Role of unconditioned and conditioned drug effects in the self-administration of opiates and stimulants.

1984 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Stewart ◽  
Harriet de Wit ◽  
Roelof Eikelboom
2020 ◽  
pp. 16-58
Author(s):  
Anna Hájková

This chapter examines the administration of the ghetto, the most complex and largest Jewish self-administration per capita in German-occupied Europe. It also offers background on the German and Austrian SS, who controlled but did not administer the ghetto. The Theresienstadt bureaucracy developed its own politics, wherein the ethnicity of functionaries carried as much weight as belonging to one of the often competing departments of the self-administration. The chapter explores the agency of the Jewish functionaries vis-à-vis the SS, and how they interacted with and were perceived by ordinary prisoners. In doing so it contributes to the debate on Jewish Councils. It also discusses the role of Leo Baeck and shows that he was a skillful, occasionally cunning functionary. Finally, the chapter discusses the Jewish informers, their motivation, and their contributions to the German running of the ghetto.


2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 993-1010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura L. Peoples ◽  
Daniel Cavanaugh

Learning theories of drug addiction propose that the disorder is, at least in part, attributable to drug effects on accumbal mechanisms that are normally involved in reward-related learning. The neurophysiological mechanisms that might transduce such a drug effect on accumbal mechanisms have yet to be identified. Previous studies showed that a population of accumbal neurons exhibit phasic excitatory responses time locked to cocaine-reinforced lever presses during intravenous cocaine self-administration sessions (neurons referred to as lever-press neurons). Most of the same neurons, like the majority of accumbal neurons, also show a decrease in average firing rate during the drug self-administration session. Evidence indicates that the phasic firing patterns transmit information related to drug-reward-related events. On the other hand, the decreases in average firing reflect a primary pharmacological effect of self-administered cocaine. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that the phasic firing associated with drug seeking (i.e., signal) is less sensitive than other accumbal firing (i.e., background) to the inhibitory effect of cocaine. During intravenous cocaine self-administration sessions, 45 of 68 neurons showed a decrease in average firing during the self-administration session relative to a predrug baseline period. Fourteen neurons showed both an inhibition in average firing and an excitatory phasic response. For these 14 neurons, signal either remained equal to the average predrug firing rate or exceeded the predrug firing rate during the self-administration session. For the same neurons, background firing generally fell below average predrug firing. The differential changes in signal and background were associated with an increase in the ratio of signal-to-background for the individual neurons. Moreover, the relatively unique resistance of signal to inhibition was associated with an increase in the ratio of signal firing of all lever-press neurons relative to the background firing of all recorded neurons. This type of differential inhibition in signal and background firing might be expected to increase the relative influence of the drug-reward-related signals on accumbal-related neural circuits and differentially influence susceptibility of drug- and non-drug-reward-related synaptic and neural responses to neuroplasticity. It thus represents a mechanism by which inhibitory effects of self-administered drug might amplify the accumbal contribution to behavior and learning and potentially contribute to drug addiction.


Methodology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Gerich ◽  
Roland Lehner

Although ego-centered network data provide information that is limited in various ways as compared with full network data, an ego-centered design can be used without the need for a priori and researcher-defined network borders. Moreover, ego-centered network data can be obtained with traditional survey methods. However, due to the dynamic structure of the questionnaires involved, a great effort is required on the part of either respondents (with self-administration) or interviewers (with face-to-face interviews). As an alternative, we will show the advantages of using CASI (computer-assisted self-administered interview) methods for the collection of ego-centered network data as applied in a study on the role of social networks in substance use among college students.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Donnelly ◽  
Radmila Prislin ◽  
Ryan Nicholls
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Ramona Bobocel ◽  
Russell E. Johnson ◽  
Joel Brockner

1972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelis Bakker ◽  
Albert S. Carlin ◽  
Robert Heaton ◽  
Reese T. Jones ◽  
Theodore X. Barber
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Chambers ◽  
Nick Epley ◽  
Paul Windschitl
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara Feldman

This paper is a contribution to the growing literature on the role of projective identification in understanding couples' dynamics. Projective identification as a defence is well suited to couples, as intimate partners provide an ideal location to deposit unwanted parts of the self. This paper illustrates how projective identification functions differently depending on the psychological health of the couple. It elucidates how healthier couples use projective identification more as a form of communication, whereas disturbed couples are inclined to employ it to invade and control the other, as captured by Meltzer's concept of "intrusive identification". These different uses of projective identification affect couples' capacities to provide what Bion called "containment". In disturbed couples, partners serve as what Meltzer termed "claustrums" whereby projections are not contained, but imprisoned or entombed in the other. Applying the concept of claustrum helps illuminate common feelings these couples express, such as feeling suffocated, stifled, trapped, held hostage, or feeling as if the relationship is killing them. Finally, this paper presents treatment challenges in working with more disturbed couples.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document