Achievement motivation in college women: A now-you-see-it-now-you-don't phenomenon.

1974 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thelma G. Alper
1985 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 267-271
Author(s):  
Mostafa A. Torki

The present study was designed to explore the achievement motivation and fear of success in the Arab culture. Research was carried out in Kuwait, Lebanon, Quatar and Iraq on achievement motivation of men and women. The relationship between femininity and fear of success was studied. There were no differences in achievement motivation of Arab men and women in Kuwait, Lebanon, Quatar, and Iraq. There was no correlation between femininity and fear of success. The Kuwaiti women showed less fear of success than American women. Factors in the Arab culture which affect achievement motivation were discussed.


2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (14) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
MICHELE G. SULLIVAN
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 318-327
Author(s):  
Philipp Alexander Freund ◽  
Vanessa Katharina Jaensch ◽  
Franzis Preckel

Abstract. The current study investigates the behavior of task-specific, current achievement motivation (CAM: interest in the task, probability of success, perceived challenge, and fear of failure) across a variety of reasoning tasks featuring verbal, numerical, and figural content. CAM is conceptualized as a state-like variable, and in order to assess the relative stability of the four CAM variables across different tasks, latent state trait analyses are conducted. The major findings indicate that the degree of challenge a test taker experiences and the fear of failing a given task appear to be relatively stable regardless of the specific task utilized, whereas interest and probability of success are more directly influenced by task-specific characteristics and demands. Furthermore, task performance is related to task-specific interest and probability of success. We discuss the implications and benefits of these results with regard to the use of cognitive ability tests in general. Importantly, taking motivational differences between test takers into account appears to offer valuable information which helps to explain differences in task performance.


1981 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 787-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin L. Maehr ◽  
Douglas A. Kleiber

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document