scholarly journals Quality Measurement of Two-dimensional Shear Wave Speed Imaging for Breast Lesions: the Associated Factors and the Impact to Diagnostic Performance

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan-Dan Li ◽  
Hui-Xiong Xu ◽  
Bo-Ji Liu ◽  
Xiao-Wan Bo ◽  
Xiao-Long Li ◽  
...  
Oncotarget ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 4948-4959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo-Ji Liu ◽  
Chong-Ke Zhao ◽  
Hui-Xiong Xu ◽  
Yi-Feng Zhang ◽  
Jun-Mei Xu ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Long Li ◽  
Wei-Wei Ren ◽  
Hui-Jun Fu ◽  
Ya-Ping He ◽  
Qiao Wang ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
pp. 585-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kui Lin ◽  
Joyce R. McLaughlin ◽  
Ashley Thomas ◽  
Kevin Parker ◽  
Benjamin Castaneda ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyeonga Kim ◽  
Jieun Lee ◽  
Jaebeom So ◽  
Yong-seok Jang ◽  
Mingyu Jung ◽  
...  

Given the broad overlap of normal and abnormal liver tissue in the subjective evaluation of the liver in conventional B-mode ultrasonography, there is a need for a non-invasive and quantitative method for the diagnosis of liver disease. Novel two-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2-D SWE) can measure tissue stiffness by propagation of the shear wave induced using acoustic radiation force impulse in real time. To the best of our knowledge, two-dimensional shear-wave measurement of the liver in cats has not been reported to date. This study assessed the feasibility, reliability, normal values, and related influencing factors of 2-D SWE for assessment of the feline liver without anesthesia and breath-holding. Two-dimensional shear-wave ultrasonography was performed by two evaluators at the right and left sides of the liver. Twenty-nine client-owned clinically healthy adult cats were included. The means and standard deviations for the shear-wave speed and stiffness in the right liver were 1.52 ± 0.13 m/s and 6.94 ± 1.26 kPa, respectively, and those for the left liver were 1.61 ± 0.15 m/s and 7.90 ± 1.47 kPa, respectively. Shear-wave speed (P = 0.005) and stiffness (P = 0.002) were significantly lower in the right liver when compared to the left. The intraclass correlation value for liver stiffness was 0.835 and 0.901 for the right and left liver, respectively, indicating high interobserver agreement. Age, weight, body condition score (BCS), gabapentin administration, and measurement depths were not significantly correlated with liver stiffness or elastography measurements (P > 0.05). Our findings suggest that 2-D SWE measurements of the liver are not influenced significantly by age, weight, or BCS and can be reliably performed without anesthesia and breath-holding in cats. The values determined here can help form the basis for reference elastography values for evaluation of the feline liver.


2011 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Rotemberg ◽  
M Palmeri ◽  
R Nightingale ◽  
N Rouze ◽  
K Nightingale

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 1948-1957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yufeng Deng ◽  
Mark L. Palmeri ◽  
Ned C. Rouze ◽  
Stephen J. Rosenzweig ◽  
Manal F. Abdelmalek ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 657-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Hee Moon ◽  
Ji-Young Hwang ◽  
Jeong Seon Park ◽  
Sung Hye Koh ◽  
Sun-Young Park

Background Shear wave elastography (SWE) using a region of interest (ROI) can demonstrate the quantitative elasticity of breast lesions. Purpose To prospectively evaluate the impact of two different ROI sizes on the diagnostic performance of SWE for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. Material and Methods A total of 154 breast lesions were included. Two types of ROIs were investigated: one involving an approximately 2-mm diameter, small round ROIs placed over the stiffest area of the lesion, as determined by SWE (ROI-S); and another ROI drawn along the margin of the lesion using a touch pen or track ball to encompass the entire lesion (ROI-M). Maximum elasticity (Emax), mean elasticity (Emean), minimum elasticity (Emin), and standard deviation (SD) were measured for the two ROIs. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as well as the sensitivity and specificity of each elasticity value were determined. Results The AUCs for ROI-S were higher than those for ROI-M when differentiating benign and malignant breast solid lesions. The Emax, Emean, Emin, and SD of the elasticity values for ROI-S were 0.865, 0.857, 0.816, and 0.849, respectively, and for ROI-M were 0.820, 0.780, 0.724, and 0.837, respectively. However, only Emax ( P = 0.0024) and Emean ( P = 0.0015) showed statistically significant differences. For ROI-S, the sensitivity and specificity of Emax were 78.8% and 84.3%, respectively, and those for Emean were 80.8% and 81.4%, respectively. Conclusion Using ROI-S with Emax and Emean has better diagnostic performance than ROI-M for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document