Impact of molecular tumour board discussion on targeted therapy allocation in advanced prostate cancer

Author(s):  
Peter H. J. Slootbeek ◽  
Iris S. H. Kloots ◽  
Minke Smits ◽  
Inge M. van Oort ◽  
Winald R. Gerritsen ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 365-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yien Ning Sophia Wong ◽  
Roberta Ferraldeschi ◽  
Gerhardt Attard ◽  
Johann de Bono

2020 ◽  
Vol 252 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-113
Author(s):  
Dong‐E Tang ◽  
Yong Dai ◽  
Jia‐Xi He ◽  
Lie‐Wen Lin ◽  
Qi‐Xin Leng ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 242-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Yip ◽  
Daniel Khalaf ◽  
Werner J. Struss ◽  
Katherine Sunderland ◽  
Gillian Vandekerkhove ◽  
...  

242 Background: Germline mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, including BRCA2, are present in 6-12% of pts with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). BRCA2 germline mutations are associated with high-grade and poor-prognosis localized disease, while outcomes in pts with advanced prostate cancer continue to be defined. Methods: Germline DNA from 536 consecutive mCRPC pts in our liquid biopsy program were screened for BRCA2 and ATM gene mutations using targeted sequencing. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the median time from androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) initiation to mCRPC, progression free survival (PFS) on first-line androgen receptor (AR) targeted therapy, and overall survival (OS). Outcomes in BRCA2 or ATM germline mutation carriers and a subset of the total sample of HRR wild-type (WT) pts, who had clinical data available (n = 113), were compared using the log-rank test. Results: 26/536 (4.9%) of pts had germline BRCA2 (n = 22) or ATM mutations (n = 4). After ADT initiation, HRR mutated pts progressed to mCRPC with a median time of 13.4 mo compared to 19.0 mo in WT pts (HR = 1.6, [95% CI 1.0-2.5], p = 0.03). HRR mutated pts had a median PFS on first-line AR-targeted therapy in the mCRPC setting of 3.3 mo versus 7.9 mo in WT pts (HR = 2.2, [95% CI 1.3-3.5], p = 0.002). OS for HRR mutated pts from the time of ADT was 57.7 mo in contrast to 104.9 mo in WT pts (HR = 1.8, [95% CI 1.0-3.4], p = 0.07). OS from time of CRPC was 29.7 mo in HRR mutated pts versus 50.3 mo in WT pts (1.6, [95% CI 0.8-2.9], p = 0.16). Conclusions: Germline HRR mutated pts perform poorly with shorter PFS on first-line AR-targeted therapy and time to mCRPC, in contrast to WT pts. These findings support the hypothesis that BRCA2 and ATM gene mutated pts have poor outcomes with current AR-targeted treatments and should be evaluated for alternate regimens.


2010 ◽  
Vol 105 (6) ◽  
pp. 748-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Cora N. Sternberg ◽  
John M. Fitzpatrick ◽  
R. William Watson ◽  
Majid Tabesh

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengfei Liu ◽  
Wei Lou ◽  
Joy C. Yang ◽  
Liangren Liu ◽  
Cameron M. Armstrong ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 320-320
Author(s):  
Sebastien J. Hotte ◽  
Antonio Finelli ◽  
Shawn Malone ◽  
Bobby Shayegan ◽  
Alan I. So ◽  
...  

320 Background: The Canadian GU Research Consortium (GURC) was recently established to bring advanced prostate cancer centres together to collaborate on research, education, and adoption of best practices. As an initial step to inform the work of the GURC, an electronic questionnaire was designed to assess management of advanced prostate cancer care in Canada and how prostate cancer treatments are sequenced in a real-world setting. Methods: A 59-item online questionnaire was developed by a multidisciplinary scientific committee to measure physician practices, patterns of care, treatment sequencing, and management of mCRPC. After pre-testing, the online questionnaire was sent to 93 urologists, uro-oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and general practitioner oncologists who are actively involved in the treatment of prostate cancer. Results: A total of 49 (53%) respondents completed the questionnaire between April 17, 2017 to May 17, 2017. Based on physician reports, the most frequently used treatment for first-line mCRPC was AR-targeted therapy (94%, n = 46 physicians) such as abiraterone acetate plus prednisone and enzalutamide. Among those 46 physicians, AR-targeted therapy was usually followed by docetaxel second-line therapy (57%, 31 physicians). The most common line 1 to line 3 treatment sequence for mCRPC was: AR-targeted therapy--Docetaxel--AR-targeted therapy (35%, 17 physicians), followed by AR-targeted therapy--Docetaxel--Radium 223 (14%, n = 7), Provincial differences were observed in the line 1 to line 3 treatment sequences, which aligned to variation in provincial policies for access to the treatments. In patients previously treated with docetaxel in the hormone sensitive setting, the most frequently used treatment for first-line mCRPC was AR-targeted therapy (76%, 37 physicians). Conclusions: AR targeted therapy followed by docetaxel is the predominant pattern of practice for management of mCRPC, with variability beyond these lines of therapy. Prospective ongoing work through the GURC in research, education and best practices will aim to understand these practice patterns.


2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 593 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Vogiatzi ◽  
M. Cassone ◽  
L. Claudio ◽  
P.P. Claudio

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document