Neuropsychological effects of closed head injury in older adults: A comparison with Alzheimer's disease.

1996 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felicia C. Goldstein ◽  
Harvey S. Levin ◽  
Vicki J. Roberts ◽  
William P. Goldman ◽  
Ari S. Kalechstein ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. S121-S121
Author(s):  
Kristyn Alissa Bates ◽  
Alan Harvey ◽  
Ralph Martins ◽  
Robert Vink

1994 ◽  
Vol 57 (8) ◽  
pp. 961-966 ◽  
Author(s):  
F C Goldstein ◽  
H S Levin ◽  
R M Presley ◽  
J Searcy ◽  
A R Colohan ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felicia C. Goldstein ◽  
Harvey S. Levin ◽  
William P. Goldman ◽  
Ari D. Kalechstein ◽  
Allison N. Clark ◽  
...  

1981 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 374-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Beukelman ◽  
Kathryn M. Yorkston ◽  
Sandra C. Gorhoff ◽  
Patricia M. Mitsuda ◽  
V. Talley Kenyon

The purpose of this study was to document aspects of successful Canon Communicator use by 13 subjects. Questionnaires were completed by the speech-language pathologists serving these individuals. Subjects ranged in age from 17 to 64 years. They had used the Canon as a communication augmentation device from 2 to 24 months. All were either anarthric or severely dysarthric as a result of a neurological disorder (cerebral palsy, bilateral CVA, closed head injury, ALS) but none were diagnosed as aphasic. The decision to recommend the Canon was made more rapidly for older adults. Although a majority of the subjects used more than one communication system, all subjects for whom the Canon remained appropriate (11 of 13) continued to use this device more frequently than other systems. No malfunction other than power supply system was reported.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen M. Kelley ◽  
Larry L. Jacoby

Abstract Cognitive control constrains retrieval processing and so restricts what comes to mind as input to the attribution system. We review evidence that older adults, patients with Alzheimer's disease, and people with traumatic brain injury exert less cognitive control during retrieval, and so are susceptible to memory misattributions in the form of dramatic levels of false remembering.


Author(s):  
Eun Jin Paek ◽  
Si On Yoon

Purpose Speakers adjust referential expressions to the listeners' knowledge while communicating, a phenomenon called “audience design.” While individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) show difficulties in discourse production, it is unclear whether they exhibit preserved partner-specific audience design. The current study examined if individuals with AD demonstrate partner-specific audience design skills. Method Ten adults with mild-to-moderate AD and 12 healthy older adults performed a referential communication task with two experimenters (E1 and E2). At first, E1 and participants completed an image-sorting task, allowing them to establish shared labels. Then, during testing, both experimenters were present in the room, and participants described images to either E1 or E2 (randomly alternating). Analyses focused on the number of words participants used to describe each image and whether they reused shared labels. Results During testing, participants in both groups produced shorter descriptions when describing familiar images versus new images, demonstrating their ability to learn novel knowledge. When they described familiar images, healthy older adults modified their expressions depending on the current partner's knowledge, producing shorter expressions and more established labels for the knowledgeable partner (E1) versus the naïve partner (E2), but individuals with AD were less likely to do so. Conclusions The current study revealed that both individuals with AD and the control participants were able to acquire novel knowledge, but individuals with AD tended not to flexibly adjust expressions depending on the partner's knowledge state. Conversational inefficiency and difficulties observed in AD may, in part, stem from disrupted audience design skills.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document