Supplemental Material for Binge Eating For Sucrose Is Time of Day Dependent and Independent of Food Restriction: Effects on Mesolimbic Structures

2020 ◽  
Vol 134 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-281
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Iván Osnaya-Ramírez ◽  
Madahi Palma-Gómez ◽  
Carolina Escobar

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomaz Martini ◽  
Jürgen A. Ripperger ◽  
Rohit Chavan ◽  
Michael Stumpe ◽  
Citlalli Netzahualcoyotzi ◽  
...  

Daily recurring events can be predicted by animals based on their internal circadian timing system. However, independently from the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), the central pacemaker of the circadian system in mammals, restriction of food access to a particular time of day elicits food anticipatory activity (FAA). This suggests an involvement of other central and/or peripheral clocks as well as metabolic signals in this behavior. One of the metabolic signals that is important for FAA under combined caloric and temporal food restriction is β-hydroxybutyrate (βOHB). Here we show that the monocarboxylate transporter 1 (Mct1), which transports ketone bodies such as βOHB across membranes of various cell types, is involved in FAA. In particular, we show that lack of the Mct1 gene in the liver, but not in neuronal or glial cells, reduces FAA in mice. This is associated with a reduction of βOHB levels in the blood. Our observations suggest an important role of ketone bodies and its transporter Mct1 in FAA under caloric and temporal food restriction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta G. Anversa ◽  
Erin J. Campbell ◽  
Sarah S. Ch'ng ◽  
Andrea Gogos ◽  
Andrew J. Lawrence ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 409-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Polivy ◽  
Sharon B. Zeitlin ◽  
C. Peter Herman ◽  
A. Lynne Beal

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 342-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Lowe ◽  
Ashley A. Witt ◽  
Stephanie L. Grossman

1988 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. B. Lawrence ◽  
M. C. Appleby ◽  
H. A. Macleod

AbstractOperant conditioning techniques were used to measure the feeding motivation (hunger) of pigs restricted to the low food levels used under certain commercial conditions. Six Large White × Landrace boars were maintained in individual pens where they received their daily food allowance. Initially food was available ad libitum; subsequently boars were restricted proportionately to 0·8, 0·6 and 0·4 of their ad libitum intake in a Latin-square design. Finally boars were again offered their previously measured ad libitum intake (treatment 1·0). Hunger was measured by conditioning boars to press a panel 10 times to receive a 7-g reward of food. Operant response rates were measured over 20-min sessions during each of the treatments and at three times of day (pre-feeding, immediately post feeding and 5 h post feeding).Operant response rate was strongly affected by restricting food allowance (means: treatment 1·0, 42 panel presses; 0·8, 212; 0·6, 266; 0·4, 320). There was a signficant interaction between food allowance and time of day (P < 0·001). Treatments did not vary in response rate before feeding. Treatments 1·0 and 0·8 depressed response rate post feeding (P < 0·001) and treatment 1·0 also 5 h post feeding (P < 0·001). Response rates on treatments 0·6 and 0·4 did not vary significantly from one another or with time of day.Restricting pigs to low food levels resulted in a high level of hunger throughout the day. This was so even for food allowances that met current recommended feeding levels sufficient for maintenance and low weight gain (treatment 0·6 equivalent to 1·3 times maintenance). Commercial levels of feeding for the pig breeding population whilst meeting production needs do not satisfy feeding motivation. The hunger resulting from low food levels may act as a major source of stress under certain husbandry conditions such as tether and stall systems for dry sows, where sows are subject to both physical and food restriction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document