scholarly journals The validity of dietary assessment methods to accurately measure energy intake in children and adolescents who are overweight or obese: a systematic review

2017 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline L. Walker ◽  
Stephen Ardouin ◽  
Tracy Burrows
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Energy Intake ◽  
Dietary Assessment ◽  
Assessment Methods ◽  
Dietary Assessment Methods

scholarly journals Validity of Dietary Assessment in Athletes: A Systematic Review

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Capling ◽  
Kathryn L. Beck ◽  
Janelle A. Gifford ◽  
Gary Slater ◽  
Victoria M. Flood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Energy Intake ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Dietary Assessment ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Assessment Methods ◽  
Food Record ◽  
Dietary Assessment Methods

Dietary assessment methods recognized as appropriate for the general population are usually applied in a similar manner to athletes, despite knowledge that sport-specific factors can complicate assessment and impact accuracy in unique ways. As dietary assessment methods are used extensively within the field of sports nutrition, there is concern the validity of methodologies have not undergone more rigorous evaluation in this unique population sub-group. The purpose was to systematically review studies comparing two or more methods of dietary assessment, including dietary intake measured against biomarkers or reference measures of energy expenditure, in athletes. Six electronic databases were searched for English-language, full-text articles published from January 1980 until June 2016. The search strategy combined the following keywords: diet, nutrition assessment, athlete and validity; where the following outcomes are reported but not limited to: energy intake, macro and/or micronutrient intake, food intake, nutritional adequacy, diet quality, or nutritional status. Meta-analysis was performed on studies with sufficient methodological similarity, with between-group standardized mean differences (or effect size) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) calculated. Of the 1624 studies identified, 18 were eligible for inclusion. Studies comparing self-reported energy intake (EI) to energy expenditure assessed via doubly labelled water were grouped for comparison (n=11) and demonstrated mean EI was under-estimated by 19 % (- 2793 ± 1134 kJ/d). Meta-analysis revealed a large pooled effect size of - 1.006 (95% CI: -1.3 to -0.7; p<0.001). The remaining studies (n=7) compared a new dietary tool or instrument to a reference method(s) (e.g. food record, 24-h dietary recall, biomarker) as part of a validation study. This systematic review revealed there are limited robust studies evaluating dietary assessment methods in athletes. Existing literature demonstrates substantial variability between methods, with under and misreporting of intake frequently observed. There is a clear need for careful validation of dietary assessment methods, including emerging technical innovations, among athlete populations.

Misreporting of Energy Intake in Older People: Comparison of Two Dietary Assessment Methods

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 310-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaëlle Soriano ◽  
S. Goisser ◽  
S. Guyonnet ◽  
B. Vellas ◽  
S. Andrieu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older People ◽  
Energy Intake ◽  
Dietary Assessment ◽  
Assessment Methods ◽  
Dietary Assessment Methods

scholarly journals The validity of technology-based dietary assessment methods in childhood and adolescence: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Matina Kouvari ◽  
Eirini Mamalaki ◽  
Eirini Bathrellou ◽  
Dimitrios Poulimeneas ◽  
Mary Yannakoulia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dietary Assessment ◽  
Assessment Methods ◽  
Childhood And Adolescence ◽  
Dietary Assessment Methods

Validity of image-based dietary assessment methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 2945-2959
Author(s):  
Dang Khanh Ngan Ho ◽  
Sung-Hui Tseng ◽  
Meng-Chieh Wu ◽  
Chun-Kuang Shih ◽  
Anif Prameswari Atika ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Dietary Assessment ◽  
Assessment Methods ◽  
Dietary Assessment Methods

scholarly journals Gender differences in the accuracy of dietary assessment methods to measure energy intake in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e035611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Briar L McKenzie ◽  
Daisy H Coyle ◽  
Tracy Burrows ◽  
Emalie Rosewarne ◽  
Sanne A E Peters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Energy Intake ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Dietary Assessment ◽  
Total Energy Expenditure ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Dietary Assessment Methods ◽  
Research Studies

IntroductionDiet is an important modifiable risk factor for many chronic diseases. Measurement of dietary intake usually relies on self-report, subject to multiple biases. There is a need to understand gender differences in the self-report of dietary intake and the implications of any differences in targeting nutrition interventions. Literature in this area is limited and it is currently unknown whether self-report dietary assessment methods are equally accurate for women and men. The aim of this systematic review is to determine whether there are differences by gender in reporting energy intake compared with a reference measure of total energy expenditure.Methods and analysisA comprehensive search of published original research studies will be performed in MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane library. Original research studies will be included if they were conducted in free-living/unhospitalised adults and included a measure for both women and men of (a) self-reported energy intake and (b) total energy expenditure by doubly labelled water. One author will conduct the electronic database searches, two authors will independently screen studies, conduct a quality appraisal of the included studies using standardised tools and extract data. If further information is needed, then study authors will be contacted. If appropriate, a random-effects meta-analysis will be conducted, with inverse probability weighting, to quantify differences in the mean difference in agreement between reported energy intake and measured energy expenditure between women and men, by self-report assessment method. Subgroup analyses will be conducted by participant factors, geographical factors and study quality.Ethics and disseminationAll data used will be from published primary research studies or deidentified results provided at the discretion of any study authors that we contact. We will submit our findings to a peer-reviewed scientific journal and will disseminate results through presentations at international scientific conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019131715.

scholarly journals Feasibility and Acceptability of Photographic Food Record, Food Diary and Weighed Food Record in People with Serious Mental Illness

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 2862
Author(s):  
Annabel Sandra Mueller-Stierlin ◽  
Scott B. Teasdale ◽  
Uemmueguelsuem Dinc ◽  
Sabrina Moerkl ◽  
Nicole Prinz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Energy Intake ◽  
Serious Mental Illness ◽  
Dietary Assessment ◽  
Dropout Rate ◽  
Individual Variability ◽  
Assessment Methods ◽  
Food Record ◽  
Food Diary ◽  
Dietary Assessment Methods

People with serious mental illness (SMI) experience challenges that may make typical dietary assessment methods less feasible and accurate. This study aims to determine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary validity of a 3-day photographic food record (PR), a 1-day food diary (FD) and a 1-day weighed food protocol (WR) in people with SMI. Participants completed measures at two timepoints, with a 4-week interval. Feasibility and acceptability for each method were measured through four outcomes: percent of completers, quality assessment, number of participants requiring technical devices and satisfaction questionnaire. Relative validity was measured by agreement in estimated energy intake between methods, using Bland–Altman analysis and WR as the benchmark, and prevalence of misreporting, using the Goldberg cut-off method, updated by Black. In total, 63 participants were recruited, with a dropout rate of 19.0% prior to timepoint 1 and additional 6.4% prior to timepoint 2. Quality deficits were identified for all methods. The FD was most acceptable to participants, followed by the PR. The difference in estimated energy intake between assessment methods was not statistically significant, though there was considerable individual variability. Underreporting was considerable across all methods but appeared highest in the PR. A FD and PR present as feasible and acceptable methods for assessing dietary intake in people with SMI. Further validity testing is required. In addition, clear guidance for completion and removal of potential barriers is required for participants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document