scholarly journals Lactotripeptides effect on office and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure, blood pressure stress response, pulse wave velocity and cardiac output in patients with high-normal blood pressure or first-degree hypertension: a randomized double-blind clinical trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 1035-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arrigo FG Cicero ◽  
Martina Rosticci ◽  
Beatrice Gerocarni ◽  
Stefano Bacchelli ◽  
Maddalena Veronesi ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
I. V. Leontyeva ◽  
I. A. Kovalev ◽  
M. A. Shkolnikova ◽  
Yu. S. Isayeva ◽  
A. N. Putintsev ◽  
...  

40 adolescents aged 15–17 years with functional cardiovascular pathology of vegetative origin underwent a 24-hour blood pressure monitoring (using the oscillometric method BPLabVasotens, Peter Telegin LLC, Nizhny Novgorod) with an assessment of central blood pressure parameters and rigidity of the main arteries.The scientists found significantly higher values of central systolic pressure during the day and night hours in the group of adolescents with arterial hypertension (n=13) compared to adolescents with normal blood pressure (n=27). They determined significantly higher values of the pulse wave velocity both during 24 hours and in the day and night hours in the group with arterial hypertension compared to the group of adolescents with normal blood pressure. No differences were found in the parameters of the propagation time of the reflected pulse wave and the augmentation index. The time of the reflected pulse wave propagation was significantly lower at nighttime compared to the daytime. In the group with arterial hypertension, the rate of pulse wave propagation in the aorta correlated only with the values of diastolic pressure over 24 hours and diastolic pressure in the daytime. In the adolescents with normal blood pressure, the pulse wave velocity correlated with systolic and pulse blood pressure. The augmentation index in the group of adolescents with arterial hypertension correlated with diastolic pressure, in contrast to the group of adolescents with normal blood pressure, where such a correlation was not detected.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e22-e22
Author(s):  
Sanaz Jamshidi ◽  
Sepideh Hajian ◽  
Nafiseh Rastgoo ◽  
Navid Mohammadi

Introduction: Although some studies have reported the positive effect of sertraline and L-carnitine on intradialytic hypotension (IDH), a common complication of dialysis, however the results are controversial. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of sertraline and L-carnitine on blood pressure in patients with chronic renal failure who were undergoing dialysis. Patients and Methods: This double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 32 hemodialysis patients who suffered from IDH in more than 50% of dialysis sessions. Patients were randomly divided into two groups of sertraline (50 mg daily) and L-carnitine (1000 mg daily), with 16 patients in each group. Duration of treatment was four weeks, then patients were followed up for additional three weeks. The changes in patients’ blood pressure were monitored in each group and the results compared between the two groups. Results: Of all, 18 patients (56%) were female, 14 patients (44%) were male, and their mean (SD) age was 60±15 years. At the end of the study, mean systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were significantly increased in both the sertraline and L-carnitine groups (P<0.05). In addition, nadir SBP, nadir DBP, and nadir MAP in each group were significantly increased compared to pre-treatment period (P<0.001). An increase of more than 5 mm Hg in SBP, DPB, and MAP was observed in half of the subjects in the sertraline group and more than two-thirds of the patients in the L-carnitine group, however there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: The findings of this study showed that the administration of sertraline or L-carnitine for one month could significantly increase SBP, DBP, MAP, and nadir blood pressures in dialysis patients suffering from IDH during dialysis sessions because there was no significant difference between the two drugs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document