scholarly journals Is this going to be on the test? Test expectancy moderates the disfluency effect with sans forgetica.

Author(s):  
Jason Geller ◽  
Daniel Peterson
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Davidson ◽  
Peter Jönsson ◽  
Ingegerd Carlsson ◽  
Edward Pace-Schott

Sleep has been found to have a beneficial effect on memory consolidation. It has furthermore frequently been suggested that sleep does not strengthen all memories equally. The aim of this literature review was to examine the studies that have measured whether sleep selectively strengthens certain kinds of declarative memories more than others, depending on such factors as emotion, reward, test-expectancy or different instructions during encoding. The review of this literature revealed that although some support exists that sleep is more beneficial for certain kinds of memories, the majority of studies does not support such an effect. A second aim of this review was to examine which factors during sleep that have been found to selectively benefit certain memories over others, with a special focus on the often-suggested claim that rapid eye movement sleep primarily consolidates emotional memories. The review of this literature revealed that no sleep variable has been reliably found to be specifically associated with the consolidation of certain kinds of memories over others.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 388-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah J. Owens ◽  
Susan A. Graham
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 961-971
Author(s):  
Alexander E. Minnaert

The effect of test expectancy and test anxiety on the retention of prose is not yet profoundly examined in an ecologically valid learning context. The influence of test expectancy, test anxiety, and differences in intelligence on the retention of prose was addressed in the hypothesis that test anxiety would act as a moderator between test expectancy and memory retention of prose. Also examined was whether this relation would still be valid if differences in general intelligence were controlled. University freshmen ( N = 292) participated. Analysis indicated that test anxiety acted as a moderator between test expectancy and prose memory performance, even after controlling for differences in general intelligence. The low and high test-anxious group expecting a retention test seemed to profit from positive arousal elicited by the expectedness of a retention test. The high test-anxious group not expecting a retention test performed in a rather detrimental way on a retention test given negative arousal elicited by the unexpectedness of a retention test. Implications for further research are elaborated and discussed.


1989 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
CarolAnne M. Kardash ◽  
Tirza L. Kroeker

1985 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Hite ◽  
Joseph A. Bellizzi ◽  
Diana Smith Dietvorst

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document