A Comparative Study of the Mode of Action of X-Rays and Alkylating Agents

Nature ◽  
1955 ◽  
Vol 176 (4494) ◽  
pp. 1168-1169 ◽  
Author(s):  
IWAO HIRONO
1969 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 489-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh Mohla ◽  
M. R. N. Prasad

ABSTRACT A comparative study of three non-steroidal anti-oestrogens (a dihydronaphthalene, UlllOOA; a diphenylindene derivative, U-11555A and MRL-41 (clomiphene) was made in order to study their mode of action and their interaction with oestrogen induced biochemical changes in the uterus. Pretreatment with UlllOOA, clomiphene or U11555A effectively blocked the oestrogen induced increase in uterine glycogen and protein synthesis. However, all the three compounds tested were found to be uterotrophic; clomiphene also increased uterine glycogen while U11555A showed a transient oestrogenic action in increasing uterine protein. Clomiphene and U11100A have been shown to inhibit the uptake of oestrogen at the receptor sites. Our results may be interpreted as indicating that pretreatment with these compounds (U11100A, clomiphene or U11555A) blocked the uterine receptor sites in such a manner so as to render ineffective the action of oestrogen administered subsequently.


1951 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 367-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sister Mary Beatrice Schneller
Keyword(s):  

1996 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 263-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Chen ◽  
Elke Nekolla ◽  
Albrecht M. Kellerer
Keyword(s):  
X Rays ◽  

HortScience ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 1154-1165
Author(s):  
Killian Melsen ◽  
Mark van de Wouw ◽  
Ryan Contreras

The promising possibilities of mutation breeding in ornamental plants have led to a great interest in effective mutagenic treatment protocols for various species. This review discusses mutagenic treatments of a large number of ornamental genera, the advantages and disadvantages of various techniques, and the possibilities of improving the associated protocols. A number of nontargeted mutagenesis methods are available, ranging from chemical treatment with alkylating agents to irradiation with X-rays, gamma rays, and neutron or heavy ion beams at various doses. These are all relatively inexpensive and have been proven to be effective mutagens in a large number of diverse species. Genetic engineering, however, remains mostly impractical for many ornamental breeding operations because of the high cost and lack of knowledge necessary to successfully transform and regenerate ornamental crops. Of the available nontargeted mutagens, irradiation with gamma rays is still the most popular. It provides high consistency compared with chemical mutagens, albeit at a seemingly lower mutagenic efficiency. Changes in the radiation dose rate may increase the efficiency, although chronic irradiation over a longer period causes fewer deleterious mutations than the commonly used acute irradiation protocols. Heavy ion beam irradiation may also provide highly consistent mutation induction at higher efficiencies because of the high particle energy associated with these treatments. There are also opportunities to improve chemical mutagenesis. Although the required knowledge of specific gene functions in many ornamentals is still lacking, combination mutagenesis with ethyl methanesulfontate with genetic screening in a process known as TILLING (Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes) may lead to a powerful mutation breeding tool in the future. Mutation breeding is still very useful, and many opportunities are available to improve the existing methods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document