Mental Health Literacy Questionnaire for Anxiety Disorders

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith E. Coles ◽  
Shannon L. Coleman
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luísa Campos ◽  
Pedro Dias ◽  
Filipa Palha ◽  
Ana Duarte ◽  
Elisa Veiga

2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 947-956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola J. Reavley ◽  
Anthony F. Jorm

Objective: The aim of the study was to carry out a national survey in order to assess recognition and beliefs about treatment for affective disorders, anxiety disorders and schizophrenia/psychosis. Method: In 2011, telephone interviews were carried out with 6019 Australians aged 15 or over. Participants were presented with a case vignette describing either depression, depression with suicidal thoughts, early schizophrenia, chronic schizophrenia, social phobia or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Questions were asked about what was wrong with the person, the likely helpfulness of a broad range of interventions and the likely outcomes for the person with and without appropriate treatment. Results: Rates of recognition of depression were relatively high, with almost 75% of respondents using the correct label. Rates of recognition for the schizophrenia vignettes and PTSD were similar, with around one third of respondents using the correct labels. Only 9.2% of respondents were able to correctly label social phobia. Respondents gave the highest helpfulness ratings to GPs, counsellors, antidepressants, antipsychotics (for schizophrenia) and lifestyle interventions such as physical activity, relaxation and getting out more. Respondents were generally optimistic about recovery following treatment, although relapse was seen as likely. Conclusions: While Australians' beliefs about effective medications and interventions for mental disorders have moved closer to those of health professionals since surveys conducted in 1995 and 2003/4, there is still potential for mental health literacy gains in the areas of recognition and treatment beliefs for mental disorders. This is particularly the case for schizophrenia and anxiety disorders, which are less well recognized and, in the case of social phobia, generally perceived as having less need for professional help.


Health ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. 521-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Furnham ◽  
Chiara Lousley

2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
V Posai ◽  
◽  
R Boonchoo ◽  
D Watradul ◽  
K Makkabphalanon ◽  
...  

Objectives To study the level of mental health literacy and quality of life among patients with stroke and to investigate the relationship between mental health literacy and quality of life. Methods A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted with 150 purposively selected stroke patients at Sanpasithiprasong Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand. Data were collected from October 2019 to March 2020. The research tool consisted of 3 parts: general and clinical data, a mental health literacy questionnaire, and the Thai version of the stroke-specific quality of life scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Results The mean age of participants was 51.80 years (SD 8.62); most were female (65.33%). The level of mental health literacy among patients with stroke was moderate (mean = 3.05, SD = 0.21). The quality of life among patients with stroke was moderate (mean = 3.06, SD = 0.66). The mental health literacy questionnaire yielded a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.92, and the Thai version of the stroke-specific quality of life scale yielded a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.96. Mental health literacy was statistically significantly associated with quality of life among patients with stroke (r = 0.484, p < .001). Conclusions The mental health literacy among patients with stroke was moderate as was their quality of life. Mental health literacy was significantly associated with quality of life among patients with stroke. This suggests that emphasizing and promoting mental health literacy among patients with stroke can improve and increase their quality of life. Chiang Mai Medical Journal 2021;60(1):63-74. doi 10.12982/CMUMEDJ.2021.06


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document