scholarly journals A complete decontamination solution

BDJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 227 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-170
2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. McGarvey ◽  
H. D. Durst ◽  
William R. Creasy ◽  
Jill L. Ruth ◽  
Kevin M. Morrissey

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (18) ◽  
pp. 2888-2898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marufa Naznin ◽  
Jiyeon Choi ◽  
Won Sik Shin ◽  
Jaeyoung Choi

2008 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 244-253
Author(s):  
Charles M. Reynolds ◽  
David B. Ringelberg ◽  
Lawrence B. Perry ◽  
George W. Wagner

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-38
Author(s):  
V. V. Shelenkova ◽  
◽  
T. A. Kulagina ◽  

This article analyzes the data on chemical decontamination methods dealing with radioactively contaminated surfaces. It considers the composition of solutions most commonly used for decontamination purposes. Numerical data are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of various decontamination methods. The paper considers an experiment on the decontamination of stainless steel samples with water following a cavitation treatment. The study reveals a dependence between the decontamination efficiency and the treatment time of the contaminated surface with a decontamination solution based on cavitation-activated water, which appears to be comparable with the results of the one involving an alkaline solution.


Author(s):  
Mathieu Ponnet ◽  
Michel Klein ◽  
André Rahier ◽  
Luc Noynaert ◽  
Gérard Aleton

Abstract The dismantling of the BR3-PWR reactor leads to the production of large masses of contaminated metallic pieces, including structural materials, primary pipings, tanks and heat exchangers. One of the main objectives is to demonstrate that we can minimise the volume of radioactive waste in an economical way, by the use of alternative waste routes, such as recycling of material in the nuclear world, free release of material in the conventional industry after melting or free release of material after thorough decontamination. The SCK•CEN launched a decontamination program with the aim to free release as much of the dismantled metallic material as possible. The selected chemical decontamination process, so-called MEDOC® (MEtal Decontamination by Oxidation with Cerium), is based on the use of cerium IV as strong oxidant in sulphuric acid with continuous regeneration using ozone. An industrial installation has been designed and constructed in close collaboration with Framatome-France. This installation started to operate in September 1999 for the treatment of the metallic pieces arising from the dismantling of the BR3 reactor. Since the installation starts up, 21 tons of contaminated material has been treated batchwise with success. Up to now, MEDOC® has been accomplished as a batch process in which the decontamination reactor is loaded with a basket containing the contaminated material. The SCK•CEN is now considering the possibility of using the MEDOC plant to decontaminate large components before cutting them, such as the BR3 -steam generator and the pressurizer. The decontamination solution will be circulated between the MEDOC plant and the steam generator during the consecutive decontamination cycles. Each cycle will comprises a decontamination step followed by a regeneration step. For the steam generator, 30 cycles are estimated to be needed to reach the free release level after melting. The decontamination studies of large components are ongoing and take into account the technical aspects, the radiological and classical safety aspects, as well as financial aspects.


2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 4251-4253
Author(s):  
Woo-Sung Lee ◽  
Hui-Jun Won ◽  
Seon-Byeong Kim ◽  
Sang-Yoon Park ◽  
Chong-Hun Jung ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
John M. Alred ◽  
Bradley D. Moore ◽  
Sara Susca ◽  
Konstantin I. Penanen ◽  
Valentina Ricchiuti ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document