author(s):  
Mabel Delgado ◽  
Carlos Henríquez-Castillo ◽  
Alejandra Zuñiga-Feest ◽  
Francisco Sepúlveda ◽  
Rodrigo Hasbún ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 447 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 85-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianmin Shi ◽  
David Strack ◽  
Felipe E. Albornoz ◽  
Zhongming Han ◽  
Hans Lambers

Mycorrhiza ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Cristina S. Andrade ◽  
Maike H. Queiroz ◽  
Ricardo Alberto L. Hermes ◽  
Vetúria L. Oliveira

2000 ◽  
Vol 146 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. VIERHEILIG ◽  
R. BENNETT ◽  
G. KIDDLE ◽  
M. KALDORF ◽  
J. LUDWIG-MÜLLER

Mycorrhiza ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 687-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. A. Dickie ◽  
M. M. Thomas ◽  
P. J. Bellingham

Mycorrhiza ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Fracchia ◽  
Adriana Aranda ◽  
Analia Gopar ◽  
Vanesa Silvani ◽  
Laura Fernandez ◽  
...  

Horticulturae ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 302
Author(s):  
Miguel A. Quiñones ◽  
Susana Fajardo ◽  
Mercedes Fernández-Pascual ◽  
M. Mercedes Lucas ◽  
José J. Pueyo

Two white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) cultivars were tested for their capacity to accumulate mercury when grown in Hg-contaminated soils. Plants inoculated with a Bradyrhizobium canariense Hg-tolerant strain or non-inoculated were grown in two highly Hg-contaminated soils. All plants were nodulated and presented a large number of cluster roots. They accumulated up to 600 μg Hg g−1 DW in nodules, 1400 μg Hg g−1 DW in roots and 2550 μg Hg g−1 DW in cluster roots. Soil, and not cultivar or inoculation, was accountable for statistically significant differences. No Hg translocation to leaves or seeds took place. Inoculated L. albus cv. G1 plants were grown hydroponically under cluster root-promoting conditions in the presence of Hg. They accumulated about 500 μg Hg g−1 DW in nodules and roots and up to 1300 μg Hg g−1 DW in cluster roots. No translocation to the aerial parts occurred. Bioaccumulation factors were also extremely high, especially in soils and particularly in cluster roots. To our knowledge, Hg accumulation in cluster roots has not been reported to date. Our results suggest that inoculated white lupin might represent a powerful phytoremediation tool through rhizosequestration of Hg in contaminated soils. Potential uptake and immobilization mechanisms are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document