scholarly journals Crystallographic snapshots of ligand binding to hexameric purine nucleoside phosphorylase and kinetic studies give insight into the mechanism of catalysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoran Štefanić ◽  
Marta Narczyk ◽  
Goran Mikleušević ◽  
Saša Kazazić ◽  
Agnieszka Bzowska ◽  
...  
1991 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 223-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mamdouh Y. Kamel ◽  
Afaf S. Fahmy ◽  
Abdel H. Ghazy ◽  
Magda A. Mohamed

Purine nucleoside phosphorylase from Hyalomma dromedarii, the camel tick, was purified to apparent homogeneity. A molecular weight of 56 000 – 58 000 was estimated for both the native and denatured enzyme, suggesting that the enzyme is monomeric. Unlike purine nucleoside phosphorylase preparations from other tissues, the H. dromedarii enzyme was unstable in the presence of β-mercaptoethanol. The enzyme had a sharp pH optimum at pH 6.5. It catalyzed the phosphorolysis and arsenolysis of ribo- and deoxyribo-nucleosides of hypoxanthine and guanine, but not of adenine or pyrimidine nucleosides. The Km values of the enzyme at the optimal pH for inosine, deoxyinosine, guanosine, and deoxyguanosine were 0.31, 0.67, 0.55, and 0.33 mM, respectively. Inactivation and kinetic studies suggested that histidine and cysteine residues were essential for activity. The pKa values determined for catalytic ionizable groups were 6–7 and 8–9. The enzyme was completely inactivated by thiol reagents and reactivated by excess β-mercaptoethanol. The enzyme was also susceptible to pH-dependent photooxidation in the presence of methylene blue, implicating histidine. Initial velocity studies showed an intersecting pattern of double-reciprocal plots of the data, consistent with a sequential mechanism.Key words: Acarina, Hyalomma dromedarii, purine nucleoside phosphorylase, kinetics, active site, catalytic mechanism.


2006 ◽  
Vol 110 (2) ◽  
pp. 463-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Núñez ◽  
Corin Wing ◽  
Dimitri Antoniou ◽  
Vern L. Schramm ◽  
Steven D. Schwartz

Biochimie ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 93 (9) ◽  
pp. 1610-1622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goran Mikleušević ◽  
Zoran Štefanić ◽  
Marta Narczyk ◽  
Beata Wielgus-Kutrowska ◽  
Agnieszka Bzowska ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Narczyk ◽  
Łukasz Mioduszewski ◽  
Aleksandra Oksiejuk ◽  
Maria Winiewska-Szajewska ◽  
Beata Wielgus-Kutrowska ◽  
...  

AbstractE. coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase is a homohexamer, which structure, in the apo form, can be described as a trimer of dimers. Earlier studies suggested that ligand binding and kinetic properties are well described by two binding constants and two sets of kinetic constants. However, most of the crystal structures of this enzyme complexes with ligands do not hold the three-fold symmetry, but only two-fold symmetry, as one of the three dimers is different (both active sites in the open conformation) from the other two (one active site in the open and one in the closed conformation). Our recent detailed studies conducted over broad ligand concentration range suggest that protein–ligand complex formation in solution actually deviates from the two-binding-site model. To reveal the details of interactions present in the hexameric molecule we have engineered a single tryptophan Y160W mutant, responding with substantial intrinsic fluorescence change upon ligand binding. By observing various physical properties of the protein and its various complexes with substrate and substrate analogues we have shown that indeed three-binding-site model is necessary to properly describe binding of ligands by both the wild type enzyme and the Y160W mutant. Thus we have pointed out that a symmetrical dimer with both active sites in the open conformation is not forced to adopt this conformation by interactions in the crystal, but most probably the dimers forming the hexamer in solution are not equivalent as well. This, in turn, implies that an allosteric cooperation occurs not only within a dimer, but also among all three dimers forming a hexameric molecule.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document