scholarly journals A pilot study of the Italian adaptation of the Session Evaluation Questionnaire fourth version

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Rocco ◽  
Silvia Salcuni ◽  
Elena Antonelli
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Dimensional Structure ◽  
Italian Population ◽  
Evaluation Questionnaire ◽  
Perceived Satisfaction ◽  
Clinical Session ◽  
Session Evaluation ◽  
The Impact

The Session Evaluation Questionnaire (SEQ) measures the impact of counselling and psychotherapy sessions; it may be conceived as a bridge between psychotherapy process and outcome. Even if the original American SEQ has been translated into many languages, only a few translations have been validated. This is a pilot study that attempted to replicate the five-dimensional structure of the fourth version of the Anglo-American SEQ, for the Italian population. The SEQ is a self-report tool asking patients about their experience with the clinical session just ended; it consists of 27 adjectives in semantic differential scale, divided into three thematic parts: evaluation of the session itself, feelings after the session, and evaluation of the therapist. Data were collected on 111 outpatients attending the Dynamic Psychological Service for University Students, after their first two clinical interviews. Exploratory factor analyses were performed on each of the three parts of the SEQ. Results confirmed the original factorial structure, for Depth, Smoothness, Positivity and Arousal dimensions; Good Therapist dimension overlapped perfectly with the original one. The Italian SEQ showed adequate internal consistency. Convergent validity measured with an index of perceived satisfaction in the counselling process showed significant positive correlations. This pilot study showed that the Italian SEQ is a reliable instrument to measure the impact of clinical sessions. Validation studies are needed, especially to replicate the factor structure of the instrument and to better assess its validity.

scholarly journals Development and Validation of a Questionnaire Evaluating the Impact of Prosthetic Dental Treatments on Patients’ Oral Health Quality of Life: A Prospective Pilot Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (14) ◽  
pp. 5037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eitan Mijiritsky ◽  
Yael Lerman ◽  
Ori Mijiritsky ◽  
Asaf Shely ◽  
Joseph Meyerson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Measurement Tool ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Prospective Pilot Study ◽  
The Impact

Objectives: the aims of this study were the development of a novel questionnaire to assess the impact of prosthetic treatments on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and the performance of a prospective pilot study. Background: the currently preferred OHRQoL measurement tool is the oral health impact profile-49 (OHIP-49), a self-report questionnaire which mainly focuses on general effects related to oral health. Materials and methods: A total of 24 adult participants (9 females and 15 males) were recruited and asked to complete the novel questionnaire twice: once before the prosthetic treatment began and 4–6 weeks post-treatment. The assessment of the change in OHRQoL was based on the differences in participants’ answers before and after treatment. Data were analyzed using ANOVA with a repeated-measures method and t-tests. The reliability of the questionnaire was tested using Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass coefficient (ICC). Results: The questionnaire was found to be reliable (α ≥ 0.6), with “social disability” having the highest score (α = 0.868). All domains showed an improvement (α < 0.005) in OHRQoL scores after treatment. Conclusions: the novel questionnaire tested in this study was found to be reliable and convenient to use, and demonstrated that prosthetic treatments have a significant positive effect on OHRQoL post-treatment scores.

scholarly journals Development and Validation of Nasal Polyposis Quality of Life Questionnaire (NPQ)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilaria Baiardini ◽  
Giovanni Paoletti ◽  
Alessia Mariani ◽  
Luca Malvezzi ◽  
Francesca Pirola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Nasal Polyposis ◽  
Minimal Important Difference ◽  
Dimensional Structure ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Quality Of Life Questionnaire ◽  
Development And Validation ◽  
The Impact

Abstract BACKGROUND: To date, no disease-specific tool is available to assess the impact of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) on Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop and validate a questionnaire specifically designed to this aim: the Nasal Polyposis Quality of Life questionnaire –NPQ.METHODS: According to the current guidelines, the development and validation of the NPQ occurred in two separate steps involving different groups of patients.RESULTS: In the development process of NPQ an initial list of items of 40 items was given to 60 patients with CRSwNP; the 27 most significant items were selected and converted into questions. The validation procedure involved 107 patients (mean age 52.9±12.4). NPQ revealed a five-dimensional structure and high levels of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.95). Convergent validity (Spearman’ coefficient r=0.75; p< 0.01), discriminant validity (sensitivity to VAS score), reliability in a sample of patients with a stable health status (Interclass Coefficient 0.882) were satisfactory. Responsiveness to clinical changes was accomplished. The minimal important difference was 7. CONCLUSIONS: NPQ is the first questionnaire for the assessment of HRQoL in CRSwNP. Our results provide that the new tool is valid, reliable, and sensitive to individual changes.

scholarly journals WHAT IS AGEISM?: A REVIEW AND ANALYTICAL CRITIQUE OF CURRENT MEASURES OF AGEISM

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S915-S915
Author(s):  
Jerin Lee ◽  
Jenna Wilson ◽  
Natalie Shook
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Empirical Work ◽  
Census Bureau ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Analytical Review ◽  
Prejudicial Attitudes ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Practical Implications

Abstract The past two decades have been marked by a rapidly aging population in the U.S. (U.S. Census Bureau, 2018), making prejudicial attitudes toward older adults (i.e., ageism) and the impact of such attitudes more relevant. Understanding ageism is necessary to change institutionalized beliefs and reduce prejudice toward older adults. However, it requires the availability of valid and reliable measures of ageism. The purpose of the present research was to: (1) provide an analytical review of three existing self-report measures of ageism (i.e., Fabroni Scale of Ageism [FSA]; Relating to Older People Evaluation [ROPE]; Ambivalent Ageism Scale [AAS]); and (2) examine the reliability and convergent validity of these ageism measures. A total of 473 undergraduate students completed the FSA, ROPE, and AAS online. The results indicated that the FSA, subscales of the ROPE (i.e., positive and negative ageism), and subscales of the AAS (i.e., benevolent and hostile ageism) were generally positively associated with one another, with two exceptions. First, positive ageism was negatively correlated with the FSA. Second, positive ageism was not significantly correlated with hostile ageism. Importantly, there was notable variability in the magnitude of the correlations between the measures, as correlations were mostly weak to moderate in magnitude (rs ranged from -.13 to .65). These associations are below the recommended threshold of r = ±.70 for convergent validity (Carlson & Herdman, 2012), suggesting conceptual problems with current ageism measures as they do not appear to reflect a common construct, which has practical implications for future theoretical and empirical work.

scholarly journals Development and validation of the General Attitude towards Medication Questionnaire (GAMQ) - Preprint

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Tekampe ◽  
Kaya Peerdeman ◽  
Henriët van Middendorp ◽  
Antoinette I.M. van Laarhoven ◽  
Ralph C.A. Rippe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Negative Attitudes ◽  
General Attitude ◽  
Negative Beliefs ◽  
Positive Attitudes ◽  
Specific Medication ◽  
Nocebo Effects ◽  
The Impact

Background: Attitudes towards medication can affect treatment outcomes and adherence through mechanisms such as placebo and nocebo effects. Although both negative and positive attitudes towards medication are of importance, previous research mainly investigated the impact of negative attitudes towards medication. This focus is also reflected in existing self-report scales, most of which measure negative beliefs about medication in general and/or focus on specific medication. To assess both negative and positive attitudes towards medication in general, the General Attitude towards Medication Questionnaire (GAMQ) was developed.Method: For the GAMQ, 12 items largely based on existing questionnaires were selected. It was validated in 4 Dutch samples: 2 samples of 508 and 279 respondents of the general population, and 2 samples of 121 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and 70 patients with atopic dermatitis.Results: Factor analyses indicated three subscales representing “Trust in medication”, “Concerns about medication”, and “Reluctance to use medication”, which were structurally stable across the samples. The total scale showed good internal consistency. Medium to strong correlations with other measures of general medication attitude (e.g. BMQ-G), indicated good convergent validity. Furthermore, exploring its predictive validity indicated that the GAMQ correlated with expected medication outcomes.Conclusion: Results suggest that the GAMQ is suitable for assessing general medication attitudes, both negative and positive, in a wide variety of research settings and in various patient populations. Due to its balanced nature, the GAMQ may be especially informative when investigating predictors of treatment outcomes and adherence, as well as determinants of placebo and nocebo effects.

A Pilot Study of the Impact of Music on Self-Report Ratings of Pain, Anxiety, Stress, Relaxation, Mood, and Exertion During Physical or Occupational Therapy Sessions

PM&R ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. S158-S158
Author(s):  
Henry K. Lee ◽  
Usman F. Ahmad ◽  
Kevin Dalal ◽  
Vladimir Romannikov ◽  
Elizabeth R. Felix
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Stress Relaxation ◽  
Occupational Therapy ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Pain Anxiety ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Therapy Sessions

scholarly journals Mentalized affectivity in a nutshell: Validation of the Italian version of the Brief-Mentalized Affectivity Scale (B-MAS)

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. e0260678
Author(s):  
Marianna Liotti ◽  
Grazia Fernanda Spitoni ◽  
Vittorio Lingiardi ◽  
Antonella Marchetti ◽  
Anna Maria Speranza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Normative Data ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Reflective Functioning ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Italian Population ◽  
Snowball Sampling ◽  
Italian Version ◽  
Empirical Foundation

The term “mentalized affectivity” describes the ability to reflect on, process, modulate and express emotions through the prism of autobiographical memory. It represents a bridge concept that integrates previous contributions on emotion regulation and mentalization, offering a quite unique perspective on affective and reflective functioning. The overall aim of this study was to validate the Brief-Mentalized Affectivity Scale (B-MAS), a 12-items self-report instrument, on the Italian population. We tested both the factorial validity of the instrument and its reliability and convergent validity with other similar constructs. We also obtained normative data for the Italian population, broken down by gender. Participants (n = 389) were recruited through snowball sampling. Data was collected through an online survey. Besides the Brief-Mentalized Affectivity Scale, the survey included an ad hoc schedule with questions investigating socio-demographic characteristics, and self-report measures of empathy and reflective functioning. Statistical analysis has shown a three-component (Identifying, Processing, and Expressing emotions) hierarchical structure underlying mentalized affectivity, mirroring the model already proposed in the original validation of the instrument. Moreover, the B-MAS showed good psychometric properties for what regards both reliability and convergent validity. The results of our study highlight the good operationalization and robust empirical foundation of the construct, revealing that the B-MAS is a promising instrument to assess mentalized affectivity. Its brevity makes it particularly valuable both in clinical and research contexts, and the normative data provided in this study will allow an easy comparison with the scores obtained by other samples (clinical and non-clinical).

The Stereotype Threat Effect

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 249-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Moritz ◽  
Insa Happach ◽  
Karla Spirandelli ◽  
Tania M. Lincoln ◽  
Fabrice Berna
Keyword(s):  
Stereotype Threat ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Neuropsychological Performance ◽  
Neurocognitive Deficits ◽  
Online Study ◽  
Memory And Attention ◽  
Threat Effect ◽  
Efficacy Expectations ◽  
Study Participants ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Neurocognitive deficits in patients with mental disorders are partially due to secondary influences. “Stereotype threat” denotes the phenomenon that performance is compromised when a participant is confronted with a devaluing stereotype. The present study examined the impact of stereotype threat on neuropsychological performance in schizophrenia. Seventy-seven participants with a self-reported diagnosis of schizophrenia were randomly assigned to either an experimental condition involving stereotype threat activation or a control condition in an online study. Participants completed memory and attention tests as well as questionnaires on motivation, self-efficacy expectations, cognitive complaints, and self-stigmatization. Contrary to our prediction, the two groups showed no significant differences regarding neuropsychological performance and self-report measures. Limitations, such as a possibly too weak threat cue, are discussed and recommendations for future studies are outlined.

Research Participation Experiences of Informants of Suicide and Control Cases

Crisis ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 238-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul W. C. Wong ◽  
Wincy S. C. Chan ◽  
Philip S. L. Beh ◽  
Fiona W. S. Yau ◽  
Paul S. F. Yip ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Research Participation ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Initial Contact ◽  
Psychological Autopsy ◽  
Autopsy Study ◽  
The People ◽  
And Control ◽  
The Impact

Background: Ethical issues have been raised about using the psychological autopsy approach in the study of suicide. The impact on informants of control cases who participated in case-control psychological autopsy studies has not been investigated. Aims: (1) To investigate whether informants of suicide cases recruited by two approaches (coroners’ court and public mortuaries) respond differently to the initial contact by the research team. (2) To explore the reactions, reasons for participation, and comments of both the informants of suicide and control cases to psychological autopsy interviews. (3) To investigate the impact of the interviews on informants of suicide cases about a month after the interviews. Methods: A self-report questionnaire was used for the informants of both suicide and control cases. Telephone follow-up interviews were conducted with the informants of suicide cases. Results: The majority of the informants of suicide cases, regardless of the initial route of contact, as well as the control cases were positive about being approached to take part in the study. A minority of informants of suicide and control cases found the experience of talking about their family member to be more upsetting than expected. The telephone follow-up interviews showed that none of the informants of suicide cases reported being distressed by the psychological autopsy interviews. Limitations: The acceptance rate for our original psychological autopsy study was modest. Conclusions: The findings of this study are useful for future participants and researchers in measuring the potential benefits and risks of participating in similar sensitive research. Psychological autopsy interviews may be utilized as an active engagement approach to reach out to the people bereaved by suicide, especially in places where the postvention work is underdeveloped.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document