scholarly journals Phenotypic discordance between primary and metastatic breast cancer in the large-scale real-life multicenter French ESME cohort

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Grinda ◽  
Natacha Joyon ◽  
Amélie Lusque ◽  
Sarah Lefèvre ◽  
Laurent Arnould ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Tumour Progression ◽  
Primary Tumour ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Risk Of Death

AbstractExpression of hormone receptor (HR) for estrogens (ER) and progesterone (PR) and HER2 remains the cornerstone to define the therapeutic strategy for breast cancer patients. We aimed to compare phenotypic profiles between matched primary and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in the ESME database, a National real-life multicenter cohort of MBC patients. Patients with results available on both primary tumour and metastatic disease within 6 months of MBC diagnosis and before any tumour progression were eligible for the main analysis. Among the 16,703 patients included in the database, 1677 (10.0%) had available biopsy results at MBC diagnosis and on matched primary tumour. The change rate of either HR or HER2 was 27.0%. Global HR status changed (from positive = either ER or PR positive, to negative = both negative; and reverse) in 14.2% of the cases (expression loss in 72.5% and gain in 27.5%). HER2 status changed in 7.8% (amplification loss in 45.2%). The discordance rate appeared similar across different biopsy sites. Metastasis to bone, HER2+ and RH+/HER2- subtypes and previous adjuvant endocrine therapy, but not relapse interval were associated with an HR discordance in multivariable analysis. Loss of HR status was significantly associated with a risk of death (HR adjusted = 1.51, p = 0.002) while gain of HR and HER2 discordance was not. In conclusion, discordance of HR and HER2 expression between primary and metastatic breast cancer cannot be neglected. In addition, HR loss is associated with worse survival. Sampling metastatic sites is essential for treatment adjustment.

scholarly journals Enrollment of Older Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in First Line Clinical Trials: 9-Year Experience of the Large-Scale Real-Life Multicenter French ESME Cohort

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Bringuier ◽  
Matthieu Carton ◽  
christelle Levy ◽  
Anne Patsouris ◽  
David Pasquier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
First Line

Abstract Purpose: Older cancer patients are underrepresented in clinical trials. We aimed to understand barriers to clinical trial recruitment in women aged 70 years old (yo) or over with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Methods: We used the national Epidemio-Strategy and Medical Economics MBC Data Platform, a French multi-center real life database. We selected MBC women over 70yo, without central nervous system metastases, with at least one line of systemic treatment, between January 1st, 2008 and December 31st, 2016, and had no other cancer in the 5 years before MBC. The primary objective was to evaluate the proportion of patients enrolled in clinical trials according to their age. Secondary objective was to identify variables associated with enrollment.Results: 5552 women were aged ≥ 70 (median 74yo; IQR72-77). 14611 were less than 70. Of the older ones, 239 (4%) were enrolled in a clinical trial during first line of treatment, compared with 1529 (10.5%) for younger ones. Multivariable analysis of variables predicting for enrollment during first line of treatment in older patients were younger age (OR 0.50 [95%CI; 0.33-0.76] for the 80-85yo class; OR 0.17 [95%CI; 0.06-0.39] for the 85yo and more class), good ECOG Performance Status (PS 0-1) (OR 0.15 [95%CI; 0.08-0.27] for the PS 2-4 class), HER2+ disease (OR 1.78 [95%CI; 1.27-2.48]), type of treatment (chemotherapy/targeted therapy/immunotherapy OR 5.01 [95%CI; 3.13-8.18]), and period (OR 1.65 [95%CI; 1.22–2.26] for 2012-2016, compared to 2008-2011).Conclusions: In this large database, few older MBC patients were enrolled in a trial compared with younger ones.

scholarly journals Prognosis of Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer by HER2 Status and Trastuzumab Treatment: An Institutional-Based Review

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaheenah Dawood ◽  
Kristine Broglio ◽  
Aman U. Buzdar ◽  
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi ◽  
Sharon H. Giordano
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
First Line ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Trastuzumab Treatment

Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine whether trastuzumab improves prognosis of women with metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/neu –positive breast cancer beyond that of women with HER2/neu-negative disease. Patients and Methods Two thousand ninety-one women with metastatic breast cancer diagnosed from 1991 to 2007, with known HER2/neu status and who had not received trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting, were identified. Disease was classified into the following three groups: HER2/neu negative, HER2/neu positive without first-line trastuzumab treatment, and HER2/neu positive with first-line trastuzumab treatment. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method and compared between groups with the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine associations between OS and HER2/neu status after controlling for patient characteristics. Results One hundred eighteen patients (5.6%) had HER2/neu-positive disease without trastuzumab treatment, 191 (9.1%) had HER2/neu-positive disease and received trastuzumab treatment, and 1,782 (85.3%) had HER2/neu-negative disease. Median-follow-up was 16.9 months. One-year survival rates among patients with HER2/neu-negative disease, HER2/neu-positive disease and trastuzumab treatment, and HER2/neu-positive disease and no trastuzumab treatment were 75.1% (95% CI, 72.9% to 77.2%), 86.6% (95% CI, 80.8% to 90.8%), and 70.2% (95% CI, 60.3% to 78.1%), respectively. In a multivariable model, women with HER2/neu-positive disease who received trastuzumab had a 44% reduction in the risk of death compared with women with HER2/neu-negative disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.69; P < .0001). This HR varied with time and was significant for the first 24 months and not significant after 24 months. Conclusion Our results show that women with HER2/neu-positive disease who received trastuzumab had improved prognosis compared with women with HER2/neu-negative disease.

Lapatinib and HER2 status: Results of a meta-analysis of randomized phase III trials in metastatic breast cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 410-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eitan Amir ◽  
Alberto Ocaña ◽  
Bostjan Seruga ◽  
Orit Freedman ◽  
Mark Clemons
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Phase Iii Trials

Is It The Time That We Can Depend on Bioscore as a New Staging System in Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer to Predict the Disease-Free Survival?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rehab Farouk Mohamed ◽  
Donia Hussein Abd El Hameed ◽  
Mohamed Alaa Eldeen Hassan
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Purpose: Novel molecular characterization of breast cancer with cellular markers has allowed a new classification that offers prognostic value. This study investigates the prognostic value of the Bioscore among non-metastatic breast cancer patients with respect to disease free survival (DFS).Methods: This study included 317 patients with non-metastatic surgically treated breast cancer; they were identified in the period from January 2015 to December 2018 at Clinical Oncology Department of Assiut University Hospital. Many variables were used; pathologic stage (PS), T stage (T), nodal stage (N), grade (G), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) status. Univariate & two multivariate analyses were performed to identify which of these variables are associated with disease-free survival (DFS). Results: The only significant factors in the Univariate analysis were PS3, T2, T3, T4, N3, G2, G3, ER -ve, PR -ve, and HER2 –ve. The factors which were significant in the first multivariate analysis; PS3, G3, ER –ve, and in the second one were; T2, T4, N3, G3, and ER –ve. Two sets of models were built to determine the utility of combining variables. Models incorporating G and E status had the highest C-index (0.72) for T+N + G + ER in comparison with (0.69) for (PS+ G + ER) and the lowest AIC (953.01) for T + N + G + E and (966.9) for PS + G + E. Conclusions: This study confirms the prognostic significance of bioscore in non-metastatic breast cancer in concerning DFS.

Cancer disparities among patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18566-e18566
Author(s):  
Diana Saravia ◽  
Leah Elson ◽  
Hong Liang ◽  
Nadeem Bilani ◽  
Elizabeth Blessing Elimimian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormonal Therapy ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Receptor Status ◽  
Risk Of Death

e18566 Background: We previously elucidated sociodemographic factors associated with risk-of-death, in a subgroup of patients with Stage IV human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER)+ breast cancer. To further understand determinants of disparities in all subgroups of stage IV breast cancer, this study sought to evaluate factors which are predictive of overall survival (OS) in a cohort of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), according to the following subtypes: 1) estrogen receptor (ER)+ or progesterone receptor (PR)+ and (HER)-, (2) (ER+ or PR+) and HER+, (3) (ER- and PR-) and HER-, or (4) (ER- and PR-) and HER+. Methods: Study population included patients with MBC, extracted from the National Cancer Database, treated between 2010 and 2016. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics, and chi-square tests were performed to compare patient characteristics, by ethnic group (white, black, Hispanic, Asian, and other). Multivariate Cox regression models with backward elimination (using significance level of p<0.05) were utilized to compare overall survival among patient cohorts. In addition, Kaplan-Meier survival curves of patient cohort were also produced. Statistics were performed using SAS. Results: Records from n= 47,032 patients were included, the majority were 50 years or older, white, and treated with hormonal therapy. With a median follow-up time of 2.3 years, disparities in OS were observed; black patients were more likely to suffer death (HR=1.12 (1.08-1.16), p<0.0001), compared to white patients. Additional factors contributing to risk of death in MBC included: being male (HR=1.12, (1.02-1.23), p=0.019), having visceral involvement compared to bone only (HR=1.52, (1.05-1.28), p<0.0001), income < $38,000 (HR=1.13 (1.09-1.17), p<0.0001), being on government insurance (HR=1.24, (1.20-1.27), p<0.0001, and having Triple Negative Breast Cancer (ER- and PR-) and HER- status (HR=1.68 (1.60-1.75) p<0.0001). Patients who receive chemotherapy, not hormonal therapy (HR=1.25 (1.2 – 1.3), p<0.0001), were found to have worse prognosis possibly reflecting biology of disease at presentation and lack of specific targeted therapy. Conclusions: This study confirms that sociodemographic disparities exist in OS among patients within the same stage of MBC, and regardless of receptor status subtypes. Clinical practice should focus on closing disparities gaps for those with advanced and MBC, especially among Black, impoverished, and male patients. Better treatment approaches should be sought for patients with visceral metastasis and those diagnosed with triple negative receptor status, who continue to suffer from worse outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document