Molecular landscape and efficacy of HER2-targeted therapy in patients with HER2-mutated metastatic breast cancer

Abstract Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein overexpression or gene amplification is an important predictive biomarker for identifying patients with breast cancer, who may benefit from HER2-targeted therapy. However, little is known about the molecular landscape and efficacy of HER2-targeted therapy in patients with HER2-mutated metastatic breast cancer. We analysed the HER2 mutation features of 1184 patients with invasive breast cancer. In addition, a single-arm, prospective, phase-II study (NCT03412383) of pyrotinib was conducted in patient with metastatic HER2 amplification-negative, mutation-positive breast cancer. Peripheral blood was collected from each patient and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) sequencing was performed using a 1021 gene panel. HER2 mutations were detected in 8.9% (105/1184) of patients. The HER2 amplification-positive patients had a higher mutation frequency than the HER2 amplification-negative patients (19.5% vs. 4.8%, P < 0.001). A multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that patients with HER2 mutations had a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than HER2 wild-type patients (median PFS 4.7 months vs. 11.0 months, hazard ratio 2.65, 95% confidence interval 1.25–5.65, P = 0.011). Ten HER2 amplification-negative, mutation-positive patients who received pyrotinib monotherapy were ultimately included in the efficacy analysis. The median PFS was 4.9 months. The objective response rate (complete response + partial response) was 40.0% and the clinical benefit rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease over 24 weeks) was 60%. In conclusion, a HER2 gene mutation analysis is potentially useful to identify biomarkers of trastuzumab resistance in HER2 amplification-positive patients. Patients with HER2-mutated, non-amplified metastatic breast cancers may benefit from pyrotinib.

Download Full-text

Activity of Exemestane in Metastatic Breast Cancer After Failure of Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitors: A Phase II Trial

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2000.18.11.2234 ◽

2000 ◽

Vol 18 (11) ◽

pp. 2234-2244 ◽

Cited By ~ 238

Author(s):

Per Eystein Lønning ◽

Emilio Bajetta ◽

Robin Murray ◽

Michèle Tubiana-Hulin ◽

Peter D. Eisenberg ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽

Partial Response ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Phase Ii Trial ◽

Objective Response ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Complete Response ◽

Attractive Alternative ◽

Hormonal Therapies

PURPOSE: To evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of a new steroidal aromatase inactivator, exemestane, in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer who had progressive disease (PD) after treatment with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase II trial, eligible patients were treated with exemestane 25 mg daily (n = 241) followed, at the time PD was determined, by exemestane 100 mg daily (n = 58). RESULTS: On the basis of the intent-to-treat analysis by independent review, exemestane 25 mg produced objective responses in 6.6% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8% to 10.6%) and overall success (complete response + partial response + no change for 24 weeks or longer) in 24.3% (95% CI, 19.0% to 30.2%). The median durations of objective response and overall success were 58.4 weeks (95% CI, 49.7 to 71.1 weeks) and 37.0 weeks (95% CI, 35.0 to 39.4 weeks), respectively. Increasing the dose of exemestane to 100 mg upon the development of PD produced one partial response (1.7%; 95% CI, 0.0% to 9.2%). Both dosages were well tolerated and were discontinued because of adverse events in only 1.7% of patients. CONCLUSION: Exemestane 25 mg once daily seems to be an attractive alternative to chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer after multiple hormonal therapies have failed.

Download Full-text

Gemcitabine in metastatic breast cancer

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.10735 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. 10735-10735 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

A. Bensalem ◽

K. Bouzid

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽

Clinical Benefit ◽

Objective Response ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Complete Response ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

First Line Treatment

10735 Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) has shown efficacy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We conducted studies with GEM-based regimens to assess the efficacy and toxicity of GEM combined with other drugs in MBC. GEM was combined with docetaxel (DXL) in pre-treated MBC with an anthracycline-based regimen and GEM was combined with doxorubicin (DXR) in chemonaive patients (pts) with MBC. The studies’ objectives were to show clinically relevant hematologic toxicity and response rates among pts treated with GEM-DXL either in combination in pre-treated pts with anthracycline regimen or GEM-DXR in chemonaive pts with MBC to assess the efficacy of GEM in MBC either in neoadjuvant or first-line treatment. Methods: For GEM-DXL: 42 pts were enrolled; GEM: 1250 mg /m2 D1 & D8, DXL: 75 mg /m2 D1, every 21 days with classical premedication for DXL. For GEM-DXR: 51 pts were enrolled; GEM: 1250 mg /m2 D1 & D 8, DXR: 25 mg/m2 D1 & D8, every 21 days. Results: See table below. In the GEM-DXR group, surgery was performed in 30 pts, and 13 (43.2%) had histologically complete response. The median TTP in this group was 13.3 months (range, 2–53). Conclusions: GEM in MBC is very efficient and produced an interesting objective response and clinical benefit. This activity is consistent in either chemonaive pts or in pts with relapsing breast cancer. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

The combination of capecitabine and cyclophosphamide for metastatic breast cancer patients

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.e12025 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e12025-e12025

Author(s):

M. Suzuki ◽

I. Kimijima ◽

M. Ishii

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Medical Center ◽

Objective Response ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Complete Response ◽

Preclinical Study ◽

Synergistic Activity ◽

Breast Cancer Patients

e12025 Background: Capecitabine (X) is converted into 5-FU by thymidine phospholylase (TP). Cyclophosphamide (C) has been shown to make TP higher in the preclinical study. Therefore, the combination of capecitabine and cyclophosphamide (XC) is thought to have a synergistic activity. We explored the efficacy of XC for metastatic breast cancer patients. Methods: 50 metastatic breast cancer patients were treated with XC in our medical center between April 2004 and December 2008. Median patient age was 58 years old (range: 34–79 years old). 36 patients were postmenopausal. X was 1675mg/m2 days 1–21 and C was 67mg/m2 days 1–14 on a 28-day cycle in all-oral combination. This therapy was continued until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicities occurring. Results: Median time to treatment failure was 28 weeks (range: 2–158 weeks). 9 patients were not evaluable for tumor response. Among 41 evaluable patients, complete response (CR) was observed in 2.4% (1 patient) and partial response (PR) was 29.2% (12 patients). Stable disease (SD) was 41.4% (17 patients) and progression of the disease (PD) was 26.8% (11 patients). The objective response rate (CR+PR) was 31.7% and the overall clinical benefit (CR+PR+SDÅÜ24 weeks) was 53.6%. Significant toxicities were uncommon: grade 3 toxicities were encountered for neutropenia in 1 patient, anorexia in 1 patient and hand-foot syndrome in 2 patients. Conclusions: XC is an effective regimen in metastatic breast cancer, and this therapy is of an easy administration and very well tolerated. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Capecitabine maintenance therapy after docetaxel/capecitabine combination chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e12018 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e12018-e12018

Author(s):

Pinar Gursoy ◽

Zeki Gokhan Surmeli ◽

Burcu Cakar ◽

Cagatay Arslan ◽

Baha Zengel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Single Agent ◽

Objective Response ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Complete Response ◽

Response To Treatment ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Metastatic Sites

e12018 Background: Addition of capecitabine to docetaxel improves survival outcomes compared with single agent docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this study we analyzed efficacy of maintenance therapy with single agent capecitabine after six cycles of docetaxel/capecitabine chemotherapy in MBC patients. Methods: Patients with metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer were included. Six cycles of docetaxel (75mg/m2 q3wk) / capecitabine (1650mg/m2/day on days 1 to 14) followed by capecitabine (2000 mg/m2/day on days 1 to 14) were administered. Demographic features, progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and response to treatment were recorded. Results: Fifty-four patients were included. Thirty-five patients (65%) were postmenopausal, and 40 (74%) were ER/PR positive. Median age was 53 (range 28 – 70). Number of metastatic sites was one in 23 patients, two in 21, three or more in 10 patients. Most common metastatic sites were bone (67%), lymph nodes (33%), lungs (30%), liver (13%); 13 patients (24%) had bone only disease. Forty-four (81.5%) patients received treatment in first-line, 10 (18.5%) received in second line setting. Median number of cycles applied (including docetaxel/capecitabine combination) was 9 (range 2 – 31, total 576). Median PFS was 9 months (10.4 for hormone receptor positive, 7.3 for negative patients) and median OS was 28 months. Objective response was assessable in 38 patients. Overall response rate (partial + complete response) was 42.6% (95% CI 29.6 – 55.6) with 1 complete response. Toxicities were evaluated in 41 patients; grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 10% and grade 3/4 hand-foot syndrome was observed in 24% of patients. Dose reduction was performed in capecitabine in 37%, and in docetaxel in 20% of patients. Conclusions: Maintenance with single agent capecitabine therapy after six cycles of docetaxel/capecitabine chemotherapy is an effective and tolerable treatment option for HER2 negative MBC patients.

Download Full-text

Russian multicenter experience of using talazoparib in the treatment of patients with BRCA-associated metastatic breast cancer

Medical Council ◽

10.21518/2079-701x-2020-20-143-149 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 143-146

Author(s):

T. Yu. Semiglazova ◽

E. V. Lubennikova ◽

L. V. Bolotina ◽

R. V. Orlova ◽

F. V. Moiseenko ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽

Targeted Therapy ◽

Disease Control ◽

Metastatic Disease ◽

Triple Negative ◽

Objective Response ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Biological Subtype ◽

Triple Negative Subtype

Introduction. The presence of a germinal BRCA mutation occurs in 3–4% of all breast cancer (BC) patients with various biological subtypes, but significantly with a high frequency in patients with a triple negative biological subtype (in 10–20% of cases). For the treatment of patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer associated with gBRCA mutation, the effectiveness of biologically targeted drugs from the group of PARP inhibitors (olaparib and talazoparib) has been proven.Purpose. Comparison of the results of our experience with the use of talazoparib in patients with HER2-gBRCA+ + mBC with the data of the EMBRACA registration study.Materials and methods. As part of the multicenter compassionate use program (CUP) with the support of Pfizer, 24 patients with HER2-negative metastatic gBRCA-associated mutation metastatic breast cancer (HER2-gBRCA+ breast cancer) received biologically targeted therapy with the PARP inhibitor talazoparib at a standard oral dose of 1 mg per day for vital indications . The average age of patients with HER2-gBRCAm+ breast cancer was 50 years (29–90 years).Results. Objective response (OR) was registered in 29% of cases, disease control (OR+stabilization) – in 71% of cases. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.5 months (95% CI [3–10]). Objective response, disease control, and median PFS were evaluated depending on the biological subtype, the number of lines of previous therapy, and the presence of platinum-containing agents in the anamnesis.Objective response and disease control were evaluated depending on the biological subtype: in patients with ER+HER2-mBC versus patients with triple negative subtype, OR was 33% vs 22%, and disease control was 83% vs 61%, respectively. In the presence of < 3 vs ≥ 3 lines of therapy for metastatic disease in the anamnesis, OR was 31% vs 12.5%, disease control – 75% vs 50% of cases, respectively. In the presence or absence of platinum-containing agents in the anamnesis, OR was observed in 22% vs 33% of cases, and disease control – 67% vs 67%, respectively.In patients with the luminal subtype versus patients with the triple negative subtype, the PFS was 9 months vs 5 months, respectively (HR = 0.705; 95% CI [0.231–2.147]; p = 0.5208). Median PFS in the presence of <3 vs ≥3 lines of therapy for metastatic disease in the anamnesis was 9 months vs 4 months, respectively (HR = 4,216; 95% CI [1,334–13,327]; p = 0.0056). In the presence or absence of platinum-containing agents in previous lines of therapy 5 months vs 9.5 months, respectively (HR =1.484; 95% CI [0.48–4.582]; p = 0.4750).During the treatment with talazoparib adverse events of the 3rd-4th grades were observed in 5 patients (20,8%). These include moderate and severe anemia in 3 patients (12.5%), thrombocytopenia in 1 patient (4%), and neutropenia in 1 patient (4%). The majority of patients (79,5%), which received talazoparib, did not require dose adjustment. The need to reduce the dose to 0.75 mg was noted in 3 patients (12.5%), to 0.5 mg – in 2 patients (8%). Hemotransfusion was performed in 3 patients. For effective therapy safety management regular monitoring of blood parameters is necessary.Conclusion. Thus, targeted therapy with talazoparib is an effective treatment option for HER2-gBRCA+ mBC.

Download Full-text

Docetaxel plus capecitabine in the treatment of previous anthracycline-treated patients with metastatic breast cancer

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.e12014 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e12014-e12014

Author(s):

A. Bensalem ◽

K. Bouzid

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽

Liver Toxicity ◽

Objective Response ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Response Duration ◽

Complete Response ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Median Response ◽

Metastatic Sites

e12014 Background: Anthracyclines have been considered the challenge of the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Docetaxel has changed this belief. We conducted a study in previously anthracyclines treated metastatic breast cancer by the regimen docetaxel 75 mg/m2 Day 1 - capecitabine 2500 mg/m2 day split-up over 2 daily doses from Day 1 to Day 14; every 21 Days. Methods: Patients were eligible if they had metastatic breast cancer after an adjuvant setting by anthracyclines. All patients had measurable disease, PS ≤ 2, adequate organ function. Results: From April 2004 to June 2006, 18 patients were enrolled in the study and were evaluated for the toxicity and preliminary responses to the treatment. 100 % of patients had metastatic breast cancer. The sites of metastases were liver in 14 ( 77.7%), lung in 5 (27.7%) and bone in 9 (50%). 11 patients (61.1%) had 1 or 2 metastatic sites, 7 (38.9%) had 3 metastatic sites. All of 18 patients were assessed for toxicity. The main toxicities were as follows: neutropenia grade 3 in 3 patients (16.6 %), anemia grade 2–3 in 2 patients (11.1%), fatigue in 2 patients (11.1%), hand-foot syndrome in 7 patients (38.9%), vomiting-nausea in 4 patients (22.2%), diarrhea in 2 patients (11.1%), liver toxicity in 3 patients (16.6%). The objective response was obtained in 8 patients (44.4%) (Complete response in 3 patients (16.6%), partial response in 5 patients (27.7%). Median response duration was 9 months (range 4 - 17). 7 Patients (38.9%) had stable disease, progression was observed in 3 (16.6%) of patients. Conclusions: In this preliminary analysis, the combination of docetaxel - capecitabine in the treatment of previously anthracyclines treated metastatic breast cancer appears to be an active schedule. It is safe and active, with a manageable toxicity profile and a good clinical activity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Phase II Trial of Doxorubicin and Paclitaxel Plus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.1999.17.12.3828 ◽

1999 ◽

Vol 17 (12) ◽

pp. 3828-3834 ◽

Cited By ~ 46

Author(s):

Joseph A. Sparano ◽

Ping Hu ◽

Radha M. Rao ◽

Carla I. Falkson ◽

Antonio C. Wolff ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Response Rate ◽

Phase Ii Trial ◽

Complete Response Rate ◽

Objective Response ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Complete Response ◽

Institutional Setting

PURPOSE: Several groups have reported that the combination of doxorubicin plus paclitaxel given as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion for up to eight cycles produces a high response rate (> 80%) and complete response rate (> 20%) in metastatic breast cancer, but is also complicated by a 20% incidence of congestive heart failure (CHF). The purpose of this phase II trial was to evaluate the antineoplastic activity of the regimen in a multi-institutional setting and to reduce the incidence of cardiotoxicity by limiting treatment to a maximum of six cycles. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients with advanced breast cancer received doxorubicin (60 mg/m2 by IV injection) followed 15 minutes later by paclitaxel (200 mg/m2 by IV infusion over 3 hours) every 3 weeks for four to six cycles. RESULTS: Objective responses occurred in 25 of 48 assessable patients (52%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 38% to 66%), including four complete responses (8%; 95% CI, 0% to 16%). The median cumulative doxorubicin dose given was 240 mg/m2 (range, 132 to 360 mg/m2). Eleven patients (21%) were documented as having a decrease in the LVEF below normal, including three patients (6%; 95% CI, 0% to 12%) who developed CHF. CONCLUSION: The doxorubicin/paclitaxel regimen that we used is unlikely to produce an objective response rate of more than 70% and a complete response rate of more than 20% in patients with metastatic breast cancer, and proved to be excessively cardiotoxic for use in the adjuvant setting.

Download Full-text

Phase III Study of Intravenous Vinorelbine in Combination With Epirubicin Versus Epirubicin Alone in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Scandinavian Breast Group Trial (SBG9403)

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2004.11.503 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 22 (12) ◽

pp. 2313-2320 ◽

Cited By ~ 46

Author(s):

Bent Ejlertsen ◽

Henning T. Mouridsen ◽

Sven T. Langkjer ◽

Jorn Andersen ◽

Johanna Sjöström ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽

Response Rate ◽

Complete Response Rate ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Severe Toxicity ◽

Free Survival

Purpose To determine whether the addition of intravenous (IV) vinorelbine to epirubicin increased the progression-free survival in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods A total of 387 patients were randomly assigned to receive IV epirubicin 90 mg/m2 on day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, or epirubicin 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1. Both regimens were given every 3 weeks for a maximum of 1 year but discontinued prematurely in the event of progressive disease or severe toxicity. In addition, epirubicin was discontinued at a cumulative dose of 1,000 mg/m2 (950 mg/m2 from June 1999). Prior anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy and prior chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer was not allowed. Reported results were all based on intent-to-treat analyses. Results Overall response rates to vinorelbine and epirubicin, and epirubicin alone, were 50% and 42%, respectively (P = .15). The complete response rate was significantly superior in the combination arm (17% v 10%; P = .048) as was median duration of progression-free survival (10.1 months v 8.2 months; P = .019). Median survival was similar in the two arms (19.1 months v 18.0 months; P = .50). Leukopenia related complications, stomatitis, and peripheral neuropathy were more common in the combination arm. The incidences of cardiotoxicity and constipation were similar in both arms. Conclusion Addition of vinorelbine to epirubicin conferred a significant advantage in terms of complete response rate and progression-free survival, but not in terms of survival.

Download Full-text