Metacognitive theory applied: Strategic reading instruction in the current generation of basal readers

1993 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 13-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maribeth Cassidy Schmitt ◽  
Carol J. Hopkins
2004 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Caverly ◽  
Sheila A. Nicholson ◽  
Richard Radcliffe

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (48) ◽  
pp. 283-300
Author(s):  
Jagoda Topalov ◽  

The aim of this paper is to determine the effects of Collaborative strategic reading (CSR), an instructional framework designed to improve students’ reading skills (Klingner, Vaughn 1999), on EFL learners’ inventory of reading strategies and the frequency of its use. In a quasi-experimental pre-test – post-test study with a control group, the participants were, over two semesters, exposed to strategic reading instruction in either a cooperative or an individual setting. A series of mixed between-within repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted in order to see whether there were differences in the use of reading strategies between the students from the two groups, as well as between the same students tested at three different times (at baseline, at the middle of the experiment, and upon the completion of the experiment). The results indicate that the cooperative setting has a statistical effect on the use of strategies employed during and after reading academic texts, but not before. The results further show that the students from the experimental group reported significantly more self-regulatory behaviors than the students from the control group upon the completion of the experiment, but not at its middle, suggesting that prolonged exposure to experimental input is necessary for the effects of group-work dynamics to become visible and the strategic framework to become internalized. Pedagogical implications of the results mainly address the potential of group-work dynamics in offering an effective alternative to typical teacher-centered EFL instruction found in most university contexts.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Indah Welasasih Ludji

Explicit instruction of reading strategies has often been recommended to develop L2 or EFL learners with poor reading performance. This paper aims to examine how effective the approach is when it is combined with a diagnostic assessment tool, both on participants’ reading performance at literal and inferential levels, and participants’ attitudes towards reading. The experimental study involved two groups of 9 grade students in West Manggarai, East Nusa Tenggara who were identified as low-level readers. The findings reveal that while both control and experimental groups made significant progress in their reading performance, the experimental group yielded larger effect size than the control group. It is concluded that the use of diagnostic assessment tool was proven to be instrumental in extending the participants’ reading performance. Classroom implications and suggestions for future research are provided based on the aforementioned findings.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mienke Droop ◽  
Willy van Elsäcker ◽  
Marinus J. M. Voeten ◽  
Ludo Verhoeven

Author(s):  
Mahmood Kazemi ◽  
Mohsen Hosseini ◽  
Mohammadreza Kohandani

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-27
Author(s):  
Siti Tamah

One of the language skills to master by Indonesian EFL learners is reading. In order to assist learners comprehend reading texts, teachers are challenged to apply various teaching strategies. As this paper focuses on teaching reading, two teaching strategies dealing with reading instruction are compared. To be specific, in this paper the writers conduct a study to find the difference between Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) and teacher-centered teaching strategy (by applying skimming and scanning). This study was a quasi experimental, which was conducted upon the sixth graders of an elementary school. The finding showed that reading achievements of the students who are taught using CSR and teacher-centered teaching strategy are not significantly different. Nevertheless, this study using Cohen’s d formula finds that CSR gave a small effect on students’ reading achievement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document