Supplemental Material for Parent Decision-Making About Support for Siblings of Children With Cancer: Sociodemographic Influences

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjali R. Oberoi ◽  
Nicole D. Cardona ◽  
Kathryn A. Davis ◽  
Emily M. Pariseau ◽  
Deborah Berk ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 351-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huriya Jabbar ◽  
Sarah Winchell Lenhoff

Author(s):  
Imelda Coyne ◽  
Dónal P O'Mathúna ◽  
Faith Gibson ◽  
Linda Shields ◽  
Edith Leclercq ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1357-1362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer W. Mack ◽  
E. Francis Cook ◽  
Joanne Wolfe ◽  
Holcombe E. Grier ◽  
Paul D. Cleary ◽  
...  

Purpose Patients often overestimate their chances of surviving cancer. Factors that contribute to accurate understanding of prognosis are not known. We assessed understanding of likelihood of cure and functional outcome among parents of children with cancer and sought to identify factors that place parents at risk for overly optimistic beliefs about prognosis. Patients and Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 194 parents of children with cancer (response rate, 70%) who were treated at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Children's Hospital in Boston, MA, and the children's physicians. Parent and physician expectations for likelihood of cure and functional outcome were compared. In 152 accurate or optimistic parents, we determined factors associated with accurate understanding of likelihood of cure compared with optimism. Results The majority of parents (61%) were more optimistic than physicians about the likelihood of cure. Parents' beliefs about other outcomes of cancer treatment were similar (quality-of-life impairment, P = .70) or more pessimistic (physical impairment, P = .01; intellectual impairment, P = .01) than physicians' beliefs. Parents and physicians were more likely to agree about chances of cure when physicians had confidence in knowledge of prognosis (odds ratio [OR] = 2.55, P = .004) and allowed parents to take their preferred decision-making role (OR = 1.89, P = .019). Conclusion Parents of children with cancer are overly optimistic about chances of cure but not about other outcomes of cancer therapy. Parents tend to be overly optimistic about cure when physicians have little confidence and when the decision-making process does not meet parents' preferences. These findings suggest that physicians are partly responsible for parents' unrealistic expectations about cure.


Prospects ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 411-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyadarshani Joshi

Ear & Hearing ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1684-1691
Author(s):  
Ginny L. Schulz ◽  
Susan Hayashi ◽  
Anne Spence ◽  
Judith Lieu ◽  
Allison King ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 352-360
Author(s):  
Amanda J. Lulloff ◽  
Judith A. Vessey ◽  
Lisa Bashore ◽  
Matt Gregas

Children with a cancer diagnosis have risk factors leading to unique nutritional challenges. Malnutrition in this population is correlated with worse patient outcomes. Nurses are responsible for providing holistic care to their patients; however, the quality of nutritional assessments by pediatric oncology nurses is unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate staff nurses’ clinical decision making regarding nutritional assessment of children with cancer. A web-based survey composed of a demographic form, vignettes of patients with diverse nutritional status and the New General Self-Efficacy Scale, was distributed to members of the Association of Pediatric Hematology Oncology Nurses. Participants were also asked to rate their confidence in responses as well as select key nutritional cues. Nurses were significantly more likely to under-rate the nutritional status and select far fewer cues than the experts. Further research regarding nutritional assessment is warranted. Evidenced-based guidelines for nutritional assessment of children with cancer should be developed to ensure the highest quality of care is provided to this patient population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document