scholarly journals Striving to cure adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma: a role for allogeneic stem cell transplant?

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (12) ◽  
pp. 1549-1555 ◽  
Author(s):  
E H Phillips ◽  
A Hodson ◽  
O Hermine ◽  
A Bazarbachi ◽  
K Cwynarski
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Parikshit Padhi ◽  
Margarita Topalovski ◽  
Radwa El Behery ◽  
Eduardo S. Cantu ◽  
Ramadevi Medavarapu

Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in blast crisis can manifest as either myeloid (more common) or lymphoid blast crisis. Most lymphoblastic crises are of B-cell lineage. T-cell blast crisis is extremely rare, with only a few reported cases. We present a case of a middle-aged man who was diagnosed with CML on peripheral blood and bone marrow biopsy. Because of a generalized lymphadenopathy noted at the time of diagnosis, a lymph node biopsy was also performed, which revealed a T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, BCR/ABL1 positive, with clonal evolution. This is a very rare manifestation of CML in blast crisis with no standard treatment and with poor outcomes despite chemotherapy or allogeneic stem cell transplant. Given its rarity, it would be difficult to develop standard chemotherapy protocols. We believe the treatment for this condition should be similar to any lymphoid blast crisis. The patient was treated with induction chemotherapy (hyper-CVAD regimen) plus dasatinib for 3 cycles followed by sibling-donor allogeneic stem cell transplant and is currently on maintenance dasatinib and has minimal residual disease at this time.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. S421-S422
Author(s):  
Edward Robert Scheffer Cliff ◽  
Thomas Eliot Lew ◽  
Piers Blombery ◽  
Michael Dickinson ◽  
Constantine S. Tam ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3912-3912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Chiara Finazzi ◽  
Cristina Boschini ◽  
Janice Ward ◽  
Charles Craddock ◽  
Alessandro Rambaldi ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Graft-versus-Host Disease (GvHD) is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity following allogeneic stem cell transplant. In vivo T cell depletion by alemtuzumab as part of the transplant conditioning is an effective strategy to reduce the risk of GvHD. While it is recognised that the overall incidence of GvHD is reduced by alemtuzumab, the incidence of chronic GvHD as defined by the National Institute of Health (NIH) consensus criteria, the impact on outcome, and the pattern of organ involvement have not been defined yet in this transplant setting. Methods Consecutive patients (n = 323) undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, between January 1 2008 and June 30 2012 were reviewed in this retrospective, single centre study. Medical records were examined and data regarding the development of GvHD were collected; NIH consensus criteria for diagnosis and staging of chronic GvHD were stringently applied. Clinical characteristics of GvHD occurring in patients transplanted following T cell depletion by alemtuzumab administration (n=248) were compared with those of patients transplanted with a T cell replete graft (n=75). Patients receiving alemtuzumab were mainly treated with reduced-intensity conditioning protocols, while patients in the no-T-cell depletion group were mainly treated with a myeloablative, sibling transplant. Results After a median follow up of 38.4 months, the cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV classic acute GvHD was 35% and 48% for patients transplanted respectively with or without T cell depletion by alemtuzumab (p= 0.041, Figure 1); with a CI of grade III-IV classic acute GvHD of 13% and 27% (p=0.007). The 2-years CI of grade II-IV late acute GvHD was not significantly different in the two groups (20% and 23% for patients respectively treated with or without alemtuzumab, p=0.589, Figure 2). T cell depletion by alemtuzumab significantly reduces the 3 years cumulative incidence of classic chronic GvHD (5% versus 31%, p<0.0001, Figure 3.A), but without a significant difference in the incidence of overlap syndrome between patients with and without T cell depletion (3 years CI respectively 6% and 7%, p=0.839, Figure 3.B). The pattern of organ involvement by classic acute GvHD was similar in patients with and without T cell depletion. The pattern of organ involvement by late acute GvHD in the alemtuzumab group was, however, significantly different compared to the T cell replete group (skin-gut-liver involvement reported respectively in 83%-28%-4% of patients and 56%-48%-20% of patients, p=0.003). Distribution of organ involvement by classic chronic and overlap syndrome was similar in the two groups; however, it seems that alemtuzumab prevents the development of lung GvHD (lung GvHD developed in 4 patients over the 75 patients of the no-T-cell depletion group, while none of the 248 patients transplanted with alemtuzumab experienced lung GvHD). In a multivariate analysis, the development of chronic GvHD was an independent predictor of higher mortality risk (HR 1.66, p = 0.04) and severe NIH global score at peak was confirmed as a poor prognostic factor for survival (HR 2.27, p=0.02). The negative impact of chronic GvHD and of the severe forms of chronic GvHD was independent of age and alemtuzumab administration. Conclusion This retrospective analysis provides for the first time data on the incidence rates of NIH-defined GvHD categories in patients transplanted after T cell depletion by alemtuzumab. Patients transplanted with alemtuzumab experienced a lower incidence of classic acute and classic chronic GvHD compared to patients not receiving T cell depletion. In contrast, alemtuzumab conditioning appeared to have no effect on the incidence of late acute GvHD or overlap syndrome, suggesting that these two entities of GvHD are driven by different immunological mechanisms as compared to classic acute and classic chronic GvHD. We also confirmed the utility of the NIH classification of GvHD and of the NIH global severity score to predict survival in alemtuzumab-conditioned allogeneic stem cell transplant. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2016 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 685-695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Corrales ◽  
Carlos Solano ◽  
Paula Amat ◽  
Estela Giménez ◽  
Rafael de la Cámara ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 680-680
Author(s):  
Sivesh Kathir Kathir Kamarajah ◽  
Behrad Barmayehvar ◽  
Ali Z Gondal ◽  
Ram Malladi ◽  
Sridhar Chaganti

Abstract Introduction: Aggressive T-cell lymphomas often carry poor prognosis. With the exception of ALK+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), median survival for most entities is < 3 years from diagnosis. Whilst stem cell transplant (SCT) consolidation is sometimes used in an attempt to improve survival, its role remains controversial. Encouraging results have been reported with both autologous (ASCT) and allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) but it is unclear if one is better than the other. To inform this debate, we set out to examine outcomes of patients receiving SCT consolidation for aggressive T-cell lymphomas at our institute over a 10-year period (between 2005 Ð 2015), comparing results of ASCT versus allo-SCT. Methods: Review of our transplant database identified 59 patients receiving SCT for T-cell lymphomas between the years 2005 - 2015. We excluded 4 patients with low grade T cell lymphomas (mycosisfungoides/sezarysyndrome) from analysis. A further 4 patients were excluded as they had 2 SCT procedures (ASCT followed by an allo-SCT). Thus, 51 patients were eligible for analysis; all having received a single SCT procedure (either ASCT or allo-SCT) for treatment of aggressive T-cell lymphoma. Results: Median age of the entire cohort at the time of transplant was 54 years (range 18-72 years) with 39 male and 12 female patients. The most frequent histologies were: ALCL (n=13), angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (n=10) and high grade T-NHL/ peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) not further classified (n=16).Thirty sevenof 51 patients had advanced (stage 3 or 4) disease. Median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort were 67 and 23 months respectively. All 30 patients receiving ASCT were conditioned with the BEAM regimen. Of the 21 patients receiving an allo-SCT, sixteen patients had reduced intensity conditioning and 5 myeloablative conditioning with cyclophosphamide and total body radiotherapy. Stem cell source was sibling donor in 11 and unrelated donor in 10patients.Nineteenpatients received a T-cell depleted graft (17 within vivo campath and 2 with ATG). The ASCT and allo-SCT groups were comparable for several baseline variables including tumour stage, LDH, performance status and presence of B symptoms. The allo-SCT cohort was younger with only 24% being over the age of 60 compared to nearly 47% in the ASCT group (median age 45 vs 56.5 years). The allo-SCT cohort had a higher risk disease with only 14 of the 21 patients (68%) being in 1st / 2nd remission at the time of transplant compared with 27 of 30 (90%) in the ASCT group. Furthermore, 16/21 (76%) patients in the allo-SCT cohort received >2 lines of treatment prior to transplant compared to only 2 (7%) in the ASCT cohort. Three patients in the allo-SCT (14%) and 2 in the ASCT (7%) groups were not in remission at the time of SCT. The 5-year OS for the allo-SCT cohort (68%) was significantly superior to the ASCT cohort (36%) (p=0.01). Median OS was significantly superior for the allo-SCT compared to the ASCT cohort (NR vs 21 months, respectively; p=0.03). The 5-year PFS for the allo-SCT cohort (62%) was significantly superior to that of the ASCT (34%) cohort (p= 0.03). The median PFS for the allo-SCT cohort was superior compared to the ASCT cohort (79 vs 17 months, p=0.083). On Cox regression multivariate analysis, disease status at the time of transplant (1st remission vs 2nd remission vs beyond 2nd remission vs not in remission) was significant for predicting both OS and PFS. Prognosis was dismal for those not in remission at the time of transplant with survival of <12 months. Transplant type (Allo vs auto) was significant for OS (HR 0.087, p=0.001) but not for PFS. Conclusion: Our data suggests allo-SCT may confer a survival benefit compared with ASCT for patients with aggressive T-cell lymphomas. This novel observation has not been reported previously and if validated in a larger cohort will be practice changing. Figure 1 Cumulative overall survival for the autologous (ASCT) and allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) cohorts. Figure 1. Cumulative overall survival for the autologous (ASCT) and allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) cohorts. Figure 2 Progression free survival for the autologous (ASCT) and allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) cohorts. Figure 2. Progression free survival for the autologous (ASCT) and allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) cohorts. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document