Personality, Character, and Character Structure Revisited

1995 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 1053-1054
Author(s):  
Ruth Ochroch
Keyword(s):  
Character Structure

Character in context: Character structure among United States Military Academy cadets

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 439-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Schmid Callina ◽  
Brian Burkhard ◽  
Hillary S. Schaefer ◽  
Jeremiah Powers ◽  
Elise D. Murray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United States Military Academy ◽  
United States Military ◽  
Military Academy ◽  
Character Structure

scholarly journals # Pillar of Defense: Using Social Media to Manage Impressions of Conflict: A Case Study of the November 2012 Israel-Hamas conflict

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelena Djurkic
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Content Analysis ◽  
Impression Management ◽  
Armed Conflict ◽  
Character Structure ◽  
Military Involvement ◽  
Reputation Risk ◽  
Twitter Account ◽  
Israel Defense Forces

Threats to reputation can destroy a brand. Communicating effectively during a conflict can help to manage negative impressions that expose brands to reputation risk. This is important now more than ever as organizations—and nations—turn to Twitter to address various publics. The rigid 140-character structure of Twitter thus necessitates the creation of sound bites that act as productive texts to address multiple rhetorical objectives simultaneously. An examination of the Israel Defense Forces’ (IDF) Twitter account through sentiment and content analysis shows evidence that the Force took a significantly defensive approach to impression management of Operation Pillar of Defense in November 2012. There is evidence that Israel sought to re-frame public impression of its military involvement from aggressor to defender in the armed conflict. Codes discovered in the analysis suggest that the IDF tried to justify force, avoid responsibility and establish legitimacy of its operations.

scholarly journals # Pillar of Defense: Using Social Media to Manage Impressions of Conflict: A Case Study of the November 2012 Israel-Hamas conflict

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelena Djurkic
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Content Analysis ◽  
Impression Management ◽  
Armed Conflict ◽  
Character Structure ◽  
Military Involvement ◽  
Reputation Risk ◽  
Twitter Account ◽  
Israel Defense Forces

Threats to reputation can destroy a brand. Communicating effectively during a conflict can help to manage negative impressions that expose brands to reputation risk. This is important now more than ever as organizations—and nations—turn to Twitter to address various publics. The rigid 140-character structure of Twitter thus necessitates the creation of sound bites that act as productive texts to address multiple rhetorical objectives simultaneously. An examination of the Israel Defense Forces’ (IDF) Twitter account through sentiment and content analysis shows evidence that the Force took a significantly defensive approach to impression management of Operation Pillar of Defense in November 2012. There is evidence that Israel sought to re-frame public impression of its military involvement from aggressor to defender in the armed conflict. Codes discovered in the analysis suggest that the IDF tried to justify force, avoid responsibility and establish legitimacy of its operations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document