Comparison of endothelial cell density estimated by contact and non-contact specular microscopy

2000 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Isager ◽  
Jesper O. Hjortdal ◽  
Suping Guo ◽  
Niels Ehlers
Author(s):  
Bhuvaneshwari Namitha ◽  
Munusamy Rajendran Chitra ◽  
Mathevan Bhavya ◽  
Periasamy Parikumar ◽  
Shojiro Katoh ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose McCarey-Kaufman’s (MK) medium and Optisol-GS medium are the most commonly employed media for human donor corneal preservation. In this study, we evaluated the preservation efficacy of discarded human donor corneas using a Thermo-reversible gelation polymer (TGP) added to these two media. Methods Thirteen human corneal buttons collected from deceased donors, which were otherwise discarded due to low endothelial cell density (ECD) were used. They were stored in four groups: MK medium, MK medium with TGP, Optisol-GS and Optisol-GS with TGP at 4 °C for 96 h. Slit lamp examination and specular microscopy were performed. Corneal limbal tissues from these corneas were then cultured using explant methodology one with and the other without TGP scaffold, for 21 days. Results MK + TGP and Optisol-GS + TGP preserved corneas better than without TGP, which was observed by maintenance of ECD which was significantly higher in Optisol-GS + TGP than MK + TGP (p-value = 0.000478) and corneal thickness remaining the same for 96 h. Viable corneal epithelial cells could be grown from the corneas stored only in MK + TGP and Optisol-GS + TGP. During culture, the TGP scaffold helped maintain the native epithelial phenotype and progenitor/stem cell growth was confirmed by RT-PCR characterization. Conclusion TGP reconstituted with MK and Optisol—GS media yields better preservation of human corneal buttons in terms of relatively higher ECD maintenance and better in vitro culture outcome of corneal limbal tissue. This method has the potential to become a standard donor corneal transportation-preservation methodology and it can also be extended to other tissue or organ transportation upon further validation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-182
Author(s):  
Natàlia Coyo ◽  
Marta Leiva ◽  
Daniel Costa ◽  
Rafael Molina ◽  
Olga Nicolás ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nagaraj G. ◽  
Anasuya Sangaraj Desai ◽  
Nagesh Jayaram

Background: Diabetes mellitus is associated with structural changes in corneal endothelial cells and their thickness. The present study was done to compare the endothelial cell density (ECD), central corneal thickness (CCT) and morphology in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Minto Ophthalmic hospital, BMC and RI Bangalore for a period of 20 months (October 2013 - May 2015). A total of 200 study subjects, 100 diabetics and 100 non-diabetic age matched controls were selected, and complete timed ophthalmic evaluation was performed. Specular microscopy was performed on all patients for endothelial cell count assessment and corneal thickness was measured by Pachymeter. The data was analyzed and represented using descriptive statistics. ‘t’ test was used for comparing the two groups.Results: The mean endothelial cell density in diabetic group was significantly lower (2438.73±250.23cells/mm2) compared to non-diabetic group (2599.88±168.16cells/mm2) (p<0.0001). The mean Central corneal thickness in diabetic group was significantly higher (518.40±28.13 μm) compared to control group (490.14±24.31 μm) (p<0.001). The Co-efficient of variation percentage of the diabetics was higher than the non-diabetics but this difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The hexagonality percentage was significantly lower in diabetic group compared to the controls suggesting less pleomorphism in the diabetic group.Conclusions: The study concludes that the endothelial cell density was lower and central corneal thickness was higher in diabetic patients compared with the non-diabetics. The altered endothelial morphology was significantly seen in the form of pleomorphism (hexagonality) but polymegathism was not significantly altered.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Napaporn Tananuvat ◽  
Natawan Khumchoo

Abstract Background: This study aimed to determine the influence of age on central corneal thickness and corneal endothelial morphology as well as to identify the relationship between them in normal Thai eyes.Methods: Non-contact specular microscopy was performed in volunteers stratified into seven age groups ranging from 11-88 years. The corneal endothelial parameters studied included central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficient of variation in cell size (CV), cell area (CA) and percentage of regular hexagonal cells.Results: In a total of 501 subjects (1002 eyes), the mean age was 43.12 ± 18.80 years and 347(69.3%) were females. The mean CCT, ECD, CV, CA, and hexagonality was 533.80 ± 33.00 μm, 2,732±258 cell/mm2, 37.61 ± 6.76%, 369.04 ± 37.90 mm, and 49.03% ± 7.53%, respectively. There was a statistically significant inverse correlation between age and CCT (r = -0.212, P <0.001), ECD (r = -0.484, P <0.001), and hexagonality (r = -0.193, P <0.001). The estimate rate of endothelial cell loss was 0.2% per year, whereas CV and CA had statistically significant correlation with age (r = 0.200, P <0.001 and r = 0.475, P <0.001). CCT correlated directly with ECD (r = 0.177, P <0.001).Conclusion: Normative data for corneal endothelial morphology in healthy Thai eyes showed that ECD, CCT, and hexagonality were significantly decreased, while CV and CA were increased with aging. The central corneal thickness was correlated with the endothelial cell density.


Author(s):  
Mayumi Minami ◽  
Etsuo Chihara

Abstract Purpose To determine between-method differences in corneal endothelial cell parameters using center and automated methods of non-contact specular microscopy (CellCheck software of Konan, Inc.) in glaucomatous eyes. Methods We analyzed the central corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) of 245 glaucomatous eyes using center (ECD-Ce) and automated methods (ECD-Au). Based on the ECD-Ce, we allocated subjects to Groups 1 to 10 (at 250 cells/mm2 intervals) and evaluated the ECD, coefficient of variation in cell area (CV), and percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX). Results There was a close correlation (r = 0.91) between the ECD values measured using both methods. However, ECD-Au were significantly higher than those measured by the center method when ECD-Ce was less than 2500 (in Groups 1 to 8; P < 0.001 to P = 0.006). The regression equation of (ECD-Au—ECD-Ce) = 1028–0.397*ECD-Ce shows greater deviation in eyes with lower ECD, and this difference became 0 when ECD -Ce was 2593 cells/mm2. None of the 44 subjects with an ECD-Ce of < 1000 cells/mm2 recorded an ECD-Au < 1000 cells/mm2. Compared with the center method, the automated method had higher and lower median CV and HEX values, respectively (P < 0.001). The between-method differences in both CV and HEX were negatively correlated with ECD-Ce (r = −0.49, P < 0.001 and r = −0.25, P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion The automated method of the CellCheck software overestimates ECD in eyes with lower ECD values and may overlook risk of corneal decompensation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document