Session Evaluation Questionnaire

1980 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Stiles
2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-76
Author(s):  
Taisuke Katsuragawa ◽  
Yoshihiko Kunisato ◽  
Jun Kanno ◽  
Kazuyoshi Sasaki

Author(s):  
Diego Rocco ◽  
Silvia Salcuni ◽  
Elena Antonelli

The Session Evaluation Questionnaire (SEQ) measures the impact of counselling and psychotherapy sessions; it may be conceived as a bridge between psychotherapy process and outcome. Even if the original American SEQ has been translated into many languages, only a few translations have been validated. This is a pilot study that attempted to replicate the five-dimensional structure of the fourth version of the Anglo-American SEQ, for the Italian population. The SEQ is a self-report tool asking patients about their experience with the clinical session just ended; it consists of 27 adjectives in semantic differential scale, divided into three thematic parts: evaluation of the session itself, feelings after the session, and evaluation of the therapist. Data were collected on 111 outpatients attending the Dynamic Psychological Service for University Students, after their first two clinical interviews. Exploratory factor analyses were performed on each of the three parts of the SEQ. Results confirmed the original factorial structure, for Depth, Smoothness, Positivity and Arousal dimensions; Good Therapist dimension overlapped perfectly with the original one. The Italian SEQ showed adequate internal consistency. Convergent validity measured with an index of perceived satisfaction in the counselling process showed significant positive correlations. This pilot study showed that the Italian SEQ is a reliable instrument to measure the impact of clinical sessions. Validation studies are needed, especially to replicate the factor structure of the instrument and to better assess its validity.


1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Stiles ◽  
Larry A. Tupler ◽  
James C. Carpenter

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Rocco ◽  
Silvia Salcuni ◽  
Elena Antonelli

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne C. Watson ◽  
Leslie S. Greenberg

1994 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Stiles ◽  
Shirley Reynolds ◽  
Gillian E. Hardy ◽  
Anne Rees ◽  
Michael Barkham ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 79 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1207-1215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rob Millar ◽  
Chris Brotherton

A preliminary investigation was made of a measure to evaluate the effects of career interviews on young people. Using the Session Evaluation Questionnaire as a model, a set of bipolar adjective scales presented in semantic differential format were tested on 58 15- and 16-yr.-olds who were low achieving students in their final year of statutory education. Results supported earlier findings where two postinterview evaluation factors, termed depth and smoothness, and two postinterview affective state factors, termed positivity and arousal, were identified. In general, the reliabilities of some measures are adequate although further development is required.


Diagnostica ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armin Hartmann ◽  
Rainer Leonhart ◽  
Sabine Hermann ◽  
Andreas Joos ◽  
William B. Stiles ◽  
...  

Das Session Evaluation Questionnaire (SEQ) wurde ins Deutsche übersetzt. Es erfasst die unmittelbaren Auswirkungen einer Therapiesitzung in je eigener Version für Patienten und Therapeuten. Primäres Ziel der Untersuchung war die Replikation der Faktorstruktur, sekundäres Ziel die Bestimmung der Übereinstimmung der Patienten- und Therapeutensicht. Die Stichprobe umfasst 1164 Therapiesitzungen aus 98 Therapien (26 Therapeuten) zu denen aus Patienten- und Therapeutensicht das SEQ erhoben wurde. Für beide Perspektiven wurde mittels Konfirmatorischer Mehrebenen Faktoranalyse die Anpassungsgüte der amerikanischen Faktorlösung überprüft. Die Faktoren Tiefe, Fluss & Positivität des SEQ lassen sich in der deutschen Version replizieren. Der vierte Faktor „Aufregung” erweist sich für die deutsche Version des SEQ als nicht reliabel. Patienten- und Therapeutensicht einer Stunde sind wenig konvergent. Der SEQ-D steht als deutschsprachiges, international vergleichbares und therapie-schulenübergreifendes Instrument für Psychotherapieprozessforschungsfragen zur Verfügung.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document