An Academic Contribution to the Debate on Public Education Reforms

1989 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 661-662
Author(s):  
Deborah Stipek
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Susan L. Moffitt ◽  
Cadence Willse ◽  
Kelly B. Smith ◽  
David K. Cohen

Vast disparities between and within American states’ responses to the COVID-19 pandemic have evoked renewed attention to whether greater centralization might enhance investments in subnational capacity and remedy subnational inequalities or instead erode subnational organizational capacity. Developments in American public education (1997–2015) offer perspective on this puzzle, which we examine by applying interrupted time series analysis to a novel dataset to assess the implications of centralization on subnational investments in administrative and technical capacity, two dimensions of organizational capacity. We find simultaneous subnational erosion in administrative capacity and growth in technical capacity following centralization, both of which appear concentrated in low-poverty areas despite centralization’s explicit antipoverty purposes. Public education reforms highlight both the challenge of dismantling subnational inequality through centralization and the need for future research on policy designs that enable centralization to yield subnational capacity that is able to remedy inequality.


Academia Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kadirov T ◽  
Aminov I.B

This article discusses the purpose of public education reforms in the country, the conditions that enable teachers of specific sciences to enhance the competence of information technology. On this case, it concludes with outcomes and shortcomings as the whole


1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 426-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Guskey ◽  
Ben R. Oldham

Comprehensive education reforms are crafted by legislators and policy makers to address multiple aspects of the public education system. Although individual components of such initiatives may appear promising, little thought typically is given to inconsistencies that may result from implementing multiple reform components simultaneously. This article describes some of the unintended consequences that have come about as a result of inconsistencies between and within components in Kentucky's systemic education reform. It is argued that policy makers must give serious attention to these inconsistencies and their consequences for modern reform efforts to succeed in bringing about the improvements for which they are intended.


2010 ◽  
Vol 43 (17) ◽  
pp. 71
Author(s):  
JANE ANDERSON

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document