Short-Form Service Leadership Behavior Scale--38

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel T. L. Shek ◽  
Diya Dou ◽  
Lawrence K. Ma
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sen Sendjaya ◽  
Nathan Eva ◽  
Ivan Butar Butar ◽  
Mulyadi Robin ◽  
Samantha Castles

2017 ◽  
Vol 156 (4) ◽  
pp. 941-956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sen Sendjaya ◽  
Nathan Eva ◽  
Ivan Butar Butar ◽  
Mulyadi Robin ◽  
Samantha Castles

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Tanner ◽  
Adrian Brügger ◽  
Susan van Schie ◽  
Carmen Lebherz

1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob L. Orlofsky ◽  
Connie A. O'Heron

Author(s):  
Aydoğan Durmuş

In this study conducted to research the relationship between leadership behaviors of managers between organizational commitment of employees, a survey has been applied to 155 employees who work in 3 companies in Istanbul province. To measure organizational commitment of employees: "Organizational Commitment Scale" developed by Meyer, Allen ve Smith ; to measure leadership behaviors:" Leadership Behaviors Inventory" of Kent and "Multidimensional Leadership Problems" titled survey forms have been examined and leadership behavior scale which is often used in researches and has been created developing leadership behavior questions based on "Behavioral Repertoire of Leaders" of  Goleman. The data collected by the survey were evaluated by entering into SPSS 22 software. As a result of the application; it has been found that, as autocratic, visionary,  participating and leadership behaviors of managers strengthen, attendance to corporation and normative commitment of employees increase, as educational and relationship oriented behaviors of managers strengthen, attendance to corporation and normative commitment of employees strengthens. As overall satisfaction level of employees with leadership behavior of managers increases, their attendance and normative commitment to organization increased as well.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 1050-1050
Author(s):  
M Dorenkamp ◽  
M Irrgang ◽  
C Jacova ◽  
P Reohr ◽  
S Smith ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Behavioral manifestations of executive dysfunction (e.g., apathy) include internal experiences subject to informant misinterpretation. Self-reports of these functions, however, may be influenced by subjective cognitive concerns (SCC). The purpose of this study was to assess emotional distress and SCC as predictors of self-reported frontal behavior disruption. Method Twenty-one women and 18 men aged 55 to 83 (M = 66), completed measures of emotional functioning and SCC. The Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe) measured frontal behavior concerns, which provided three subscales (Apathy, Disinhibition, Executive Function) and a total score. Emotional functioning was measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire, 9-item (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder, 7-item (GAD-7), and the Dementia Worry Scale (DWS). SCCs were measured using the Cognitive Function- Short-Form 6a (CFSF). Results FrSBe scores were regressed on PHQ-9, GAD-7, CFSF, and DWS. Apathy was predicted by PHQ (B = 1.02, CI: .49 to 1.55, sr2 = .151), CFSF (B = -.42, CI: -.75 to -.10, sr2 = .071), and DWS (B = .14, CI: .02 to .26, sr2 = .052). Disinhibition was predicted by CFSF (B = -.61, CI: -1.06 to -.15, sr2 = .134). Executive dysfunction was predicted by DWS (B = .22, CI: .02 to .41, sr2 = .080). Trends were found for PHQ and CFSF to predict Executive Dysfunction. Conclusions Depression, dementia worry, and SCC predicted aspects of perceived frontal behavior disruption, particularly apathy. Subjective cognitive concern predicted perceived apathy ad disinhibition; dementia worry predicted perceived apathy and executive dysfunction. Depression was only predictive of perceived apathy. These findings support the relationship between depression, dementia worry, SCC, and self-reported behavioral disruption emphasizing the importance of emotions and SCC in self-reported behavioral functioning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document