Eye movement and reaction time are both important in assessment of dialog box usability

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce N. Walker ◽  
Raymond M. Stanley
Keyword(s):  
Data in Brief ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 105108
Author(s):  
Felix-Sebastian Koch ◽  
Anett Sundqvist ◽  
Ulrika Birberg Thornberg ◽  
Michael T. Ullman ◽  
Rachel Barr ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen He ◽  
Yazheng Ji ◽  
Xiating Wei ◽  
Fan Wang ◽  
Feng Xu ◽  
...  

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of eye movement technique for the treatment of executive dysfunction of patients with stroke.Methods: This was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial conducted from June 2018 to December 2019 in patients with stroke. The patients were randomized 1:1 to the routine (conventional management) and eye-move group (routine management plus eye movement technique: 5-min goal management training, 5-min computer-aided working memory, and 10 min of inhibitory control training and set conversion training). The intervention lasted 6 weeks, followed by a 4-week follow-up. The primary endpoint was the Behavioral Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS) score. The secondary endpoints mainly included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), and modified Barthel Index (MBI) scores.Results: Sixty-four patients were enrolled (32/group). After the 6-week intervention, the BADS and WCST scores of the eye-move group were significantly improved than those of the routine group (all P < 0.05), but the effects were attenuated in certain subscores after follow-up (all P > 0.05). The MoCA and MBI scores of the eye-move group were significantly higher, and the reaction time was significantly lower than those of the routine group at 4 weeks after the intervention (all P < 0.05). After follow-up, the MBI scores of the eye-move group were still higher than that of the routine group (P < 0.001), but there were no differences for MoCA scores and reaction time (both P > 0.05).Conclusion: The eye movement technique could improve the executive function of patients with stroke. These results have to be confirmed.This was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial (ChiCTR2000036393).Clinical Trial Registration: [www.chictr.org.cn], identifier [ChiCTR2000036393].


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepmala Mazumdar ◽  
Najiya S. Kadavath Meethal ◽  
Manish Panday ◽  
Rashima Asokan ◽  
Gijs Thepass ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronnie George ◽  
Jvan der Steen ◽  
Deepmala Mazumdar ◽  
JJM Pel ◽  
Manish Panday ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 3055-3073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joonyeol Lee ◽  
Timothy R Darlington ◽  
Stephen G Lisberger

Abstract We seek a neural circuit explanation for sensory-motor reaction times. In the smooth eye movement region of the frontal eye fields (FEFSEM), the latencies of pairs of neurons show trial-by-trial correlations that cause trial-by-trial correlations in neural and behavioral latency. These correlations can account for two-third of the observed variation in behavioral latency. The amplitude of preparatory activity also could contribute, but the responses of many FEFSEM neurons fail to support predictions of the traditional “ramp-to-threshold” model. As a correlate of neural processing that determines reaction time, the local field potential in FEFSEM includes a brief wave in the 5–15-Hz frequency range that precedes pursuit initiation and whose phase is correlated with the latency of pursuit in individual trials. We suggest that the latency of the incoming visual motion signals combines with the state of preparatory activity to determine the latency of the transient response that controls eye movement. Impact statement The motor cortex for smooth pursuit eye movements contributes to sensory-motor reaction time through the amplitude of preparatory activity and the latency of transient, visually driven responses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document