"Impact of gender role conflict, traditional masculinity ideology, alexithymia, and age on men's attitudes toward psychological help seeking": Erratum.

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 192-192
Author(s):  
Jill M. Berger ◽  
Ronald F. Levant ◽  
Katharine Kaye McMillan ◽  
William Kelleher ◽  
Al Sellers
Sex Roles ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 33 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 77-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew F. Wisch ◽  
James R. Mahalik ◽  
Jeffrey A. Hayes ◽  
Elizabeth A. Nutt

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Wahto ◽  
Joshua K. Swift

Despite a comparable need, research has indicated that on average men hold more negative attitudes toward psychological help seeking than women. Several researchers have suggested that the gender gap in service use and attitudes could be addressed through efforts to better market psychological services to men; however, a limited number of studies have tested this hypothesis. This study examined whether altering the labels for mental health providers (psychologist or counselor), settings (mental health clinic or counseling center), and treatments (problem or feeling focused) could result in less perceived stigma (social and self) by men. Participants, 165 male college students, were asked to read one of eight randomly assigned vignettes that described a man who was experiencing symptoms of depression and was considering seeking help. The vignettes differed in the labels that were used to describe the help that was being considered. Participants then completed measures assessing the stigma (self and social) associated with the treatment, and their preexisting experience of gender-role conflict and attitudes toward psychological help seeking. In summary, perceived stigma did not depend on the type of label that was used; however, 59% of the variance in attitudes was predicted by self-stigma (uniquely explaining 11%), gender-role conflict (uniquely explaining 10%), and social stigma (uniquely explaining 5%). Specifically, higher levels of gender-role conflict, social stigma, and self-stigma were associated with more negative attitudes toward psychological help seeking. Based on the demographics of the sample, these findings primarily have implications for Caucasian college-educated young adult men. Further limitations with the study and recommendations for future research are discussed.


2007 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Blazina ◽  
Maribel A. Cordova ◽  
Stewart Pisecco ◽  
Anna G. Settle

This study investigated the Gender Role Conflict Scale-Adolescent Version (GRCS-A) and its relationship with the Gender Role Conflict Scale (GRCS), the measure from which it was adapted. Significant correlations between the adult and adolescent versions provided support for the concurrent validity of the GRCS-A. Further analyses revealed that two other measures of male masculinity, the Adolescent Masculinity Ideology in Relationships Scale (AMIRS) and Male Role Attitudes Scale (MRAS), are also significantly related to the GRCS-A. Implications for future research and clinical use are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document