scholarly journals Comparison of the efficiency of colorectal cancer screening programs based on age and genetic risk for reduction of colorectal cancer mortality

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 832-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Stanesby ◽  
Mark Jenkins
2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 156 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Kerner ◽  
J. Liu ◽  
K. Wang ◽  
S. Fung ◽  
C. Landry ◽  
...  

Across Canada, introduction of the Pap test for cervical cancer screening, followed by mammography for breast cancer screening and, more recently, the fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening, has contributed to a reduction in cancer mortality. However, another contribution of screening has been disparities in cancer mortality between certain populations. Here, we explore the disparities associated with breast and cervical cancer screening and preliminary data concerning disparities in colorectal cancer screening.Although some disparities in screening utilization have been successfully reduced over time (for example, mammography and Pap test screening in rural and remote populations), screening utilization data for other populations (for example, low-income groups) clearly indicate that disparities have existed and continue to exist across Canada. Organized screening programs in Canada have been able to successfully engage 80% of women for regular cervical cancer screening and 70% of women for regular mammography screening, but of the women who remain to be reached or engaged in regular screening, those with the least resources, those who are the most isolated, and those who are least culturally integrated into Canadian society as a whole are overrepresented. Population differences are also observed for utilization of colorectal cancer screening services.The research literature on interventions to promote screening utilization provides some evidence about what can be done to increase participation in organized screening by vulnerable populations. Adaption and adoption of evidence-based screening promotion interventions can increase the utilization of available screening services by populations that have experienced the greatest burden of disease with the least access to screening services.


2018 ◽  
Vol 155 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-98.e10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Korbinian Weigl ◽  
Hauke Thomsen ◽  
Yesilda Balavarca ◽  
Jacklyn N. Hellwege ◽  
Martha J. Shrubsole ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. S-570
Author(s):  
Esther Toes-Zoutendijk ◽  
Isabel Portillo ◽  
Sarah Hoeck ◽  
Annemieke Opstal-van Winden ◽  
Elisabeth F. Peterse ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Alicia Brotons ◽  
Mercedes Guilabert ◽  
Francisco Lacueva ◽  
José Mira ◽  
Blanca Lumbreras ◽  
...  

Colonoscopy services working in colorectal cancer screening programs must perform periodic controls to improve the quality based on patients’ experiences. However, there are no validated instruments in this setting that include the two core dimensions for optimal care: satisfaction and safety. The aim of this study was to design and validate a specific questionnaire for patients undergoing screening colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test, the Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire based on patients’ experience (CSSQP). The design included a review of available evidence and used focus groups to identify the relevant dimensions to produce the instrument (content validity). Face validity was analyzed involving 15 patients. Reliability and construct and empirical validity were calculated. Validation involved patients from the colorectal cancer screening program at two referral hospitals in Spain. The CSSQP version 1 consisted of 15 items. The principal components analysis of the satisfaction items isolated three factors with saturation of elements above 0.52 and with high internal consistency and split-half readability: Information, Care, and Service and Facilities features. The analysis of the safety items isolated two factors with element saturations above 0.58: Information Gaps and Safety Incidents. The CSSQP is a new valid and reliable tool for measuring patient’ experiences, including satisfaction and safety perception, after a colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 190-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mercedes Vanaclocha-Espi ◽  
Josefa Ibáñez ◽  
Ana Molina-Barceló ◽  
Elena Pérez ◽  
Andreu Nolasco ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 122 (9) ◽  
pp. 1338-1342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrina Armstrong ◽  
Jane J. Kim ◽  
Ethan A. Halm ◽  
Rachel M. Ballard ◽  
Mitchell D. Schnall

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document