Publish or Perish: Tips on Surviving the Journal Review Process

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
George V. Gushue ◽  
Lisa Y. Flores
Keyword(s):  
Review Process ◽  
Journal Review ◽  
Publish Or Perish

25 Reflections on Accounting Research

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana R. Hermanson
Keyword(s):  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Journal Review ◽  
Accounting Research

ABSTRACT In this essay, I reflect on my roughly 25 years in accounting research by discussing 25 topics related to (1) the journal review process, (2) specific types of accounting research, and (3) the research process. I hope that these observations will prompt additional thought and discussion, help accounting doctoral students and faculty to publish their research, and potentially challenge some readers.

scholarly journals Publish-and-Flourish: Using Blockchain Platform to Enable Cooperative Scholarly Communication

Publications ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Emilija Stojmenova Duh ◽  
Andrej Duh ◽  
Uroš Droftina ◽  
Tim Kos ◽  
Urban Duh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
User Behavior ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Cooperative Behavior ◽  
Scholarly Communication ◽  
Research Paper ◽  
Strategic Games ◽  
Publish Or Perish ◽  
Smart Contract

Scholarly communication is today immersed in publish-or-perish culture that propels non-cooperative behavior in the sense of strategic games played by researchers. Here we introduce and describe a blockchain based platform for decentralized scholarly communication. The design of the platform rests on community driven publishing reviewing processes and implements cryptoeconomic incentives that promote cooperative user behavior. The key to achieve cooperation in blockchain based scholarly communication is to transform today’s static research paper into a modifiable research paper under continuous peer review process. We introduce and discuss the implementation of a modifiable research paper as a smart contract on the blockchain.

Testing Analytical Models Using Archival or Experimental Methods

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane S. Dikolli ◽  
John H. Evans ◽  
Jeffrey Hales ◽  
Michal Matejka ◽  
Donald V. Moser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Empirical Research ◽  
Analytical Model ◽  
Empirical Data ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Experimental Methods ◽  
Analytical Models ◽  
Journal Review ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Jel Classifications

SYNOPSIS Analytical models can quite naturally complement empirical data, whether archival or experimental. This article begins by discussing the advantages and disadvantages of combining an analytical model with archival or experimental data in a single study. We next describe how models are typically used in empirical research and discuss when including an analytical model is more versus less useful. Finally, we offer examples of more and less successful combinations of analytical models and empirical data, along with a brief discussion of how such studies are likely to fare in the journal review process. JEL Classifications: C02; C51; C99.

A perspective on the journal review process.

1996 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. 1190-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth A. Rabinovich
Keyword(s):  
Review Process ◽  
Journal Review

REVIEWER AND EDITOR DECISION MAKING IN THE JOURNAL REVIEW PROCESS

1997 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 427-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEPHEN W. GILLILAND ◽  
JOSÉ M. CORTINA
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Journal Review
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document