scholarly journals Validation of systems biology derived molecular markers of renal donor organ status associated with long term allograft function

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Perco ◽  
Andreas Heinzel ◽  
Johannes Leierer ◽  
Stefan Schneeberger ◽  
Claudia Bösmüller ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. i294-i294
Author(s):  
Paul Perco ◽  
Andreas Heinzel ◽  
Johannes Leierer ◽  
Stefan Schneeberger ◽  
Silvia Wagner ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemie T. Woestenburg ◽  
Gert A. Verpooten ◽  
Dirk K. Ysebaert ◽  
Eric A. Van Marck ◽  
Dierik Verbeelen ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 227-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy E. Riedel ◽  
Vanessa Thulsiraj ◽  
Amity G. Zimmer-Faust ◽  
Rosi Dagit ◽  
Jenna Krug ◽  
...  

Neurosignals ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 300-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideaki Ogasawara ◽  
Tomokazu Doi ◽  
Mitsuo Kawato

KIDNEYS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 130-136
Author(s):  
Yusuf Ercin Sonmez

A transplant between two people who are not genetically identical is called an allotransplant and the process is called allotransplantation. Donor organs and tissues can be from people who are living, or people who have died because of a significant brain injury or lack of circulation. Allotransplantation can create a rejection process where the immune system of the recipient attacks the foreign donor organ or tissue and destroys it. The recipient may need to take immunosuppressive medication for the rest of their life to reduce the risk of rejection of the donated organ. In general, deliberately induced immunosuppression is performed to prevent the body from rejecting an organ transplant. The adverse effects associated with these agents and the risks of long-term immunosuppression present a number of challenges for the clinician. Immune tolerance, or immunological tolerance, or immunotolerance, is a state of unresponsiveness of the immune system to substances or tissue that have the capacity to elicit an immune response in a given organism.


2010 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 502-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper Kers ◽  
Yi-Chun Xu-Dubois ◽  
Eric Rondeau ◽  
Nike Claessen ◽  
Mirza M. Idu ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. S212
Author(s):  
A. Mendoza-Valderrey ◽  
B. Sáez ◽  
M.P. Hernández-Fuentes ◽  
T. Pereira-Veiga ◽  
R. Escobar ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Zhu ◽  
Yanlin Tao ◽  
Tingting Wang ◽  
Jin Zhou ◽  
Yingwen Yang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 160 (5) ◽  
pp. 186-190
Author(s):  
Bernadett Borda ◽  
Attila Nemes ◽  
Csaba Lengyel ◽  
Tamás Várkonyi ◽  
Ferenc Rárosi ◽  
...  

Abstract: Introduction: Increase of liver function is one of the most common complications after kidney transplantation due to the use of immunosuppressive therapy and hyperlipidemia in addition to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Method: Following the selection criteria (n = 59), the study is based on applied immunosuppressive therapy, baseline data of patients, further correlation between HCV and liver function deterioration. Patients were subjected to fasting laboratory examination to monitor serum electrolytes, uric acid and albumin levels. We looked at the effects of immunosuppressive therapy on the lipids (TG, TC, HDL, LDL) and liver enzymes (GOT, GPT, ALP, GGT). The analysis of the relationship between lipids and liver enzymes was also included in our study. Results: The data basics were not significantly different between the tacrolimus and the cyclosporine groups. In the laboratory results, Mg levels were significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.044). The impact of HCV on the liver function was significantly different on GGT (p = 0.008). We examed the lipids and liver function level between the tacrolimus and the patients receiving cyclosporine-based immunosuppression and the total cholesterol (p = 0.005) and GOT (p = 0.05) were significantly different between the two groups. Hyperlipidemia was associated with 26% of patients taking tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, and 89% of those receiving cyclosporine; the difference was significant (p = 0.002). Regarding the effect of hyperlipidemia on liver enzymes, ALP (p = 0.006) and GGT (p = 0.0001) were significantly higher. Conclusion: Increases in hepatic enzymes, ALT and GGT indicate the damage to hepatocytes. Beside the increase of liver function, which is the main risk factor in hepatitis on HCV soil, the applied immunosuppressive therapy and hyperlipidemia lead to degradation of allograft function and long-term graft loss. Orv hetil. 2019; 160(5): 186–190.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document