Psychology in National Socialism [Psychologie im Nationalsozialismus] at Sigmund Freud Private University Berlin, July 27–28, 2018.

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-109
Author(s):  
Martin Wieser
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 102-119
Author(s):  
Anna Shor-Chudnovskaya

Anna Shor-Chudnovskaya – PhD in Sociology, Researcher, Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, (Austria). Address: Freudplatz 1, 1020 Wien, Austria. E-mail: [email protected] Citation: Shor-Chudnovskaya A. (2018) Young Russians’ View of Their Family’s Soviet Past: Nostalgic, Post-Utopian or Retrotopian? Mir Rossii, vol. 27, no 4, pp. 102–119. DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2018-27-4-102-119 This article presents analysis of interviews with young Russians about the lives of different generations of their families in the Soviet Union. The analysis shows that the ideas about the life in the USSR and about family pasts are very fragmented and scarce, and it does not seem to the young people that this past affects their lives today. Nor does the question of the connection between the past and present seem interesting or relevant to them. The narratives about life in the USSR often idealize the circumstances and conditions of this life, but the young people do not express any nostalgic attitudes towards the Soviet past. One of the main findings of the analysis was the extreme inconsistency in the descriptions of life in the USSR, judgments about it and in stories about the attitudes of older relatives. Such contradictions do not seem to be a distinctive feature of the younger generation, but rather continue a Soviet tradition. Overall, young people’s attitude to the Soviet past is determined by at least three factors: the political situation in present-day Russia, the post-utopian heritage of the USSR and pan-European retrotopian tendencies.


Crisis ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoon A. Leenaars

Summary: Older adults consistently have the highest rates of suicide in most societies. Despite the paucity of studies until recently, research has shown that suicides in later life are best understood as a multidimensional event. An especially neglected area of research is the psychological/psychiatric study of personality factors in the event. This paper outlines one comprehensive model of suicide and then raises the question: Is such a psychiatric/psychological theory applicable to all suicides in the elderly? To address the question, I discuss the case of Sigmund Freud; raise the topic of suicide and/or dignified death in the terminally ill; and examine suicide notes of the both terminally ill and nonterminally ill elderly. I conclude that, indeed, greater study and theory building are needed into the “suicides” of the elderly, including those who are terminally ill.


1979 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 537-537
Author(s):  
No authorship indicated
Keyword(s):  

1986 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. 1007-1007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul L. Wachtel
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary N. Howells ◽  
Iva Lewis ◽  
Wendy Ratto
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 09 (04) ◽  
pp. 226-230
Author(s):  
U. H. Peters
Keyword(s):  

ZusammenfassungViele Historiker meinen, die Psychotherapie sei von Sigmund Freud erfunden worden, wieder andere glauben, die Psychotherapie habe um 1800 begonnen. Das eine ist so wenig zutreffend wie das andere. Die Psychotherapie ist ab 1700 unmittelbar mit dem Beginn der Aufklärung in Deutschland entstanden, als Georg Ernst Stahl 1695 als erster eine Theorie darüber veröffentliche, wie Körper und Psyche aufeinander wirken. Die Psychotherapie besteht nun bereits in ihrem 4. Jahrhundert und findet in Deutschland allgemeine Anerkennung. Im Folgenden soll nun ihr erstes Jahrhundert näher beleuchtet werden. Es ist die Phase der Entstehung der Psychotherapie bis hin zur Prägung ihres Namens zu Beginn 1800. Ihre Entwicklung, ihre Lehre und ihre Techniken und Anwendung werden hier im Einzelnen dargestellt.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document