From advising to mentoring: Toward proactive mentoring in health service psychology doctoral training programs.

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cory L. Cobb ◽  
Byron L. Zamboanga ◽  
Dong Xie ◽  
Seth J. Schwartz ◽  
Alan Meca ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 828-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra A. Foxwell ◽  
Beth D. Kennard ◽  
Cynthia Rodgers ◽  
Kristin L. Wolfe ◽  
Hannah F. Cassedy ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer D. Lundgren ◽  
Susan M. Orsillo

Mentorship in psychology doctoral training is considered by many professionals to be an important mechanism for student learning and development and to be associated with student career outcomes. To date, however, little is known about the empirical basis for mentorship in psychology doctoral training. In this article, we discuss the opportunities for mentorship and developing mentorship competence within the context of formalized doctoral training programs; we review the literature and evidence base for mentorship in general and effective psychology doctoral mentoring in particular; and we examine the barriers to evidence-based mentoring and offer suggestions for building an evidence base using the evidence-based practice (EBP) movement as a model. Finally, we offer reflections on our personal mentoring experiences.


2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Roland-Lévy

Abstract: The aim of doctoral programs in psychology is to help students become competent psychologists, capable of conducting research and of finding suitable employment. Starting with a brief description of the basic organization of the French university system, this paper presents an overview of how the psychology doctoral training is organized in France. Since October 2000, the requisites and the training of PhD students are the same in all French universities, but what now differs is the openness to other disciplines according to the size and location of the university. Three main groups of doctoral programs are distinguished in this paper. The first group refers to small universities in which the Doctoral Schools are constructed around multidisciplinary seminars that combine various themes, sometimes rather distant from psychology. The second group covers larger universities, with a PhD program that includes psychology as well as other social sciences. The third group contains a few major universities that have doctoral programs that are clearly centered on psychology (clinical, social, and/or cognitive psychology). These descriptions are followed by comments on how PhD programs are presently structured and organized. In the third section, I suggest some concrete ways of improving this doctoral training in order to give French psychologists a more European dimension.


1990 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 1159-1161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan S. Raymond ◽  
D. William Wood ◽  
Walter K. Patrick

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harris A. Eyre ◽  
Rob D. Mitchell ◽  
Will Milford ◽  
Nitin Vaswani ◽  
Steven Moylan

Portfolio careers in medicine can be defined as significant involvement in one or more portfolios of activity beyond a practitioner’s primary clinical role, either concurrently or in sequence. Portfolio occupations may include medical education, research, administration, legal medicine, the arts, engineering, business and consulting, leadership, politics and entrepreneurship. Despite significant interest among junior doctors, portfolios are poorly integrated with prevocational and speciality training programs in Australia. The present paper seeks to explore this issue. More formal systems for portfolio careers in Australia have the potential to increase job satisfaction, flexibility and retention, as well as diversify trainee skill sets. Although there are numerous benefits from involvement in portfolio careers, there are also risks to the trainee, employing health service and workforce modelling. Formalising pathways to portfolio careers relies on assessing stakeholder interest, enhancing flexibility in training programs, developing support programs, mentorship and coaching schemes and improving support structures in health services. What is known about the topic? Portfolio careers are well understood as a career structure in general business. However, in medicine little is known about the concept of portfolio careers, their drivers, benefits and risks. There are significant issues faced by the Australian junior medical workforce such as a need for diversified skill-sets (e.g. increased involvement in research, public health and leadership), low job satisfaction for junior doctors and an increasing emphasis of work-life balance and mental well-being. What does this paper add? This paper critically analyses the concept of portfolio careers in the postgraduate setting by critiquing literature on the international and national experiences in this field. This paper outlines potential benefits of portfolio careers requiring further research, such as a diversification in the workforce and improved job satisfaction. Risks include reducing the health service provision capacity of junior doctors and drawing doctors away from a medical career. What are the implications for practitioners? This paper has substantial educational and workforce implications for medical students, junior doctors and medical managers. For medical students and junior doctors this paper frames the possibilities in a medical career, as well as benefits and risks of aiming for a portfolio career in medicine. For medical managers, this paper suggests strategies for further research, enhancing workforce job satisfaction and potential pitfalls of increasing opportunities for medical portfolio careers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document