AUDITORY VIGILANCE AS AFFECTED BY SIGNAL RATE AND INTERSIGNAL INTERVAL VARIABILITY.

1965 ◽  
Author(s):  
RICHARD L. MARTZ
Keyword(s):  
1970 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony G. Greenwald

Perception ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
P M McDonnell ◽  
Sandra Perusse

Two experiments employed dichotic listening and a visual analogue of dichotic listening. Detection of signals on a nonattended channel deteriorated for both modalities as the signal rate increased. However, deterioration in the primary task, vocal shadowing, was greater for auditory presentations. A third study showed that modality differences disappeared when shadowing difficulties were equated. In addition, it was argued from experiments 1 and 2 that increasing signal rate led to an increase in the selectivity of attention. At the point where shadowing began to deteriorate there was evidence of reciprocity or trading relations between primary and secondary tasks.


Author(s):  
Robert C. Williges

Forty-eight subjects detected a long-duration (1.7 or 1.3 sec.) change in brightness (from a 5 ft.-l. standard to a 4 ft.-l. level) of an electroluminescent panel during a 60-min. monitoring session. Signal/nonsignal ratios (1/9 or 1/1) and payoffs (lax, neutral, or strict) were combined factorially in a between-subject design. Signal ratios affected both the percent of signal detections and the percent of false-alarm errors. When subjects monitored under the lower signal ratios, a decrease in percent of signal detections occurred over time. Payoffs affected only the percent of false alarms in the higher signal rate conditions. Signal detection theory analyses resulted in a slight decrease in d' and a marked increase in β during the watch period. The change in β was due primarily to the lower signal ratio conditions. Payoffs had no effect on subsequent β change. It was concluded that signal ratios rather than payoffs play the major role in determining decision performance in simple visual monitoring tasks.


2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (36) ◽  
pp. 3027-3031
Author(s):  
JIAN WANG ◽  
GUOMING CHEN ◽  
WEIMIN WU

Most of current Monte Carlo studies on the Higgs searching are based on LO, or NLO calculation. However, in recent years, the next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) corrections have been computed for some physics process, and found that the cross section increases the kinematics changes. As the results, the analysis results could be impacted by these high order QCD corrections. We use standard Monte Carlo generator for LO, as well as MC@NLO for NLO and ResBos for NNLO at 7 TeV of LHC to evaluate this impact for physics channel of the Higgs, mass at 165 GeV, to WW, then W decay to lepton and neutrino as the final states. We found the signal rate could be effected by ratio of 1:2.6:3.4 for LO, NLO and NNLO using the same standard H→WW→lνlν searching analysis process.6


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan J. Hostetter ◽  
J. Andrew Royle

AbstractBackgroundAcoustic telemetry technologies are being rapidly deployed to study a variety of aquatic taxa including fishes, reptiles, and marine mammals. Large cooperative telemetry networks produce vast quantities of data useful in the study of movement, resource selection and species distribution. Efficient use of acoustic telemetry data requires estimation of acoustic source locations from detections at sensors (i.e. localization). Multiple processes provide information for localization estimation including detection/non-detection data at sensors, information on signal rate, and an underlying movement model describing how individuals move and utilize space. Frequently, however, localization methods only integrate a subset of these processes and do not utilize the full spatial encounter history information available from sensor arrays.MethodsIn this paper we draw analogies between the challenges of acoustic telemetry localization and newly developed methods of spatial capture-recapture (SCR). We develop a framework for localization that integrates explicit sub-models for movement, signal (or cue) rate, and detection probability, based on acoustic telemetry spatial encounter history data. This method, which we call movement-assisted localization, makes efficient use of the full encounter history data available from acoustic sensor arrays, provides localizations with fewer than three detections, and even allows for predictions to be made of the position of an individual when it was not detected at all. We demonstrate these concepts by developing generalizable Bayesian formulations of the SCR movement-assisted localization model to address study-specific challenges common in acoustic telemetry studies.ResultsSimulation studies show that movement-assisted localization models improve point-wise RMSE of localization estimates by > 50% and greatly increased the precision of estimated trajectories compared to localization using only the detection history of a given signal. Additionally, integrating a signal rate sub-model reduced biases in the estimation of movement, signal rate, and detection parameters observed in independent localization models.ConclusionsMovement-assisted localization provides a flexible framework to maximize the use of acoustic telemetry data. Conceptualizing localization within an SCR framework allows extensions to a variety of data collection protocols, improves the efficiency of studies interested in movement, resource selection, and space-use, and provides a unifying framework for modeling acoustic data.


2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Bechtle ◽  
Sven Heinemeyer ◽  
Tobias Klingl ◽  
Tim Stefaniak ◽  
Georg Weiglein ◽  
...  

AbstractThe program confronts the predictions of models with arbitrary Higgs sectors with the available Higgs signal rate and mass measurements, resulting in a likelihood estimate. A new version of the program, , is presented that contains various improvements in its functionality and applicability. In particular, the new features comprise improvements in the theoretical input framework and the handling of possible complexities of beyond-the-SM Higgs sectors, as well as the incorporation of experimental results in the form of simplified template cross section (STXS) measurements. The new functionalities are explained, and a thorough discussion of the possible statistical interpretations of the results is provided. The performance of is illustrated for some example analyses. In this context the importance of public information on certain experimental details like efficiencies and uncertainty correlations is pointed out. is continuously updated to the latest experimental results and can be obtained at https://gitlab.com/higgsbounds/higgssignals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document