scholarly journals Management of respiratory tract infections in young children—A qualitative study of primary care providers’ perspectives

Author(s):  
Ruby Biezen ◽  
Bianca Brijnath ◽  
Danilla Grando ◽  
Danielle Mazza
2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Kambli ◽  
Daniel Flach ◽  
René Schwendimann ◽  
Eva Cignacco

AbstractBackground: Changing demographic and economic factors are producing serious challenges to Switzerland’s primary care providers: meeting the population’s growing needs will require redevelopment and reorganization. Large-scale community-based care can be expanded via alternative care models, including walk-in-clinics (WIC) stuffed by interdisciplinary teams, with Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) playing key roles in the treatment of minor complaints.Aims: To reveal the proportion of adult patients within five exemplary diagnostic groups (respiratory tract infections, earaches, hearing impairments, urinary tract infections and wounds) who could be treated by APNs in a Swiss urban WIC in order to develop a future model of multidisciplinary collaboration between APN and physicians. Methods: A retrospective data analysis was performed on WIC’s medical records. Reflecting seasonal variations, a one-month patient data sample was collected for each of four consecutive seasons (July and October 2010, January and April 2011). Data analyses included calculations of frequencies of individual diagnoses and of diagnostic groups.Results: Of a combined sample of 5,130 patient consultations, 53% (n=2,733) fit within the scope of APN competencies. The most common diagnoses concerned minor wounds (24%; n=1,240) and upper respiratory tract infections (18%; n=926).Conclusion: Based on this study’s results, we conclude that assigning APNs to primary care clinics would contribute a meaningful new professional role to Switzerlands healthcare system. Further research will be necessary to evaluate the effects of such implementation on inter-professional collaboration and patient outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Milena Bergmann ◽  
Jörg Haasenritter ◽  
Dominik Beidatsch ◽  
Sonja Schwarm ◽  
Kaja Hörner ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cough is a relevant reason for encounter in primary care. For evidence-based decision making, general practitioners need setting-specific knowledge about prevalences, pre-test probabilities, and prognosis. Accordingly, we performed a systematic review of symptom-evaluating studies evaluating cough as reason for encounter in primary care. Methods We conducted a search in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Eligibility criteria and methodological quality were assessed independently by two reviewers. We extracted data on prevalence, aetiologies and prognosis, and estimated the variation across studies. If justifiable in terms of heterogeneity, we performed a meta-analysis. Results We identified 21 eligible studies on prevalence, 12 on aetiology, and four on prognosis. Prevalence/incidence estimates were 3.8–4.2%/12.5% (Western primary care) and 10.3–13.8%/6.3–6.5% in Africa, Asia and South America. In Western countries the underlying diagnoses for acute cough or cough of all durations were respiratory tract infections (73–91.9%), influenza (6–15.2%), asthma (3.2–15%), laryngitis/tracheitis (3.6–9%), pneumonia (4.0–4.2%), COPD (0.5–3.3%), heart failure (0.3%), and suspected malignancy (0.2–1.8%). Median time for recovery was 9 to 11 days. Complete recovery was reported by 40.2- 67% of patients after two weeks, and by 79% after four weeks. About 21.1–35% of patients re-consulted; 0–1.3% of acute cough patients were hospitalized, none died. Evidence is missing concerning subacute and chronic cough. Conclusion Prevalences and incidences of cough are high and show regional variation. Acute cough, mainly caused by respiratory tract infections, is usually self-limiting (supporting a “wait-and-see” strategy). We have no setting-specific evidence to support current guideline recommendations concerning subacute or chronic cough in Western primary care. Our study presents epidemiological data under non non-pandemic conditions. It will be interesting to compare these data to future research results of the post-pandemic era.


BMJ ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 347 (oct25 2) ◽  
pp. f6041-f6041 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Little ◽  
M. Moore ◽  
J. Kelly ◽  
I. Williamson ◽  
G. Leydon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document